Loading…
The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives
Public authorities in infrastructure, aiming to facilitate societal initiatives, explore new forms of collaboration with nongovernmental actors. A comparative case study of two Dutch initiatives is conducted: energy generation at a public dam and the realization of a nature reserve. It is analyzed h...
Saved in:
Published in: | Public works management & policy 2019-10, Vol.24 (4), p.344-367 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013 |
container_end_page | 367 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 344 |
container_title | Public works management & policy |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Grotenbreg, Sanne |
description | Public authorities in infrastructure, aiming to facilitate societal initiatives, explore new forms of collaboration with nongovernmental actors. A comparative case study of two Dutch initiatives is conducted: energy generation at a public dam and the realization of a nature reserve. It is analyzed how and why the authorities’ strategy regarding their nongovernmental partners changes over time. Authorities’ strategy change is modeled on two axes: governmental investments and governmental influence, and a differentiation is made between limited facilitation, invitational facilitation, partnering, and Design, Build, Finance, Maintain, and Operate. A U-turn-shaped pattern in authorities’ strategy is found: Authorities move from partnering to limited facilitation and subsequently revert to invitational facilitation. Institutional factors, process factors, and initiative characteristics are identified that explain the strategy changes. It is concluded that government facilitation is a dynamic, interactive process and that authorities adapt their strategy to the initiative at hand and are pragmatic in their approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1087724X19827026 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2283926547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1087724X19827026</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2283926547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPq0n2IxtvpdoPKHrZorclm07alHZTk2zF_96UigXB0wy833vDPIRuKbmnlPMHSkrOWfZORck4YcUZ6tE8ZwnPM3Ee9ygnB_0SXXm_JoSWpeA9ZKoV4HlSda7FpsVjuwfXbqENeCSV2Zggg7HtI57YT_zUBbXCbzKAw4MurKwzwYA_kYBfbLv8jZAbPG0jEiP24K_RhZYbDzc_s4_mo-dqOElmr-PpcDBLVJrTkEC-gEYJkFotyoIwIMAyzQpBlFYNZaqkBRAtlBZM0YI2pEklXyjV5ExoQtM-ujvm7pz96MCHem3jd_FkzViZClbkGY8UOVLKWe8d6HrnzFa6r5qS-lBo_bfQaEmOFi-XcAr9l_8GJMV3rA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283926547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Grotenbreg, Sanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Grotenbreg, Sanne</creatorcontrib><description>Public authorities in infrastructure, aiming to facilitate societal initiatives, explore new forms of collaboration with nongovernmental actors. A comparative case study of two Dutch initiatives is conducted: energy generation at a public dam and the realization of a nature reserve. It is analyzed how and why the authorities’ strategy regarding their nongovernmental partners changes over time. Authorities’ strategy change is modeled on two axes: governmental investments and governmental influence, and a differentiation is made between limited facilitation, invitational facilitation, partnering, and Design, Build, Finance, Maintain, and Operate. A U-turn-shaped pattern in authorities’ strategy is found: Authorities move from partnering to limited facilitation and subsequently revert to invitational facilitation. Institutional factors, process factors, and initiative characteristics are identified that explain the strategy changes. It is concluded that government facilitation is a dynamic, interactive process and that authorities adapt their strategy to the initiative at hand and are pragmatic in their approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-724X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1087724X19827026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Cooperation ; Differentiation ; Initiatives ; Investments ; Public works</subject><ispartof>Public works management & policy, 2019-10, Vol.24 (4), p.344-367</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grotenbreg, Sanne</creatorcontrib><title>The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives</title><title>Public works management & policy</title><description>Public authorities in infrastructure, aiming to facilitate societal initiatives, explore new forms of collaboration with nongovernmental actors. A comparative case study of two Dutch initiatives is conducted: energy generation at a public dam and the realization of a nature reserve. It is analyzed how and why the authorities’ strategy regarding their nongovernmental partners changes over time. Authorities’ strategy change is modeled on two axes: governmental investments and governmental influence, and a differentiation is made between limited facilitation, invitational facilitation, partnering, and Design, Build, Finance, Maintain, and Operate. A U-turn-shaped pattern in authorities’ strategy is found: Authorities move from partnering to limited facilitation and subsequently revert to invitational facilitation. Institutional factors, process factors, and initiative characteristics are identified that explain the strategy changes. It is concluded that government facilitation is a dynamic, interactive process and that authorities adapt their strategy to the initiative at hand and are pragmatic in their approach.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Initiatives</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Public works</subject><issn>1087-724X</issn><issn>1552-7549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPq0n2IxtvpdoPKHrZorclm07alHZTk2zF_96UigXB0wy833vDPIRuKbmnlPMHSkrOWfZORck4YcUZ6tE8ZwnPM3Ee9ygnB_0SXXm_JoSWpeA9ZKoV4HlSda7FpsVjuwfXbqENeCSV2Zggg7HtI57YT_zUBbXCbzKAw4MurKwzwYA_kYBfbLv8jZAbPG0jEiP24K_RhZYbDzc_s4_mo-dqOElmr-PpcDBLVJrTkEC-gEYJkFotyoIwIMAyzQpBlFYNZaqkBRAtlBZM0YI2pEklXyjV5ExoQtM-ujvm7pz96MCHem3jd_FkzViZClbkGY8UOVLKWe8d6HrnzFa6r5qS-lBo_bfQaEmOFi-XcAr9l_8GJMV3rA</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Grotenbreg, Sanne</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives</title><author>Grotenbreg, Sanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Initiatives</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Public works</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grotenbreg, Sanne</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public works management & policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grotenbreg, Sanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives</atitle><jtitle>Public works management & policy</jtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>344</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>344-367</pages><issn>1087-724X</issn><eissn>1552-7549</eissn><abstract>Public authorities in infrastructure, aiming to facilitate societal initiatives, explore new forms of collaboration with nongovernmental actors. A comparative case study of two Dutch initiatives is conducted: energy generation at a public dam and the realization of a nature reserve. It is analyzed how and why the authorities’ strategy regarding their nongovernmental partners changes over time. Authorities’ strategy change is modeled on two axes: governmental investments and governmental influence, and a differentiation is made between limited facilitation, invitational facilitation, partnering, and Design, Build, Finance, Maintain, and Operate. A U-turn-shaped pattern in authorities’ strategy is found: Authorities move from partnering to limited facilitation and subsequently revert to invitational facilitation. Institutional factors, process factors, and initiative characteristics are identified that explain the strategy changes. It is concluded that government facilitation is a dynamic, interactive process and that authorities adapt their strategy to the initiative at hand and are pragmatic in their approach.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1087724X19827026</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1087-724X |
ispartof | Public works management & policy, 2019-10, Vol.24 (4), p.344-367 |
issn | 1087-724X 1552-7549 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2283926547 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Case studies Cooperation Differentiation Initiatives Investments Public works |
title | The U-Turn in Government Facilitation: How Dutch Water Authorities Facilitate Nongovernmental Initiatives |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A24%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20U-Turn%20in%20Government%20Facilitation:%20How%20Dutch%20Water%20Authorities%20Facilitate%20Nongovernmental%20Initiatives&rft.jtitle=Public%20works%20management%20&%20policy&rft.au=Grotenbreg,%20Sanne&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=344&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=344-367&rft.issn=1087-724X&rft.eissn=1552-7549&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1087724X19827026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2283926547%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5debc9eafcd8602e0e24f2690cfcb12c816e0f9cf92c161b0b3a7dccb529f013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283926547&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1087724X19827026&rfr_iscdi=true |