Evaluating functional recovery of habitat for threatened woodland caribou

• Published in: Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) D.C), 2017-09, Vol.8 (9), p.n/a
• Main Authors: Dickie, Melanie, Serrouya, Robert, DeMars, Craig, Cranston, Jerome, Boutin, Stan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Canis lupus; Environmental protection; Environmental restoration; Global positioning systems; GPS; habitat management; Habitats; Hunting; Hypotheses; linear features; movement; Oil and gas exploration; Population decline; Population growth; Prey; Rangifer tarandus; recovery; Remote sensing; restoration; selection; Trophic levels; Vegetation; Wildlife conservation
• ISSN: 2150-8925; 2150-8925
• DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1936

Habitat restoration is a core element for the recovery of many declining species. In western Canada, habitat restoration for the recovery of woodland caribou is focused on linear features (LFs) created by oil and gas exploration. At present, the only established criterion for LF restoration is when vegetation structure on LFs is similar to surrounding vegetation. Human‐mediated habitat alteration impacts caribou population dynamics by increasing caribou predation rates in two ways: increasing alternate prey populations leading to higher predator numbers and increasing predator hunting efficiency. Linear features increase the movement rates—and may thus increase hunting efficiency—of wolves, a primary predator of caribou and a main hypothesized mechanism for population declines. One approach to determine LF recovery is to identify potential thresholds in the characteristics of regenerating LFs where efficiencies in wolf movement rates are no longer evident. We examined how vegetation affects wolf selection of, and movement on, LFs in northeastern Alberta using five‐minute Global Positioning System locations from 20 wolves. Wolves selected LFs with shorter vegetation and traveled faster on LFs with shorter, sparser vegetation and increased vegetation variability. Travel speeds were reduced by 1.5–1.7 km/h when vegetation exceeded heights of 0.50 m, but at least 30% of a LF required vegetation exceeding 4.1 m to slow movement rates to those traveled while in forest. Policy implications: Most of the movement efficiency afforded to wolves by LFs is mediated when vegetation exceeds 0.50 m, and therefore, active restoration could be focused in areas that have not met this value. Rather than treating this value as a clear threshold equating to functional recovery, multiple metrics across trophic levels must also be evaluated to assess population recovery for caribou.