Loading…

Do Auction Parameters Affect Buyer Surplus in E-Auctions for Procurement?

Although the initial euphoria about Internet‐enabled reverse auctions has given way to a cautious but widespread use of reverse auctions in business‐to‐business (B2B) procurement, there is a limited understanding of the effect of auction design parameters on buyer surplus. In this paper, we study th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Production and operations management 2007-07, Vol.16 (4), p.455-470
Main Authors: Mithas, Sunil, Jones, Joni L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5895-43182e71bbf0684e84f26527789cdaf06737c6ca93e4eca2ce3a026648dc8d363
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5895-43182e71bbf0684e84f26527789cdaf06737c6ca93e4eca2ce3a026648dc8d363
container_end_page 470
container_issue 4
container_start_page 455
container_title Production and operations management
container_volume 16
creator Mithas, Sunil
Jones, Joni L.
description Although the initial euphoria about Internet‐enabled reverse auctions has given way to a cautious but widespread use of reverse auctions in business‐to‐business (B2B) procurement, there is a limited understanding of the effect of auction design parameters on buyer surplus. In this paper, we study the effect of bidding competition, information asymmetry, reserve price, bid decrement, auction duration, and bidder type on buyer surplus. We collected field data on more than 700 online procurement auctions conducted by a leading auctioneer and involving procurement items worth millions of dollars. Consistent with the predictions of auction theory, the results indicate that bidding competition, reserve price, and information sharing affect buyer surplus. Unlike previous findings in the consumer‐to‐consumer context, we find that bid decrement and auction duration have no effect in B2B procurement auctions. Our results suggest that use of the rank‐bidding format increases buyer surplus when incumbent suppliers participate in the auction. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of these findings for future research and for optimal design of online procurement auctions.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00272.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_228785303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A169445577</galeid><sage_id>10.1111_j.1937-5956.2007.tb00272.x</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A169445577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5895-43182e71bbf0684e84f26527789cdaf06737c6ca93e4eca2ce3a026648dc8d363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV1r2zAUhs3YYF23_yC6a3uyPix5NyVLuq6sH4G2FHZzUJSj4Cy2M8lmyb-fjEPHIBeddCFx9LzvEedNkrOcZnlcn9ZZXnKVylIWGaNUZd2CUqZYtnuVnDw_vY53Kss0F0q_Td6FsKaR5YyeJFezlkx621VtQ-bGmxo79IFMnEPbkS_9Hj257_120wdSNeQiPcCBuNaTuW9t77HGpjt_n7xxZhPww-E8TR6_XjxMv6XXd5dX08l1aqUuZSp4rhmqfLFwtNACtXCskEwpXdqliTXFlS2sKTkKtIZZ5IayohB6afWSF_w0ORt9t7791WPoYN32voktgTGttOSUR-jjCK3MBqFqXNt5Y-sqWJjkRSmElEpFKj1CrbBBbzZtg66K5X_47Agf9xLryh4VfB4F1rcheHSw9VVt_B5yCkOAsIYhJRhSgiFAOAQIuyg-H8W_o-v-P5Qwv7u5jx-IDmp0CGaFf8f0ot6HyVShw91zb-N_whCQhKfbS3gof3yfidspzPgf_DXACw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228785303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Auction Parameters Affect Buyer Surplus in E-Auctions for Procurement?</title><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><creator>Mithas, Sunil ; Jones, Joni L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mithas, Sunil ; Jones, Joni L.</creatorcontrib><description>Although the initial euphoria about Internet‐enabled reverse auctions has given way to a cautious but widespread use of reverse auctions in business‐to‐business (B2B) procurement, there is a limited understanding of the effect of auction design parameters on buyer surplus. In this paper, we study the effect of bidding competition, information asymmetry, reserve price, bid decrement, auction duration, and bidder type on buyer surplus. We collected field data on more than 700 online procurement auctions conducted by a leading auctioneer and involving procurement items worth millions of dollars. Consistent with the predictions of auction theory, the results indicate that bidding competition, reserve price, and information sharing affect buyer surplus. Unlike previous findings in the consumer‐to‐consumer context, we find that bid decrement and auction duration have no effect in B2B procurement auctions. Our results suggest that use of the rank‐bidding format increases buyer surplus when incumbent suppliers participate in the auction. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of these findings for future research and for optimal design of online procurement auctions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-1478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-5956</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00272.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POMAEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Auctions ; Bids ; Business to business commerce ; business value of information technology ; buyer surplus ; Cost control ; Electronic commerce ; Electronic procurement ; Experiments ; Hypotheses ; Information technology ; Internet ; internet-enabled procurement auctions ; Laboratories ; Operations management ; Prices ; Purchasing ; reverse auctions ; Studies ; Suppliers ; Supply chain management</subject><ispartof>Production and operations management, 2007-07, Vol.16 (4), p.455-470</ispartof><rights>2007 The Authors</rights><rights>2007 Production and Operations Management Society</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Production and Operations Management Society Jul/Aug 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5895-43182e71bbf0684e84f26527789cdaf06737c6ca93e4eca2ce3a026648dc8d363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5895-43182e71bbf0684e84f26527789cdaf06737c6ca93e4eca2ce3a026648dc8d363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/228785303/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/228785303?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,27923,27924,36059,44362,74666</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mithas, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Joni L.</creatorcontrib><title>Do Auction Parameters Affect Buyer Surplus in E-Auctions for Procurement?</title><title>Production and operations management</title><description>Although the initial euphoria about Internet‐enabled reverse auctions has given way to a cautious but widespread use of reverse auctions in business‐to‐business (B2B) procurement, there is a limited understanding of the effect of auction design parameters on buyer surplus. In this paper, we study the effect of bidding competition, information asymmetry, reserve price, bid decrement, auction duration, and bidder type on buyer surplus. We collected field data on more than 700 online procurement auctions conducted by a leading auctioneer and involving procurement items worth millions of dollars. Consistent with the predictions of auction theory, the results indicate that bidding competition, reserve price, and information sharing affect buyer surplus. Unlike previous findings in the consumer‐to‐consumer context, we find that bid decrement and auction duration have no effect in B2B procurement auctions. Our results suggest that use of the rank‐bidding format increases buyer surplus when incumbent suppliers participate in the auction. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of these findings for future research and for optimal design of online procurement auctions.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Business to business commerce</subject><subject>business value of information technology</subject><subject>buyer surplus</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>Electronic procurement</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>internet-enabled procurement auctions</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Operations management</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>reverse auctions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><issn>1059-1478</issn><issn>1937-5956</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV1r2zAUhs3YYF23_yC6a3uyPix5NyVLuq6sH4G2FHZzUJSj4Cy2M8lmyb-fjEPHIBeddCFx9LzvEedNkrOcZnlcn9ZZXnKVylIWGaNUZd2CUqZYtnuVnDw_vY53Kss0F0q_Td6FsKaR5YyeJFezlkx621VtQ-bGmxo79IFMnEPbkS_9Hj257_120wdSNeQiPcCBuNaTuW9t77HGpjt_n7xxZhPww-E8TR6_XjxMv6XXd5dX08l1aqUuZSp4rhmqfLFwtNACtXCskEwpXdqliTXFlS2sKTkKtIZZ5IayohB6afWSF_w0ORt9t7791WPoYN32voktgTGttOSUR-jjCK3MBqFqXNt5Y-sqWJjkRSmElEpFKj1CrbBBbzZtg66K5X_47Agf9xLryh4VfB4F1rcheHSw9VVt_B5yCkOAsIYhJRhSgiFAOAQIuyg-H8W_o-v-P5Qwv7u5jx-IDmp0CGaFf8f0ot6HyVShw91zb-N_whCQhKfbS3gof3yfidspzPgf_DXACw</recordid><startdate>200707</startdate><enddate>200707</enddate><creator>Mithas, Sunil</creator><creator>Jones, Joni L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200707</creationdate><title>Do Auction Parameters Affect Buyer Surplus in E-Auctions for Procurement?</title><author>Mithas, Sunil ; Jones, Joni L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5895-43182e71bbf0684e84f26527789cdaf06737c6ca93e4eca2ce3a026648dc8d363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Business to business commerce</topic><topic>business value of information technology</topic><topic>buyer surplus</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>Electronic procurement</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>internet-enabled procurement auctions</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Operations management</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>reverse auctions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mithas, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Joni L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Production and operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mithas, Sunil</au><au>Jones, Joni L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Auction Parameters Affect Buyer Surplus in E-Auctions for Procurement?</atitle><jtitle>Production and operations management</jtitle><date>2007-07</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>455-470</pages><issn>1059-1478</issn><eissn>1937-5956</eissn><coden>POMAEN</coden><abstract>Although the initial euphoria about Internet‐enabled reverse auctions has given way to a cautious but widespread use of reverse auctions in business‐to‐business (B2B) procurement, there is a limited understanding of the effect of auction design parameters on buyer surplus. In this paper, we study the effect of bidding competition, information asymmetry, reserve price, bid decrement, auction duration, and bidder type on buyer surplus. We collected field data on more than 700 online procurement auctions conducted by a leading auctioneer and involving procurement items worth millions of dollars. Consistent with the predictions of auction theory, the results indicate that bidding competition, reserve price, and information sharing affect buyer surplus. Unlike previous findings in the consumer‐to‐consumer context, we find that bid decrement and auction duration have no effect in B2B procurement auctions. Our results suggest that use of the rank‐bidding format increases buyer surplus when incumbent suppliers participate in the auction. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of these findings for future research and for optimal design of online procurement auctions.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00272.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-1478
ispartof Production and operations management, 2007-07, Vol.16 (4), p.455-470
issn 1059-1478
1937-5956
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_228785303
source ABI/INFORM Collection; Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】
subjects Analysis
Auctions
Bids
Business to business commerce
business value of information technology
buyer surplus
Cost control
Electronic commerce
Electronic procurement
Experiments
Hypotheses
Information technology
Internet
internet-enabled procurement auctions
Laboratories
Operations management
Prices
Purchasing
reverse auctions
Studies
Suppliers
Supply chain management
title Do Auction Parameters Affect Buyer Surplus in E-Auctions for Procurement?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T08%3A35%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Auction%20Parameters%20Affect%20Buyer%20Surplus%20in%20E-Auctions%20for%20Procurement?&rft.jtitle=Production%20and%20operations%20management&rft.au=Mithas,%20Sunil&rft.date=2007-07&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=455-470&rft.issn=1059-1478&rft.eissn=1937-5956&rft.coden=POMAEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00272.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA169445577%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5895-43182e71bbf0684e84f26527789cdaf06737c6ca93e4eca2ce3a026648dc8d363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228785303&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A169445577&rft_sage_id=10.1111_j.1937-5956.2007.tb00272.x&rfr_iscdi=true