Loading…
Evaluation of cull sweet potato storage roots as a winter supplement to grazing for cow-calf pairs
Cull sweet potato storage roots that would otherwise be leftunharvested in production fields or dumped as waste from excess supplies in storage may be available for use as livestock feed at competitive pricing relative to other feedstuffs. Given this potential economical source of nutrients for cons...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of animal science 2019-07, Vol.97, p.57-57 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 57 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 57 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Parish, Jane A Rutherford, Cobie Meyers, Stephen L Shankle, Mark W |
description | Cull sweet potato storage roots that would otherwise be leftunharvested in production fields or dumped as waste from excess supplies in storage may be available for use as livestock feed at competitive pricing relative to other feedstuffs. Given this potential economical source of nutrients for consumption by beef cattle, the objective of this study was to assess cow-calf performance using unprocessed sweetpotato storage roots as a winter supplement to grazing cow-calf pairs as compared to whole cottonseed or no supplement. Fall-calving multiparous Bos taurus crossbred cows in Prairie, MS, were allotted ad libitum access to mixed-grass pasture with tall fescue as the predominant forage species and randomly allocated to one of three as-fed basis supplement groups: 6.8 kg/cow/d of sweetpotato storage roots (SWP); 2.3 kg/ cow/d of whole cottonseed (WCS); or no supplement (NONE). Supplements were offered to cows on a group basis on every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for 93 d each winter initiating December 5, 2016 (n = 81) and December 11, 2017 (n = 105). Cow BCS on a scale of 1 to 9 (1 = emaciated; 9 = obese) at supplementation initiation was 6.1 ± 0.1. From supplementation initiation until calf weaning in March, change in cow BCS (P < 0.01) was greatest for NONE (-1.1 ± 0.1), intermediate for SWP (-0.7 ± 0.1), and least for WCS (-0.4 ± 0.1). Adjusted 205-d calf BW was 16.9 ± 3.8 kg heavier (P < 0.01) in steers than heifers but did not differ (P = 0.41) among supplementation groups. Although nursing calf performance was not impacted by supplementation regime, results suggest that cull sweetpotato storage roots may be an effective feedstufffor winter supplementation intended to reduce BCS loss in lactating beef cows. Additional research to determine optimal frequency and quantity of SWP supplementation is warranted |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2283107130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2283107130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_22831071303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNisuKwkAQAAdR2OjuPzR4DsyDrNnzovgB3qUNk5AwTs9O92zArzcHP0AoqEPVSlWmsU3tzLdbq0pra-q2NfZDbZknrY1tfppK3Y7_GArKSBGoh66EADx7L5BIUAhYKOPgIRMJAy7APEbxGbikFPzdR4HlGzI-xjhATxk6musOQw8Jx8yfatNjYP_18k7tT8fL77lOmf6KZ7lOVHJc0tXa1hl9ME67964n09dHHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283107130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of cull sweet potato storage roots as a winter supplement to grazing for cow-calf pairs</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Parish, Jane A ; Rutherford, Cobie ; Meyers, Stephen L ; Shankle, Mark W</creator><creatorcontrib>Parish, Jane A ; Rutherford, Cobie ; Meyers, Stephen L ; Shankle, Mark W</creatorcontrib><description>Cull sweet potato storage roots that would otherwise be leftunharvested in production fields or dumped as waste from excess supplies in storage may be available for use as livestock feed at competitive pricing relative to other feedstuffs. Given this potential economical source of nutrients for consumption by beef cattle, the objective of this study was to assess cow-calf performance using unprocessed sweetpotato storage roots as a winter supplement to grazing cow-calf pairs as compared to whole cottonseed or no supplement. Fall-calving multiparous Bos taurus crossbred cows in Prairie, MS, were allotted ad libitum access to mixed-grass pasture with tall fescue as the predominant forage species and randomly allocated to one of three as-fed basis supplement groups: 6.8 kg/cow/d of sweetpotato storage roots (SWP); 2.3 kg/ cow/d of whole cottonseed (WCS); or no supplement (NONE). Supplements were offered to cows on a group basis on every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for 93 d each winter initiating December 5, 2016 (n = 81) and December 11, 2017 (n = 105). Cow BCS on a scale of 1 to 9 (1 = emaciated; 9 = obese) at supplementation initiation was 6.1 ± 0.1. From supplementation initiation until calf weaning in March, change in cow BCS (P < 0.01) was greatest for NONE (-1.1 ± 0.1), intermediate for SWP (-0.7 ± 0.1), and least for WCS (-0.4 ± 0.1). Adjusted 205-d calf BW was 16.9 ± 3.8 kg heavier (P < 0.01) in steers than heifers but did not differ (P = 0.41) among supplementation groups. Although nursing calf performance was not impacted by supplementation regime, results suggest that cull sweetpotato storage roots may be an effective feedstufffor winter supplementation intended to reduce BCS loss in lactating beef cows. Additional research to determine optimal frequency and quantity of SWP supplementation is warranted</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Beef ; Beef cattle ; Feeds ; Grazing ; Livestock ; Livestock feed ; Livestock feeds ; Nursing ; Nutrients ; Pasture ; Potatoes ; Roots ; Supplements ; Sweet potatoes ; Weaning ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2019-07, Vol.97, p.57-57</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parish, Jane A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Cobie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankle, Mark W</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of cull sweet potato storage roots as a winter supplement to grazing for cow-calf pairs</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Cull sweet potato storage roots that would otherwise be leftunharvested in production fields or dumped as waste from excess supplies in storage may be available for use as livestock feed at competitive pricing relative to other feedstuffs. Given this potential economical source of nutrients for consumption by beef cattle, the objective of this study was to assess cow-calf performance using unprocessed sweetpotato storage roots as a winter supplement to grazing cow-calf pairs as compared to whole cottonseed or no supplement. Fall-calving multiparous Bos taurus crossbred cows in Prairie, MS, were allotted ad libitum access to mixed-grass pasture with tall fescue as the predominant forage species and randomly allocated to one of three as-fed basis supplement groups: 6.8 kg/cow/d of sweetpotato storage roots (SWP); 2.3 kg/ cow/d of whole cottonseed (WCS); or no supplement (NONE). Supplements were offered to cows on a group basis on every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for 93 d each winter initiating December 5, 2016 (n = 81) and December 11, 2017 (n = 105). Cow BCS on a scale of 1 to 9 (1 = emaciated; 9 = obese) at supplementation initiation was 6.1 ± 0.1. From supplementation initiation until calf weaning in March, change in cow BCS (P < 0.01) was greatest for NONE (-1.1 ± 0.1), intermediate for SWP (-0.7 ± 0.1), and least for WCS (-0.4 ± 0.1). Adjusted 205-d calf BW was 16.9 ± 3.8 kg heavier (P < 0.01) in steers than heifers but did not differ (P = 0.41) among supplementation groups. Although nursing calf performance was not impacted by supplementation regime, results suggest that cull sweetpotato storage roots may be an effective feedstufffor winter supplementation intended to reduce BCS loss in lactating beef cows. Additional research to determine optimal frequency and quantity of SWP supplementation is warranted</description><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock feed</subject><subject>Livestock feeds</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Potatoes</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Supplements</subject><subject>Sweet potatoes</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNisuKwkAQAAdR2OjuPzR4DsyDrNnzovgB3qUNk5AwTs9O92zArzcHP0AoqEPVSlWmsU3tzLdbq0pra-q2NfZDbZknrY1tfppK3Y7_GArKSBGoh66EADx7L5BIUAhYKOPgIRMJAy7APEbxGbikFPzdR4HlGzI-xjhATxk6musOQw8Jx8yfatNjYP_18k7tT8fL77lOmf6KZ7lOVHJc0tXa1hl9ME67964n09dHHQ</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Parish, Jane A</creator><creator>Rutherford, Cobie</creator><creator>Meyers, Stephen L</creator><creator>Shankle, Mark W</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of cull sweet potato storage roots as a winter supplement to grazing for cow-calf pairs</title><author>Parish, Jane A ; Rutherford, Cobie ; Meyers, Stephen L ; Shankle, Mark W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22831071303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock feed</topic><topic>Livestock feeds</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Potatoes</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Supplements</topic><topic>Sweet potatoes</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parish, Jane A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Cobie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankle, Mark W</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parish, Jane A</au><au>Rutherford, Cobie</au><au>Meyers, Stephen L</au><au>Shankle, Mark W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of cull sweet potato storage roots as a winter supplement to grazing for cow-calf pairs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>97</volume><spage>57</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>57-57</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Cull sweet potato storage roots that would otherwise be leftunharvested in production fields or dumped as waste from excess supplies in storage may be available for use as livestock feed at competitive pricing relative to other feedstuffs. Given this potential economical source of nutrients for consumption by beef cattle, the objective of this study was to assess cow-calf performance using unprocessed sweetpotato storage roots as a winter supplement to grazing cow-calf pairs as compared to whole cottonseed or no supplement. Fall-calving multiparous Bos taurus crossbred cows in Prairie, MS, were allotted ad libitum access to mixed-grass pasture with tall fescue as the predominant forage species and randomly allocated to one of three as-fed basis supplement groups: 6.8 kg/cow/d of sweetpotato storage roots (SWP); 2.3 kg/ cow/d of whole cottonseed (WCS); or no supplement (NONE). Supplements were offered to cows on a group basis on every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for 93 d each winter initiating December 5, 2016 (n = 81) and December 11, 2017 (n = 105). Cow BCS on a scale of 1 to 9 (1 = emaciated; 9 = obese) at supplementation initiation was 6.1 ± 0.1. From supplementation initiation until calf weaning in March, change in cow BCS (P < 0.01) was greatest for NONE (-1.1 ± 0.1), intermediate for SWP (-0.7 ± 0.1), and least for WCS (-0.4 ± 0.1). Adjusted 205-d calf BW was 16.9 ± 3.8 kg heavier (P < 0.01) in steers than heifers but did not differ (P = 0.41) among supplementation groups. Although nursing calf performance was not impacted by supplementation regime, results suggest that cull sweetpotato storage roots may be an effective feedstufffor winter supplementation intended to reduce BCS loss in lactating beef cows. Additional research to determine optimal frequency and quantity of SWP supplementation is warranted</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2019-07, Vol.97, p.57-57 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2283107130 |
source | PubMed Central(OpenAccess); Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Beef Beef cattle Feeds Grazing Livestock Livestock feed Livestock feeds Nursing Nutrients Pasture Potatoes Roots Supplements Sweet potatoes Weaning Winter |
title | Evaluation of cull sweet potato storage roots as a winter supplement to grazing for cow-calf pairs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A55%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20cull%20sweet%20potato%20storage%20roots%20as%20a%20winter%20supplement%20to%20grazing%20for%20cow-calf%20pairs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Parish,%20Jane%20A&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=97&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=57-57&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2283107130%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22831071303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283107130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |