Unevenness and deservingness: regional differentiation in contemporary Italy

This article challenges "regionalist" approaches to spatial transformation and capitalist development. Drawing on the comparative analysis of two mid-size towns in the North and South of Italy, the article brings into light the "critical junctions" articulating local and global p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dialectical anthropology 2019-12, Vol.43 (4), p.417-436
Main Authors: Loperfido, Giacomo, Pusceddu, Antonio Maria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accumulation
Anthropology
Capital formation
Capitalism
Common sense
Comparative analysis
Deservingness
Differentiation
Economic models
Field study
Geography
Global economy
Global local relationship
Globalization
Hostility
Ideology
Industrialization
North and South
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Power
Regions
Social interaction
Social Sciences
Towns
Transformation
Translation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article challenges "regionalist" approaches to spatial transformation and capitalist development. Drawing on the comparative analysis of two mid-size towns in the North and South of Italy, the article brings into light the "critical junctions" articulating local and global processes, showing how people and places are connected to larger fields of power, differently situated in the geography of capital accumulation, and how connectedness and situatedness are intimately coherent with the unevenness and disjuncture of global capitalism. By bringing into comparison a "successful" story of flexible accumulation and a case of "peripheralization" alongside the decline of state-driven industrialization, our goal is to highlight how unevenness and deservingness are mutually produced, as well as how their entanglement is enmeshed in the formation of spatialized cosmologies of difference. Our analysis deconstructs the essentializing notions of the North as "hospitable" and South as "hostile" to capital, by showing, first, the different scales at which unevenness is produced and, second, the interplay of erudite economic models and popular common sense in capital's unfolding moral geographies. Finally, the comparison points to unevenness and deservingness as the products of geographically larger and historically deeper relations and connections and shows how the state is the fundamental agent translating them into both spatial and cultural differentiation.
ISSN:0304-4092
1573-0786
DOI:10.1007/s10624-019-09556-3