Loading…
Experimental parameter uncertainty in PEM fuel cell modeling. Part I: Scatter in material parameterization
Ever since modeling has become a mature part of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) research and development, it has been plagued by significant uncertainty lying in the detailed knowledge of material properties required. Experimental data published on several transport coefficients are scatt...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2018-11 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Vetter, Roman Schumacher, Jürgen O |
description | Ever since modeling has become a mature part of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) research and development, it has been plagued by significant uncertainty lying in the detailed knowledge of material properties required. Experimental data published on several transport coefficients are scattered over orders of magnitude, even for the most extensively studied materials such as Nafion membranes, for instance. For PEMFC performance models to become predictive, high-quality input data is essential. In this bipartite paper series, we determine the most critical transport parameters for which accurate experimental characterization is required in order to enable performance prediction with sufficient confidence from small to large current densities. In the first part, a macro-homogeneous two-phase membrane-electrode assembly model is furnished with a comprehensive set of material parameterizations from the experimental and modeling literature. The computational model is applied to demonstrate the large spread in performance prediction resulting from experimentally measured or validated material parameterizations alone. The result of this is a ranking list of material properties, sorted by induced spread in the fuel cell performance curve. The three most influential parameters in this list stem from membrane properties: The Fickean diffusivity of dissolved water, the protonic conductivity and the electro-osmotic drag coefficient. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.1811.10091 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2288299331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2288299331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a521-3873d10adb938eebab3fddd928e8e957cc8e0e0c81f95abba6e94638f9525db73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUEtLw0AYXATBUvsDvC14TtxHNtn1JqVqoWLB3suX7BfZkGziZiPVX2-KHjzNDMwDhpAbztJMK8XuIJzcZ8o15ylnzPALshBS8kRnQlyR1Tg2jDGRF0IpuSDN5jRgcB36CC0dIECHEQOdfIUhgvPxizpP95sXWk_Y0grblna9xdb595TuIUS6vadvFcRzbLZ2MBP3v8x9Q3S9vyaXNbQjrv5wSQ6Pm8P6Odm9Pm3XD7sElOCJ1IW0nIEtjdSIJZSyttYaoVGjUUVVaWTIKs1ro6AsIUeT5VLPSihbFnJJbn9rh9B_TDjGY9NPwc-LRyG0FsbMb8gfYKVbJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2288299331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental parameter uncertainty in PEM fuel cell modeling. Part I: Scatter in material parameterization</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Vetter, Roman ; Schumacher, Jürgen O</creator><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Roman ; Schumacher, Jürgen O</creatorcontrib><description>Ever since modeling has become a mature part of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) research and development, it has been plagued by significant uncertainty lying in the detailed knowledge of material properties required. Experimental data published on several transport coefficients are scattered over orders of magnitude, even for the most extensively studied materials such as Nafion membranes, for instance. For PEMFC performance models to become predictive, high-quality input data is essential. In this bipartite paper series, we determine the most critical transport parameters for which accurate experimental characterization is required in order to enable performance prediction with sufficient confidence from small to large current densities. In the first part, a macro-homogeneous two-phase membrane-electrode assembly model is furnished with a comprehensive set of material parameterizations from the experimental and modeling literature. The computational model is applied to demonstrate the large spread in performance prediction resulting from experimentally measured or validated material parameterizations alone. The result of this is a ranking list of material properties, sorted by induced spread in the fuel cell performance curve. The three most influential parameters in this list stem from membrane properties: The Fickean diffusivity of dissolved water, the protonic conductivity and the electro-osmotic drag coefficient.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1811.10091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Drag coefficients ; Fuel cells ; Material properties ; Mathematical models ; Parameter uncertainty ; Parameterization ; Performance prediction ; Proton exchange membrane fuel cells ; R&D ; Research & development ; Transport properties</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2018-11</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2288299331?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,780,25732,27904,36991,44569</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumacher, Jürgen O</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental parameter uncertainty in PEM fuel cell modeling. Part I: Scatter in material parameterization</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Ever since modeling has become a mature part of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) research and development, it has been plagued by significant uncertainty lying in the detailed knowledge of material properties required. Experimental data published on several transport coefficients are scattered over orders of magnitude, even for the most extensively studied materials such as Nafion membranes, for instance. For PEMFC performance models to become predictive, high-quality input data is essential. In this bipartite paper series, we determine the most critical transport parameters for which accurate experimental characterization is required in order to enable performance prediction with sufficient confidence from small to large current densities. In the first part, a macro-homogeneous two-phase membrane-electrode assembly model is furnished with a comprehensive set of material parameterizations from the experimental and modeling literature. The computational model is applied to demonstrate the large spread in performance prediction resulting from experimentally measured or validated material parameterizations alone. The result of this is a ranking list of material properties, sorted by induced spread in the fuel cell performance curve. The three most influential parameters in this list stem from membrane properties: The Fickean diffusivity of dissolved water, the protonic conductivity and the electro-osmotic drag coefficient.</description><subject>Drag coefficients</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Material properties</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Proton exchange membrane fuel cells</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Transport properties</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUEtLw0AYXATBUvsDvC14TtxHNtn1JqVqoWLB3suX7BfZkGziZiPVX2-KHjzNDMwDhpAbztJMK8XuIJzcZ8o15ylnzPALshBS8kRnQlyR1Tg2jDGRF0IpuSDN5jRgcB36CC0dIECHEQOdfIUhgvPxizpP95sXWk_Y0grblna9xdb595TuIUS6vadvFcRzbLZ2MBP3v8x9Q3S9vyaXNbQjrv5wSQ6Pm8P6Odm9Pm3XD7sElOCJ1IW0nIEtjdSIJZSyttYaoVGjUUVVaWTIKs1ro6AsIUeT5VLPSihbFnJJbn9rh9B_TDjGY9NPwc-LRyG0FsbMb8gfYKVbJQ</recordid><startdate>20181125</startdate><enddate>20181125</enddate><creator>Vetter, Roman</creator><creator>Schumacher, Jürgen O</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181125</creationdate><title>Experimental parameter uncertainty in PEM fuel cell modeling. Part I: Scatter in material parameterization</title><author>Vetter, Roman ; Schumacher, Jürgen O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a521-3873d10adb938eebab3fddd928e8e957cc8e0e0c81f95abba6e94638f9525db73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Drag coefficients</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Material properties</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Proton exchange membrane fuel cells</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Transport properties</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumacher, Jürgen O</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vetter, Roman</au><au>Schumacher, Jürgen O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental parameter uncertainty in PEM fuel cell modeling. Part I: Scatter in material parameterization</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2018-11-25</date><risdate>2018</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Ever since modeling has become a mature part of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) research and development, it has been plagued by significant uncertainty lying in the detailed knowledge of material properties required. Experimental data published on several transport coefficients are scattered over orders of magnitude, even for the most extensively studied materials such as Nafion membranes, for instance. For PEMFC performance models to become predictive, high-quality input data is essential. In this bipartite paper series, we determine the most critical transport parameters for which accurate experimental characterization is required in order to enable performance prediction with sufficient confidence from small to large current densities. In the first part, a macro-homogeneous two-phase membrane-electrode assembly model is furnished with a comprehensive set of material parameterizations from the experimental and modeling literature. The computational model is applied to demonstrate the large spread in performance prediction resulting from experimentally measured or validated material parameterizations alone. The result of this is a ranking list of material properties, sorted by induced spread in the fuel cell performance curve. The three most influential parameters in this list stem from membrane properties: The Fickean diffusivity of dissolved water, the protonic conductivity and the electro-osmotic drag coefficient.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1811.10091</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2018-11 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2288299331 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Drag coefficients Fuel cells Material properties Mathematical models Parameter uncertainty Parameterization Performance prediction Proton exchange membrane fuel cells R&D Research & development Transport properties |
title | Experimental parameter uncertainty in PEM fuel cell modeling. Part I: Scatter in material parameterization |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A59%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20parameter%20uncertainty%20in%20PEM%20fuel%20cell%20modeling.%20Part%20I:%20Scatter%20in%20material%20parameterization&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Vetter,%20Roman&rft.date=2018-11-25&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1811.10091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2288299331%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a521-3873d10adb938eebab3fddd928e8e957cc8e0e0c81f95abba6e94638f9525db73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2288299331&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |