Loading…

A Multicenter Randomized Masked Comparison Trial of Synthetic Surfactant Versus Calf Lung Surfactant Extract in the Prevention of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome

To compare the efficacy and safety of a synthetic surfactant (Exosurf Neonatal, Burroughs Wellcome Co) and a surfactant extract of calf lung lavage (Infasurf, IND #27,169, ONY, Inc) in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Ten-center randomized masked comparison trial. Prem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 1997-07, Vol.100 (1), p.39-50
Main Authors: Hudak, Mark L, Martin, David J, Egan, Edmund A, Matteson, Elizabeth J, Cummings, J, Jung, August L, Kimberlin, Lois V, Auten, Richard L, Rosenberg, Adam A, Asselin, Jeanette M, Belcastro, Marc R, Donohue, Pamela K, Hamm Jr, Charles R, Jansen, Robert D, Brody, Alan S, Riddlesberger, Merchline M, Montgomery, Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-d4a7de17167a1cb14c8721c22a949538e5ab8c72fb34b615ea9db09a25bdb8863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-d4a7de17167a1cb14c8721c22a949538e5ab8c72fb34b615ea9db09a25bdb8863
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 39
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 100
creator Hudak, Mark L
Martin, David J
Egan, Edmund A
Matteson, Elizabeth J
Cummings, J
Jung, August L
Kimberlin, Lois V
Auten, Richard L
Rosenberg, Adam A
Asselin, Jeanette M
Belcastro, Marc R
Donohue, Pamela K
Hamm Jr, Charles R
Jansen, Robert D
Brody, Alan S
Riddlesberger, Merchline M
Montgomery, Paul
description To compare the efficacy and safety of a synthetic surfactant (Exosurf Neonatal, Burroughs Wellcome Co) and a surfactant extract of calf lung lavage (Infasurf, IND #27,169, ONY, Inc) in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Ten-center randomized masked comparison trial. Premature infants (n = 871)
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.100.1.39
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_228352296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A19580499</galeid><sourcerecordid>A19580499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-d4a7de17167a1cb14c8721c22a949538e5ab8c72fb34b615ea9db09a25bdb8863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptklFv0zAQxyMEGmXwyCOShXjgYSm2EzfxY1XGQOoY2gav0cW5pB6p3dkOrHwiPiaOVpVNqvxwPt_v7m-fL0leMzplIucfNtj4KaPRm2bySTJhVJZpzgvxNJlQmrE0p1Q8T154f0MpzUXBj5IjyWNIlJPk75ycD33QCk1ARy7BNHat_2BDzsH_jGZh1xtw2ltDrp2GntiWXG1NWGFMIleDa0EFMIH8QOcHTxbQt2Q5mO5h7PQuuLgl2pCYSL45_BX1dKwZq31FayDEypfoN9pBsG5LPmofHHo_ajXOrvFl8qyF3uOrnT1Ovn86vV58TpcXZ18W82WqBC9C2uRQNMgKNiuAqZrlqiw4U5yDzKXIShRQl6rgbZ3l9YwJBNnUVAIXdVOX5Sw7Tt7e1904ezugD9WNHZyJkhXnZSY4lyN0cg910GOlTWvH93Vo0EFvDbY6Hs-ZFCXNpYx4egCPq8G1Vof494_4iAS8Cx0M3lfl2fIRenIIVbbvscMqtmZxcegmylnvHbbVxuk1uG3FaDWOUzWOU3SiV2Uj_2bXjaFeY7Ond_MT4-92cfAq_rwDo7TfY7zImaSz_7Ir3a1-a4ejjIbgtPIPtnvZf15J5EU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228352296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Multicenter Randomized Masked Comparison Trial of Synthetic Surfactant Versus Calf Lung Surfactant Extract in the Prevention of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hudak, Mark L ; Martin, David J ; Egan, Edmund A ; Matteson, Elizabeth J ; Cummings, J ; Jung, August L ; Kimberlin, Lois V ; Auten, Richard L ; Rosenberg, Adam A ; Asselin, Jeanette M ; Belcastro, Marc R ; Donohue, Pamela K ; Hamm Jr, Charles R ; Jansen, Robert D ; Brody, Alan S ; Riddlesberger, Merchline M ; Montgomery, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Hudak, Mark L ; Martin, David J ; Egan, Edmund A ; Matteson, Elizabeth J ; Cummings, J ; Jung, August L ; Kimberlin, Lois V ; Auten, Richard L ; Rosenberg, Adam A ; Asselin, Jeanette M ; Belcastro, Marc R ; Donohue, Pamela K ; Hamm Jr, Charles R ; Jansen, Robert D ; Brody, Alan S ; Riddlesberger, Merchline M ; Montgomery, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the efficacy and safety of a synthetic surfactant (Exosurf Neonatal, Burroughs Wellcome Co) and a surfactant extract of calf lung lavage (Infasurf, IND #27,169, ONY, Inc) in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Ten-center randomized masked comparison trial. Premature infants (n = 871) &lt;29 weeks gestational age by best obstetric estimate. Infants were randomly assigned to a course of treatment with Exosurf Neonatal (n = 438) or Infasurf (n = 433) at birth, and if still intubated, at 12 and 24 hours of age. Crossover treatment was allowed within 72 hours of age if severe respiratory failure (defined as two consecutive a/A PO2 ratios &lt;/=.10) persisted after three doses of the randomized surfactant. Three primary outcome measures of efficacy [the incidence of RDS; the incidence of RDS death; and the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days after birth] were compared using linear regression techniques. Of 871 randomized infants, 18 infants did not receive treatment with a study surfactant, and 25 infants did not meet all eligibility criteria. The primary analysis of efficacy was performed in the 846 eligible infants and analysis of safety outcomes in the 853 infants who received study surfactant. Demographic characteristics did not differ between the two treatment groups. Compared with Exosurf, Infasurf treatment resulted in a 62% decrease in the incidence of RDS (Infasurf, 16% vs Exosurf, 42%) and a 70% decrease in RDS death (Infasurf, 1.7% vs Exosurf, 5.4%) but did not increase the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days. Treatment with Infasurf resulted in significant improvement in several secondary outcome measures. Infasurf-treated infants had lower average FIO2 (Infasurf, .33 [SEM] vs Exosurf, .42; difference .08; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06 to .11) and average mean airway pressure (Infasurf, 6.0 cm H2O vs Exosurf, 7.1 cm H2O; difference 1.1 cm H2O; 95% CI, .7 to 1.6 cm H2O) for the first 72 hours of life. Crossover surfactant treatment was significantly less frequent in the Infasurf compared with the Exosurf group (Infasurf, 1% vs Exosurf, 6%). Complications (bradycardia, clinical airway obstruction, and transcutaneous arterial desaturation) associated with second and third, but not initial, surfactant treatments were observed more frequently in the Infasurf treatment group. Infasurf-treated infants had significantly less air leak (&lt;/=7 days) (Infasurf, 8% vs Exosurf, 14%; adjusted relative risk [ARR] .55; 95% CI, .37 to .81). Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (grade 3 and 4) did not differ between the two groups (Infasurf, 11.8% vs Exosurf, 8.3%; ARR 1.41; 95% CI, .94 to 2.09) but total IVH occurred more frequently in Infasurf-treated infants (Infasurf, 39.0% vs Exosurf, 29.9%; ARR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.57). Significant reductions in the incidence of RDS, the severity of early respiratory disease, the incidence of pulmonary air leaks associated with RDS, and the mortality attributable to RDS suggest that Infasurf is a more effective surfactant preparation than Exosurf Neonatal in the prophylaxis of RDS. However, Infasurf prophylaxis as used in this study was also associated with a greater risk of total but not severe IVH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.100.1.39</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9200358</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEDIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elk Grove Village, IL: Am Acad Pediatrics</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Age Factors ; Babies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - prevention & control ; Care and treatment ; Cerebral Hemorrhage - prevention & control ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Drug Combinations ; Evaluation ; Fatty Alcohols - administration & dosage ; Fatty Alcohols - adverse effects ; Fatty Alcohols - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Linear Models ; Lung surfactant, Synthetic ; Lungs ; Male ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Pediatrics ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Phosphorylcholine ; Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage ; Polyethylene Glycols - adverse effects ; Polyethylene Glycols - therapeutic use ; Pulmonary Surfactants - administration & dosage ; Pulmonary Surfactants - adverse effects ; Pulmonary Surfactants - therapeutic use ; Respiratory diseases ; Respiratory distress syndrome ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - mortality ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - prevention & control ; Respiratory system ; Synthetic lung surfactants ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 1997-07, Vol.100 (1), p.39-50</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1997 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics Jul 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-d4a7de17167a1cb14c8721c22a949538e5ab8c72fb34b615ea9db09a25bdb8863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-d4a7de17167a1cb14c8721c22a949538e5ab8c72fb34b615ea9db09a25bdb8863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2741906$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9200358$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hudak, Mark L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egan, Edmund A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matteson, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, August L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimberlin, Lois V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auten, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Adam A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asselin, Jeanette M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belcastro, Marc R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohue, Pamela K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamm Jr, Charles R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brody, Alan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riddlesberger, Merchline M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>A Multicenter Randomized Masked Comparison Trial of Synthetic Surfactant Versus Calf Lung Surfactant Extract in the Prevention of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>To compare the efficacy and safety of a synthetic surfactant (Exosurf Neonatal, Burroughs Wellcome Co) and a surfactant extract of calf lung lavage (Infasurf, IND #27,169, ONY, Inc) in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Ten-center randomized masked comparison trial. Premature infants (n = 871) &lt;29 weeks gestational age by best obstetric estimate. Infants were randomly assigned to a course of treatment with Exosurf Neonatal (n = 438) or Infasurf (n = 433) at birth, and if still intubated, at 12 and 24 hours of age. Crossover treatment was allowed within 72 hours of age if severe respiratory failure (defined as two consecutive a/A PO2 ratios &lt;/=.10) persisted after three doses of the randomized surfactant. Three primary outcome measures of efficacy [the incidence of RDS; the incidence of RDS death; and the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days after birth] were compared using linear regression techniques. Of 871 randomized infants, 18 infants did not receive treatment with a study surfactant, and 25 infants did not meet all eligibility criteria. The primary analysis of efficacy was performed in the 846 eligible infants and analysis of safety outcomes in the 853 infants who received study surfactant. Demographic characteristics did not differ between the two treatment groups. Compared with Exosurf, Infasurf treatment resulted in a 62% decrease in the incidence of RDS (Infasurf, 16% vs Exosurf, 42%) and a 70% decrease in RDS death (Infasurf, 1.7% vs Exosurf, 5.4%) but did not increase the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days. Treatment with Infasurf resulted in significant improvement in several secondary outcome measures. Infasurf-treated infants had lower average FIO2 (Infasurf, .33 [SEM] vs Exosurf, .42; difference .08; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06 to .11) and average mean airway pressure (Infasurf, 6.0 cm H2O vs Exosurf, 7.1 cm H2O; difference 1.1 cm H2O; 95% CI, .7 to 1.6 cm H2O) for the first 72 hours of life. Crossover surfactant treatment was significantly less frequent in the Infasurf compared with the Exosurf group (Infasurf, 1% vs Exosurf, 6%). Complications (bradycardia, clinical airway obstruction, and transcutaneous arterial desaturation) associated with second and third, but not initial, surfactant treatments were observed more frequently in the Infasurf treatment group. Infasurf-treated infants had significantly less air leak (&lt;/=7 days) (Infasurf, 8% vs Exosurf, 14%; adjusted relative risk [ARR] .55; 95% CI, .37 to .81). Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (grade 3 and 4) did not differ between the two groups (Infasurf, 11.8% vs Exosurf, 8.3%; ARR 1.41; 95% CI, .94 to 2.09) but total IVH occurred more frequently in Infasurf-treated infants (Infasurf, 39.0% vs Exosurf, 29.9%; ARR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.57). Significant reductions in the incidence of RDS, the severity of early respiratory disease, the incidence of pulmonary air leaks associated with RDS, and the mortality attributable to RDS suggest that Infasurf is a more effective surfactant preparation than Exosurf Neonatal in the prophylaxis of RDS. However, Infasurf prophylaxis as used in this study was also associated with a greater risk of total but not severe IVH.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cerebral Hemorrhage - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fatty Alcohols - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Fatty Alcohols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fatty Alcohols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Lung surfactant, Synthetic</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Phosphorylcholine</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pulmonary Surfactants - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Pulmonary Surfactants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pulmonary Surfactants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>Respiratory distress syndrome</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - mortality</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Respiratory system</subject><subject>Synthetic lung surfactants</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptklFv0zAQxyMEGmXwyCOShXjgYSm2EzfxY1XGQOoY2gav0cW5pB6p3dkOrHwiPiaOVpVNqvxwPt_v7m-fL0leMzplIucfNtj4KaPRm2bySTJhVJZpzgvxNJlQmrE0p1Q8T154f0MpzUXBj5IjyWNIlJPk75ycD33QCk1ARy7BNHat_2BDzsH_jGZh1xtw2ltDrp2GntiWXG1NWGFMIleDa0EFMIH8QOcHTxbQt2Q5mO5h7PQuuLgl2pCYSL45_BX1dKwZq31FayDEypfoN9pBsG5LPmofHHo_ajXOrvFl8qyF3uOrnT1Ovn86vV58TpcXZ18W82WqBC9C2uRQNMgKNiuAqZrlqiw4U5yDzKXIShRQl6rgbZ3l9YwJBNnUVAIXdVOX5Sw7Tt7e1904ezugD9WNHZyJkhXnZSY4lyN0cg910GOlTWvH93Vo0EFvDbY6Hs-ZFCXNpYx4egCPq8G1Vof494_4iAS8Cx0M3lfl2fIRenIIVbbvscMqtmZxcegmylnvHbbVxuk1uG3FaDWOUzWOU3SiV2Uj_2bXjaFeY7Ond_MT4-92cfAq_rwDo7TfY7zImaSz_7Ir3a1-a4ejjIbgtPIPtnvZf15J5EU</recordid><startdate>19970701</startdate><enddate>19970701</enddate><creator>Hudak, Mark L</creator><creator>Martin, David J</creator><creator>Egan, Edmund A</creator><creator>Matteson, Elizabeth J</creator><creator>Cummings, J</creator><creator>Jung, August L</creator><creator>Kimberlin, Lois V</creator><creator>Auten, Richard L</creator><creator>Rosenberg, Adam A</creator><creator>Asselin, Jeanette M</creator><creator>Belcastro, Marc R</creator><creator>Donohue, Pamela K</creator><creator>Hamm Jr, Charles R</creator><creator>Jansen, Robert D</creator><creator>Brody, Alan S</creator><creator>Riddlesberger, Merchline M</creator><creator>Montgomery, Paul</creator><general>Am Acad Pediatrics</general><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970701</creationdate><title>A Multicenter Randomized Masked Comparison Trial of Synthetic Surfactant Versus Calf Lung Surfactant Extract in the Prevention of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome</title><author>Hudak, Mark L ; Martin, David J ; Egan, Edmund A ; Matteson, Elizabeth J ; Cummings, J ; Jung, August L ; Kimberlin, Lois V ; Auten, Richard L ; Rosenberg, Adam A ; Asselin, Jeanette M ; Belcastro, Marc R ; Donohue, Pamela K ; Hamm Jr, Charles R ; Jansen, Robert D ; Brody, Alan S ; Riddlesberger, Merchline M ; Montgomery, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-d4a7de17167a1cb14c8721c22a949538e5ab8c72fb34b615ea9db09a25bdb8863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cerebral Hemorrhage - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fatty Alcohols - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Fatty Alcohols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fatty Alcohols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Lung surfactant, Synthetic</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Phosphorylcholine</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pulmonary Surfactants - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Pulmonary Surfactants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pulmonary Surfactants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>Respiratory distress syndrome</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - mortality</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Respiratory system</topic><topic>Synthetic lung surfactants</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hudak, Mark L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egan, Edmund A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matteson, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, August L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimberlin, Lois V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auten, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Adam A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asselin, Jeanette M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belcastro, Marc R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohue, Pamela K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamm Jr, Charles R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brody, Alan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riddlesberger, Merchline M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hudak, Mark L</au><au>Martin, David J</au><au>Egan, Edmund A</au><au>Matteson, Elizabeth J</au><au>Cummings, J</au><au>Jung, August L</au><au>Kimberlin, Lois V</au><au>Auten, Richard L</au><au>Rosenberg, Adam A</au><au>Asselin, Jeanette M</au><au>Belcastro, Marc R</au><au>Donohue, Pamela K</au><au>Hamm Jr, Charles R</au><au>Jansen, Robert D</au><au>Brody, Alan S</au><au>Riddlesberger, Merchline M</au><au>Montgomery, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Multicenter Randomized Masked Comparison Trial of Synthetic Surfactant Versus Calf Lung Surfactant Extract in the Prevention of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>1997-07-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>39-50</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><coden>PEDIAU</coden><abstract>To compare the efficacy and safety of a synthetic surfactant (Exosurf Neonatal, Burroughs Wellcome Co) and a surfactant extract of calf lung lavage (Infasurf, IND #27,169, ONY, Inc) in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Ten-center randomized masked comparison trial. Premature infants (n = 871) &lt;29 weeks gestational age by best obstetric estimate. Infants were randomly assigned to a course of treatment with Exosurf Neonatal (n = 438) or Infasurf (n = 433) at birth, and if still intubated, at 12 and 24 hours of age. Crossover treatment was allowed within 72 hours of age if severe respiratory failure (defined as two consecutive a/A PO2 ratios &lt;/=.10) persisted after three doses of the randomized surfactant. Three primary outcome measures of efficacy [the incidence of RDS; the incidence of RDS death; and the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days after birth] were compared using linear regression techniques. Of 871 randomized infants, 18 infants did not receive treatment with a study surfactant, and 25 infants did not meet all eligibility criteria. The primary analysis of efficacy was performed in the 846 eligible infants and analysis of safety outcomes in the 853 infants who received study surfactant. Demographic characteristics did not differ between the two treatment groups. Compared with Exosurf, Infasurf treatment resulted in a 62% decrease in the incidence of RDS (Infasurf, 16% vs Exosurf, 42%) and a 70% decrease in RDS death (Infasurf, 1.7% vs Exosurf, 5.4%) but did not increase the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days. Treatment with Infasurf resulted in significant improvement in several secondary outcome measures. Infasurf-treated infants had lower average FIO2 (Infasurf, .33 [SEM] vs Exosurf, .42; difference .08; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06 to .11) and average mean airway pressure (Infasurf, 6.0 cm H2O vs Exosurf, 7.1 cm H2O; difference 1.1 cm H2O; 95% CI, .7 to 1.6 cm H2O) for the first 72 hours of life. Crossover surfactant treatment was significantly less frequent in the Infasurf compared with the Exosurf group (Infasurf, 1% vs Exosurf, 6%). Complications (bradycardia, clinical airway obstruction, and transcutaneous arterial desaturation) associated with second and third, but not initial, surfactant treatments were observed more frequently in the Infasurf treatment group. Infasurf-treated infants had significantly less air leak (&lt;/=7 days) (Infasurf, 8% vs Exosurf, 14%; adjusted relative risk [ARR] .55; 95% CI, .37 to .81). Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (grade 3 and 4) did not differ between the two groups (Infasurf, 11.8% vs Exosurf, 8.3%; ARR 1.41; 95% CI, .94 to 2.09) but total IVH occurred more frequently in Infasurf-treated infants (Infasurf, 39.0% vs Exosurf, 29.9%; ARR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.57). Significant reductions in the incidence of RDS, the severity of early respiratory disease, the incidence of pulmonary air leaks associated with RDS, and the mortality attributable to RDS suggest that Infasurf is a more effective surfactant preparation than Exosurf Neonatal in the prophylaxis of RDS. However, Infasurf prophylaxis as used in this study was also associated with a greater risk of total but not severe IVH.</abstract><cop>Elk Grove Village, IL</cop><pub>Am Acad Pediatrics</pub><pmid>9200358</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.100.1.39</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 1997-07, Vol.100 (1), p.39-50
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_228352296
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Age Factors
Babies
Biological and medical sciences
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - prevention & control
Care and treatment
Cerebral Hemorrhage - prevention & control
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Drug Combinations
Evaluation
Fatty Alcohols - administration & dosage
Fatty Alcohols - adverse effects
Fatty Alcohols - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Linear Models
Lung surfactant, Synthetic
Lungs
Male
Medical research
Medical sciences
Pediatrics
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Phosphorylcholine
Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage
Polyethylene Glycols - adverse effects
Polyethylene Glycols - therapeutic use
Pulmonary Surfactants - administration & dosage
Pulmonary Surfactants - adverse effects
Pulmonary Surfactants - therapeutic use
Respiratory diseases
Respiratory distress syndrome
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - mortality
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - prevention & control
Respiratory system
Synthetic lung surfactants
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title A Multicenter Randomized Masked Comparison Trial of Synthetic Surfactant Versus Calf Lung Surfactant Extract in the Prevention of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A32%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Multicenter%20Randomized%20Masked%20Comparison%20Trial%20of%20Synthetic%20Surfactant%20Versus%20Calf%20Lung%20Surfactant%20Extract%20in%20the%20Prevention%20of%20Neonatal%20Respiratory%20Distress%20Syndrome&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Hudak,%20Mark%20L&rft.date=1997-07-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=39-50&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft.coden=PEDIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.100.1.39&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA19580499%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-d4a7de17167a1cb14c8721c22a949538e5ab8c72fb34b615ea9db09a25bdb8863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228352296&rft_id=info:pmid/9200358&rft_galeid=A19580499&rfr_iscdi=true