Loading…
Toward an understanding of the variety in work arrangements: The organization and labor relationships framework
Alternative work arrangements are on the rise. Organizations in retail sales, entertainment and financial services hire lessees, requiring them to pay a fee to use equipment, materials, and space. Organizations are now "renting' senior executives and even CEOs. Perhaps most commonly, organ...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of organizational behavior 1996-01, Vol.3, p.99 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | |
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 99 |
| container_title | Journal of organizational behavior |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Sherer, Peter D |
| description | Alternative work arrangements are on the rise. Organizations in retail sales, entertainment and financial services hire lessees, requiring them to pay a fee to use equipment, materials, and space. Organizations are now "renting' senior executives and even CEOs. Perhaps most commonly, organizations are using teams with self-management. The ascendance of these and other alternative arrangements suggest that the time is ripe to move toward a greater understanding of the variety in work arrangements. The internal labor market framework has been the foundation for much of the study on the variety in work arrangements. This framework cannot no longer be relied upon. Studying the variety in work arrangements calls for a broader perspective, one that addresses non-standard variants of employment and non-employment relationships involving labor in organizations. A framework on organization and labor relationships (OLR) is presented. With this framework, it is shown that underlying the variety of work arrangements are 3 distinct forms of agency, embodied in 3 organizations and labor relationships. |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_228796519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11106542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p549-ed013fdaeccfe41a5ff8787cbeb8f4cd2926e3e4f3c40566284c32799fa8ca693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMoWFf_Q_BeSJu0TbzJ4hcseOl9mSaTbtduUpPURX-91fXuaV6Gh2eG94xkBVMqL3ijzknGpBL5EutLchXjnjFWCVVnxLf-CMFQcHR2BkNM4MzgeuotTTukHxAGTJ90cPTowxuFEMD1eECX4h1tF8KHHtzwBWnwbtEYOkLnAw04_q7ibpgitQEO-CO4JhcWxog3f3NF2seHdv2cb16fXtb3m3xa_srRsIJbA6i1RVFAZa1sZKM77KQV2pSqrJGjsFwLVtV1KYXmZaOUBamhVnxFbk_aKfj3GWPa7v0c3HJxW5ZyqaEq_oGElJXiin8DAMBkpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228796519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward an understanding of the variety in work arrangements: The organization and labor relationships framework</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Sherer, Peter D</creator><creatorcontrib>Sherer, Peter D</creatorcontrib><description>Alternative work arrangements are on the rise. Organizations in retail sales, entertainment and financial services hire lessees, requiring them to pay a fee to use equipment, materials, and space. Organizations are now "renting' senior executives and even CEOs. Perhaps most commonly, organizations are using teams with self-management. The ascendance of these and other alternative arrangements suggest that the time is ripe to move toward a greater understanding of the variety in work arrangements. The internal labor market framework has been the foundation for much of the study on the variety in work arrangements. This framework cannot no longer be relied upon. Studying the variety in work arrangements calls for a broader perspective, one that addresses non-standard variants of employment and non-employment relationships involving labor in organizations. A framework on organization and labor relationships (OLR) is presented. With this framework, it is shown that underlying the variety of work arrangements are 3 distinct forms of agency, embodied in 3 organizations and labor relationships.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1379</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JORBEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Agency theory ; Employees ; Employment ; Labor market ; Organization theory ; Organizational behavior ; Teams</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational behavior, 1996-01, Vol.3, p.99</ispartof><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/228796519?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,11906,12846,21376,21394,21395,30999,33611,33769,34530,36050,36060,43733,43814,44115,44361,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sherer, Peter D</creatorcontrib><title>Toward an understanding of the variety in work arrangements: The organization and labor relationships framework</title><title>Journal of organizational behavior</title><description>Alternative work arrangements are on the rise. Organizations in retail sales, entertainment and financial services hire lessees, requiring them to pay a fee to use equipment, materials, and space. Organizations are now "renting' senior executives and even CEOs. Perhaps most commonly, organizations are using teams with self-management. The ascendance of these and other alternative arrangements suggest that the time is ripe to move toward a greater understanding of the variety in work arrangements. The internal labor market framework has been the foundation for much of the study on the variety in work arrangements. This framework cannot no longer be relied upon. Studying the variety in work arrangements calls for a broader perspective, one that addresses non-standard variants of employment and non-employment relationships involving labor in organizations. A framework on organization and labor relationships (OLR) is presented. With this framework, it is shown that underlying the variety of work arrangements are 3 distinct forms of agency, embodied in 3 organizations and labor relationships.</description><subject>Agency theory</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>0894-3796</issn><issn>1099-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0A</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMoWFf_Q_BeSJu0TbzJ4hcseOl9mSaTbtduUpPURX-91fXuaV6Gh2eG94xkBVMqL3ijzknGpBL5EutLchXjnjFWCVVnxLf-CMFQcHR2BkNM4MzgeuotTTukHxAGTJ90cPTowxuFEMD1eECX4h1tF8KHHtzwBWnwbtEYOkLnAw04_q7ibpgitQEO-CO4JhcWxog3f3NF2seHdv2cb16fXtb3m3xa_srRsIJbA6i1RVFAZa1sZKM77KQV2pSqrJGjsFwLVtV1KYXmZaOUBamhVnxFbk_aKfj3GWPa7v0c3HJxW5ZyqaEq_oGElJXiin8DAMBkpw</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Sherer, Peter D</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Toward an understanding of the variety in work arrangements: The organization and labor relationships framework</title><author>Sherer, Peter D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p549-ed013fdaeccfe41a5ff8787cbeb8f4cd2926e3e4f3c40566284c32799fa8ca693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Agency theory</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sherer, Peter D</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sherer, Peter D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward an understanding of the variety in work arrangements: The organization and labor relationships framework</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>3</volume><spage>99</spage><pages>99-</pages><issn>0894-3796</issn><eissn>1099-1379</eissn><coden>JORBEJ</coden><abstract>Alternative work arrangements are on the rise. Organizations in retail sales, entertainment and financial services hire lessees, requiring them to pay a fee to use equipment, materials, and space. Organizations are now "renting' senior executives and even CEOs. Perhaps most commonly, organizations are using teams with self-management. The ascendance of these and other alternative arrangements suggest that the time is ripe to move toward a greater understanding of the variety in work arrangements. The internal labor market framework has been the foundation for much of the study on the variety in work arrangements. This framework cannot no longer be relied upon. Studying the variety in work arrangements calls for a broader perspective, one that addresses non-standard variants of employment and non-employment relationships involving labor in organizations. A framework on organization and labor relationships (OLR) is presented. With this framework, it is shown that underlying the variety of work arrangements are 3 distinct forms of agency, embodied in 3 organizations and labor relationships.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0894-3796 |
| ispartof | Journal of organizational behavior, 1996-01, Vol.3, p.99 |
| issn | 0894-3796 1099-1379 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_228796519 |
| source | Criminology Collection; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); ABI/INFORM Global; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; JSTOR Archival Journals |
| subjects | Agency theory Employees Employment Labor market Organization theory Organizational behavior Teams |
| title | Toward an understanding of the variety in work arrangements: The organization and labor relationships framework |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A59%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20an%20understanding%20of%20the%20variety%20in%20work%20arrangements:%20The%20organization%20and%20labor%20relationships%20framework&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20behavior&rft.au=Sherer,%20Peter%20D&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.spage=99&rft.pages=99-&rft.issn=0894-3796&rft.eissn=1099-1379&rft.coden=JORBEJ&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E11106542%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p549-ed013fdaeccfe41a5ff8787cbeb8f4cd2926e3e4f3c40566284c32799fa8ca693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228796519&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |