The role of mutual funds in the sustainable energy sector

The integration of renewable energy criteria in mutual fund investment decisions could channel private resources into the funding of environmentally related projects implemented by firms contributing to sustainable development. This paper examines the performance of European renewable energy funds t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Business strategy and the environment 2019-09, Vol.28 (6), p.1107-1120
Main Author: Marti‐Ballester, Carmen‐Pilar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alternative energy
Benchmarks
black energy funds
Clean energy
conventional funds
Energy efficiency
Energy industry
Energy technology
Fossil fuels
Funds
Investment
Investments
Markets
Mutual funds
performance evaluation
Renewable energy
renewable energy funds
renewable energy screening
Renewable energy technologies
Renewable resources
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Sustainable energy
Technology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-9f4be77bde5a95822207fb7a6fceae325cd059b14dbf054ec57540fabf6bb6f23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-9f4be77bde5a95822207fb7a6fceae325cd059b14dbf054ec57540fabf6bb6f23
container_end_page 1120
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1107
container_title Business strategy and the environment
container_volume 28
creator Marti‐Ballester, Carmen‐Pilar
description The integration of renewable energy criteria in mutual fund investment decisions could channel private resources into the funding of environmentally related projects implemented by firms contributing to sustainable development. This paper examines the performance of European renewable energy funds that invest globally by comparing their risk‐adjusted returns with those achieved by black energy and conventional mutual funds. It uses Carhart's model on a sample of 81 renewable energy funds, 125 black energy funds, and 4,337 conventional mutual funds. The results indicate that 32.1% of renewable mutual funds—most of which adopt energy producers, renewable energy technology, and energy efficiency‐focused criteria—perform significantly better than the S&P Clean Energy market benchmark, this percentage being affected by the different states of the economy. However, none of them are able to beat the fossil fuel energy (S&P Global 1200 Energy Index) or conventional market benchmarks (S&P Global 1200 Index). Furthermore, 37.04% of renewable energy funds significantly underperform the S&P Global 1200 benchmark. Therefore, the investment in renewable energy funds has a financial cost for investors in relation to conventional fund investors.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bse.2305
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2283240103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2283240103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-9f4be77bde5a95822207fb7a6fceae325cd059b14dbf054ec57540fabf6bb6f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LxDAQBuAgCtZV8CcEvHjpOs1H2xx1WT9gwYPrOSTtRLt02zVpkf57s9arp4GZh3fgJeQ6g2UGwO5swCXjIE9IkoFSKZQ8PyUJqFykouD8nFyEsAOIC1YmRG0_kfq-Rdo7uh-H0bTUjV0daNPRId7CGAbTdMZGgh36j4kGrIbeX5IzZ9qAV39zQd4f19vVc7p5fXpZ3W_SirNcpsoJi0Vha5RGyZIxBoWzhcldhQY5k1UNUtlM1NaBFFjJQgpwxrrc2twxviA3c-7B918jhkHv-tF38aVmrORMQAY8qttZVb4PwaPTB9_sjZ90BvpYjI7F6GMxkaYz_W5anP51-uFt_et_AAtKY6k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283240103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of mutual funds in the sustainable energy sector</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Marti‐Ballester, Carmen‐Pilar</creator><creatorcontrib>Marti‐Ballester, Carmen‐Pilar</creatorcontrib><description>The integration of renewable energy criteria in mutual fund investment decisions could channel private resources into the funding of environmentally related projects implemented by firms contributing to sustainable development. This paper examines the performance of European renewable energy funds that invest globally by comparing their risk‐adjusted returns with those achieved by black energy and conventional mutual funds. It uses Carhart's model on a sample of 81 renewable energy funds, 125 black energy funds, and 4,337 conventional mutual funds. The results indicate that 32.1% of renewable mutual funds—most of which adopt energy producers, renewable energy technology, and energy efficiency‐focused criteria—perform significantly better than the S&amp;P Clean Energy market benchmark, this percentage being affected by the different states of the economy. However, none of them are able to beat the fossil fuel energy (S&amp;P Global 1200 Energy Index) or conventional market benchmarks (S&amp;P Global 1200 Index). Furthermore, 37.04% of renewable energy funds significantly underperform the S&amp;P Global 1200 benchmark. Therefore, the investment in renewable energy funds has a financial cost for investors in relation to conventional fund investors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4733</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bse.2305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Alternative energy ; Benchmarks ; black energy funds ; Clean energy ; conventional funds ; Energy efficiency ; Energy industry ; Energy technology ; Fossil fuels ; Funds ; Investment ; Investments ; Markets ; Mutual funds ; performance evaluation ; Renewable energy ; renewable energy funds ; renewable energy screening ; Renewable energy technologies ; Renewable resources ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable energy ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Business strategy and the environment, 2019-09, Vol.28 (6), p.1107-1120</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-9f4be77bde5a95822207fb7a6fceae325cd059b14dbf054ec57540fabf6bb6f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-9f4be77bde5a95822207fb7a6fceae325cd059b14dbf054ec57540fabf6bb6f23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4085-7677</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marti‐Ballester, Carmen‐Pilar</creatorcontrib><title>The role of mutual funds in the sustainable energy sector</title><title>Business strategy and the environment</title><description>The integration of renewable energy criteria in mutual fund investment decisions could channel private resources into the funding of environmentally related projects implemented by firms contributing to sustainable development. This paper examines the performance of European renewable energy funds that invest globally by comparing their risk‐adjusted returns with those achieved by black energy and conventional mutual funds. It uses Carhart's model on a sample of 81 renewable energy funds, 125 black energy funds, and 4,337 conventional mutual funds. The results indicate that 32.1% of renewable mutual funds—most of which adopt energy producers, renewable energy technology, and energy efficiency‐focused criteria—perform significantly better than the S&amp;P Clean Energy market benchmark, this percentage being affected by the different states of the economy. However, none of them are able to beat the fossil fuel energy (S&amp;P Global 1200 Energy Index) or conventional market benchmarks (S&amp;P Global 1200 Index). Furthermore, 37.04% of renewable energy funds significantly underperform the S&amp;P Global 1200 benchmark. Therefore, the investment in renewable energy funds has a financial cost for investors in relation to conventional fund investors.</description><subject>Alternative energy</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>black energy funds</subject><subject>Clean energy</subject><subject>conventional funds</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy technology</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Funds</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mutual funds</subject><subject>performance evaluation</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>renewable energy funds</subject><subject>renewable energy screening</subject><subject>Renewable energy technologies</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable energy</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0964-4733</issn><issn>1099-0836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LxDAQBuAgCtZV8CcEvHjpOs1H2xx1WT9gwYPrOSTtRLt02zVpkf57s9arp4GZh3fgJeQ6g2UGwO5swCXjIE9IkoFSKZQ8PyUJqFykouD8nFyEsAOIC1YmRG0_kfq-Rdo7uh-H0bTUjV0daNPRId7CGAbTdMZGgh36j4kGrIbeX5IzZ9qAV39zQd4f19vVc7p5fXpZ3W_SirNcpsoJi0Vha5RGyZIxBoWzhcldhQY5k1UNUtlM1NaBFFjJQgpwxrrc2twxviA3c-7B918jhkHv-tF38aVmrORMQAY8qttZVb4PwaPTB9_sjZ90BvpYjI7F6GMxkaYz_W5anP51-uFt_et_AAtKY6k</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Marti‐Ballester, Carmen‐Pilar</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4085-7677</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>The role of mutual funds in the sustainable energy sector</title><author>Marti‐Ballester, Carmen‐Pilar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-9f4be77bde5a95822207fb7a6fceae325cd059b14dbf054ec57540fabf6bb6f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>black energy funds</topic><topic>Clean energy</topic><topic>conventional funds</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy technology</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Funds</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mutual funds</topic><topic>performance evaluation</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>renewable energy funds</topic><topic>renewable energy screening</topic><topic>Renewable energy technologies</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable energy</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marti‐Ballester, Carmen‐Pilar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Business strategy and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marti‐Ballester, Carmen‐Pilar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of mutual funds in the sustainable energy sector</atitle><jtitle>Business strategy and the environment</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1107</spage><epage>1120</epage><pages>1107-1120</pages><issn>0964-4733</issn><eissn>1099-0836</eissn><abstract>The integration of renewable energy criteria in mutual fund investment decisions could channel private resources into the funding of environmentally related projects implemented by firms contributing to sustainable development. This paper examines the performance of European renewable energy funds that invest globally by comparing their risk‐adjusted returns with those achieved by black energy and conventional mutual funds. It uses Carhart's model on a sample of 81 renewable energy funds, 125 black energy funds, and 4,337 conventional mutual funds. The results indicate that 32.1% of renewable mutual funds—most of which adopt energy producers, renewable energy technology, and energy efficiency‐focused criteria—perform significantly better than the S&amp;P Clean Energy market benchmark, this percentage being affected by the different states of the economy. However, none of them are able to beat the fossil fuel energy (S&amp;P Global 1200 Energy Index) or conventional market benchmarks (S&amp;P Global 1200 Index). Furthermore, 37.04% of renewable energy funds significantly underperform the S&amp;P Global 1200 benchmark. Therefore, the investment in renewable energy funds has a financial cost for investors in relation to conventional fund investors.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/bse.2305</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4085-7677</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-4733
ispartof Business strategy and the environment, 2019-09, Vol.28 (6), p.1107-1120
issn 0964-4733
1099-0836
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2283240103
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Alternative energy
Benchmarks
black energy funds
Clean energy
conventional funds
Energy efficiency
Energy industry
Energy technology
Fossil fuels
Funds
Investment
Investments
Markets
Mutual funds
performance evaluation
Renewable energy
renewable energy funds
renewable energy screening
Renewable energy technologies
Renewable resources
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Sustainable energy
Technology
title The role of mutual funds in the sustainable energy sector
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A59%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20mutual%20funds%20in%20the%20sustainable%20energy%20sector&rft.jtitle=Business%20strategy%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=Marti%E2%80%90Ballester,%20Carmen%E2%80%90Pilar&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1107&rft.epage=1120&rft.pages=1107-1120&rft.issn=0964-4733&rft.eissn=1099-0836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bse.2305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2283240103%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-9f4be77bde5a95822207fb7a6fceae325cd059b14dbf054ec57540fabf6bb6f23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283240103&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true