Loading…

The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives

Public authorities in infrastructure, aiming to facilitate societal initiatives, explore new forms of collaboration with nongovernmental actors. A comparative case study of two Dutch initiatives is conducted: energy generation at a public dam and the realization of a nature reserve. It is analyzed h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public works management & policy 2019-10, Vol.24 (4), p.344-367
Main Author: Grotenbreg, Sanne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013
container_end_page 367
container_issue 4
container_start_page 344
container_title Public works management & policy
container_volume 24
creator Grotenbreg, Sanne
description Public authorities in infrastructure, aiming to facilitate societal initiatives, explore new forms of collaboration with nongovernmental actors. A comparative case study of two Dutch initiatives is conducted: energy generation at a public dam and the realization of a nature reserve. It is analyzed how and why the authorities’ strategy regarding their nongovernmental partners changes over time. Authorities’ strategy change is modeled on two axes: governmental investments and governmental influence, and a differentiation is made between limited facilitation, invitational facilitation, partnering, and Design, Build, Finance, Maintain, and Operate. A U-turn-shaped pattern in authorities’ strategy is found: Authorities move from partnering to limited facilitation and subsequently revert to invitational facilitation. Institutional factors, process factors, and initiative characteristics are identified that explain the strategy changes. It is concluded that government facilitation is a dynamic, interactive process and that authorities adapt their strategy to the initiative at hand and are pragmatic in their approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1087724X19827026
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2283926547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1087724X19827026</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2283926547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPq0n2IxtvpdoPKHrZorclm07alHZTk2zF_96UigXB0wy833vDPIRuKbmnlPMHSkrOWfZORck4YcUZ6tE8ZwnPM3Ee9ygnB_0SXXm_JoSWpeA9ZKoV4HlSda7FpsVjuwfXbqENeCSV2Zggg7HtI57YT_zUBbXCbzKAw4MurKwzwYA_kYBfbLv8jZAbPG0jEiP24K_RhZYbDzc_s4_mo-dqOElmr-PpcDBLVJrTkEC-gEYJkFotyoIwIMAyzQpBlFYNZaqkBRAtlBZM0YI2pEklXyjV5ExoQtM-ujvm7pz96MCHem3jd_FkzViZClbkGY8UOVLKWe8d6HrnzFa6r5qS-lBo_bfQaEmOFi-XcAr9l_8GJMV3rA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283926547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Grotenbreg, Sanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Grotenbreg, Sanne</creatorcontrib><description>Public authorities in infrastructure, aiming to facilitate societal initiatives, explore new forms of collaboration with nongovernmental actors. A comparative case study of two Dutch initiatives is conducted: energy generation at a public dam and the realization of a nature reserve. It is analyzed how and why the authorities’ strategy regarding their nongovernmental partners changes over time. Authorities’ strategy change is modeled on two axes: governmental investments and governmental influence, and a differentiation is made between limited facilitation, invitational facilitation, partnering, and Design, Build, Finance, Maintain, and Operate. A U-turn-shaped pattern in authorities’ strategy is found: Authorities move from partnering to limited facilitation and subsequently revert to invitational facilitation. Institutional factors, process factors, and initiative characteristics are identified that explain the strategy changes. It is concluded that government facilitation is a dynamic, interactive process and that authorities adapt their strategy to the initiative at hand and are pragmatic in their approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-724X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1087724X19827026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Cooperation ; Differentiation ; Initiatives ; Investments ; Public works</subject><ispartof>Public works management &amp; policy, 2019-10, Vol.24 (4), p.344-367</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grotenbreg, Sanne</creatorcontrib><title>The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives</title><title>Public works management &amp; policy</title><description>Public authorities in infrastructure, aiming to facilitate societal initiatives, explore new forms of collaboration with nongovernmental actors. A comparative case study of two Dutch initiatives is conducted: energy generation at a public dam and the realization of a nature reserve. It is analyzed how and why the authorities’ strategy regarding their nongovernmental partners changes over time. Authorities’ strategy change is modeled on two axes: governmental investments and governmental influence, and a differentiation is made between limited facilitation, invitational facilitation, partnering, and Design, Build, Finance, Maintain, and Operate. A U-turn-shaped pattern in authorities’ strategy is found: Authorities move from partnering to limited facilitation and subsequently revert to invitational facilitation. Institutional factors, process factors, and initiative characteristics are identified that explain the strategy changes. It is concluded that government facilitation is a dynamic, interactive process and that authorities adapt their strategy to the initiative at hand and are pragmatic in their approach.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Initiatives</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Public works</subject><issn>1087-724X</issn><issn>1552-7549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPq0n2IxtvpdoPKHrZorclm07alHZTk2zF_96UigXB0wy833vDPIRuKbmnlPMHSkrOWfZORck4YcUZ6tE8ZwnPM3Ee9ygnB_0SXXm_JoSWpeA9ZKoV4HlSda7FpsVjuwfXbqENeCSV2Zggg7HtI57YT_zUBbXCbzKAw4MurKwzwYA_kYBfbLv8jZAbPG0jEiP24K_RhZYbDzc_s4_mo-dqOElmr-PpcDBLVJrTkEC-gEYJkFotyoIwIMAyzQpBlFYNZaqkBRAtlBZM0YI2pEklXyjV5ExoQtM-ujvm7pz96MCHem3jd_FkzViZClbkGY8UOVLKWe8d6HrnzFa6r5qS-lBo_bfQaEmOFi-XcAr9l_8GJMV3rA</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Grotenbreg, Sanne</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives</title><author>Grotenbreg, Sanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Initiatives</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Public works</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grotenbreg, Sanne</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public works management &amp; policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grotenbreg, Sanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives</atitle><jtitle>Public works management &amp; policy</jtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>344</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>344-367</pages><issn>1087-724X</issn><eissn>1552-7549</eissn><abstract>Public authorities in infrastructure, aiming to facilitate societal initiatives, explore new forms of collaboration with nongovernmental actors. A comparative case study of two Dutch initiatives is conducted: energy generation at a public dam and the realization of a nature reserve. It is analyzed how and why the authorities’ strategy regarding their nongovernmental partners changes over time. Authorities’ strategy change is modeled on two axes: governmental investments and governmental influence, and a differentiation is made between limited facilitation, invitational facilitation, partnering, and Design, Build, Finance, Maintain, and Operate. A U-turn-shaped pattern in authorities’ strategy is found: Authorities move from partnering to limited facilitation and subsequently revert to invitational facilitation. Institutional factors, process factors, and initiative characteristics are identified that explain the strategy changes. It is concluded that government facilitation is a dynamic, interactive process and that authorities adapt their strategy to the initiative at hand and are pragmatic in their approach.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1087724X19827026</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1087-724X
ispartof Public works management & policy, 2019-10, Vol.24 (4), p.344-367
issn 1087-724X
1552-7549
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2283926547
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sage Journals Online
subjects Case studies
Cooperation
Differentiation
Initiatives
Investments
Public works
title The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A24%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20U-Turn%20in%20Government%20Facilitation:%20How%20Dutch%20Water%20Authorities%20Facilitate%20Nongovernmental%20Initiatives&rft.jtitle=Public%20works%20management%20&%20policy&rft.au=Grotenbreg,%20Sanne&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=344&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=344-367&rft.issn=1087-724X&rft.eissn=1552-7549&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1087724X19827026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2283926547%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283926547&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1087724X19827026&rfr_iscdi=true