Loading…

Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags

We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T-bar anchor tags or lock-on ta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine and coastal fisheries 2016-01, Vol.8 (1), p.374-381
Main Authors: Rutecki, Thomas L, Ianelli, J. N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3724-b798d424720a61c0ec1149e25052a6c6548bab760acfb562148b46ef282addb63
container_end_page 381
container_issue 1
container_start_page 374
container_title Marine and coastal fisheries
container_volume 8
creator Rutecki, Thomas L
Ianelli, J. N
description We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T-bar anchor tags or lock-on tags, which were anticipated to be used for tagging studies in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea. The tested handling procedures included transferring the tagged fish between live tanks either by using a dip net (dipnetted group) or with wet, bare hands (non-dipnetted group). Sixty percent of the dipnetted fish (63 of 105) died, whereas 12% of the non-dipnetted fish (17 of 138) died. Overall, 50% of the deaths occurred within 7 d after capture, and 89% of the deaths occurred within 10 d after capture. Of the dipnetted fish that died, 68% (n = 43) died from dermal infection due to scale loss, whereas 30% of the non-dipnetted fish mortalities were from dermal infection. Additionally, injuries that were recorded as potential mortality factors included fin loss, torn jaws, internal dysfunction, and unknown. All of the fish that received lock-on tags and 93% of the fish that were anchor-tagged developed an infection at the point of tag insertion. Tag retention rates were 99.5% for lock-on tags and 93.7% for anchor tags, and tag type did not affect survival. Use of hook-and-line capture is an effective method for reducing mechanical injury and mortality in Walleye Pollock. Recommended procedures for capturing and tagging Walleye Pollock include the use of hook and line and the use of wet, bare hands (or a similar low-abrasion approach) when handling the fish.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2289731614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2289731614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3724-b798d424720a61c0ec1149e25052a6c6548bab760acfb562148b46ef282addb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFPwyAUx4nRxDn9CCYknjuBUijxZJrNmczoYdMjgZZOtlpmaTP37S3pTDzuxIP3fv9HfgDcYjTBKEX3WFCSYIImBGE2wZhxLugZGIX3KDTO_9WX4Mr7DUKMChGPwPvMKG-1rWx7gK6ES7Ve23oNP1RVmYOBb66qXL6Fmdq1XWMKuLftJ5w7t4WqLuDC1gaufCCmP61palWFCH8NLkpVeXNzPMdgNZsus3m0eH16zh4XkY45oZHmIi0ooZwgxXCOTI4xFYYkKCGK5SyhqVaaM6TyUieM4P5OmSlJSlRRaBaPwd2Qu2vcd2d8KzeuC7_wkpBU8BgzTPupZJjKG-d9Y0q5a-yXag4SIxkUyj-FMiiUR4U99zBwe9vLOA2SL9mMoJgHOh5obZ2rzYk7fwEXNYHo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2289731614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Oxford University Press Open Access</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><creator>Rutecki, Thomas L ; Ianelli, J. N</creator><creatorcontrib>Rutecki, Thomas L ; Ianelli, J. N</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T-bar anchor tags or lock-on tags, which were anticipated to be used for tagging studies in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea. The tested handling procedures included transferring the tagged fish between live tanks either by using a dip net (dipnetted group) or with wet, bare hands (non-dipnetted group). Sixty percent of the dipnetted fish (63 of 105) died, whereas 12% of the non-dipnetted fish (17 of 138) died. Overall, 50% of the deaths occurred within 7 d after capture, and 89% of the deaths occurred within 10 d after capture. Of the dipnetted fish that died, 68% (n = 43) died from dermal infection due to scale loss, whereas 30% of the non-dipnetted fish mortalities were from dermal infection. Additionally, injuries that were recorded as potential mortality factors included fin loss, torn jaws, internal dysfunction, and unknown. All of the fish that received lock-on tags and 93% of the fish that were anchor-tagged developed an infection at the point of tag insertion. Tag retention rates were 99.5% for lock-on tags and 93.7% for anchor tags, and tag type did not affect survival. Use of hook-and-line capture is an effective method for reducing mechanical injury and mortality in Walleye Pollock. Recommended procedures for capturing and tagging Walleye Pollock include the use of hook and line and the use of wet, bare hands (or a similar low-abrasion approach) when handling the fish.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-5120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-5120</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: American Fisheries Society</publisher><subject>Abrasion ; Feasibility studies ; Fins ; Fish ; Fisheries ; Fishing ; Freshwater fishes ; Gadus chalcogrammus ; Handling ; Marine fishes ; Mortality ; Mortality factors ; Parameter estimation ; Procedures ; Research ships ; Skin ; Survival ; Tags ; Tanks ; Wounds</subject><ispartof>Marine and coastal fisheries, 2016-01, Vol.8 (1), p.374-381</ispartof><rights>This article not subject to U.S. copyright law. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.</rights><rights>This article not subject to U.S. copyright law.</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3724-b798d424720a61c0ec1149e25052a6c6548bab760acfb562148b46ef282addb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2289731614/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2289731614?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,46052,46476,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rutecki, Thomas L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ianelli, J. N</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags</title><title>Marine and coastal fisheries</title><description>We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T-bar anchor tags or lock-on tags, which were anticipated to be used for tagging studies in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea. The tested handling procedures included transferring the tagged fish between live tanks either by using a dip net (dipnetted group) or with wet, bare hands (non-dipnetted group). Sixty percent of the dipnetted fish (63 of 105) died, whereas 12% of the non-dipnetted fish (17 of 138) died. Overall, 50% of the deaths occurred within 7 d after capture, and 89% of the deaths occurred within 10 d after capture. Of the dipnetted fish that died, 68% (n = 43) died from dermal infection due to scale loss, whereas 30% of the non-dipnetted fish mortalities were from dermal infection. Additionally, injuries that were recorded as potential mortality factors included fin loss, torn jaws, internal dysfunction, and unknown. All of the fish that received lock-on tags and 93% of the fish that were anchor-tagged developed an infection at the point of tag insertion. Tag retention rates were 99.5% for lock-on tags and 93.7% for anchor tags, and tag type did not affect survival. Use of hook-and-line capture is an effective method for reducing mechanical injury and mortality in Walleye Pollock. Recommended procedures for capturing and tagging Walleye Pollock include the use of hook and line and the use of wet, bare hands (or a similar low-abrasion approach) when handling the fish.</description><subject>Abrasion</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Fins</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Gadus chalcogrammus</subject><subject>Handling</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mortality factors</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Procedures</subject><subject>Research ships</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tags</subject><subject>Tanks</subject><subject>Wounds</subject><issn>1942-5120</issn><issn>1942-5120</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFPwyAUx4nRxDn9CCYknjuBUijxZJrNmczoYdMjgZZOtlpmaTP37S3pTDzuxIP3fv9HfgDcYjTBKEX3WFCSYIImBGE2wZhxLugZGIX3KDTO_9WX4Mr7DUKMChGPwPvMKG-1rWx7gK6ES7Ve23oNP1RVmYOBb66qXL6Fmdq1XWMKuLftJ5w7t4WqLuDC1gaufCCmP61palWFCH8NLkpVeXNzPMdgNZsus3m0eH16zh4XkY45oZHmIi0ooZwgxXCOTI4xFYYkKCGK5SyhqVaaM6TyUieM4P5OmSlJSlRRaBaPwd2Qu2vcd2d8KzeuC7_wkpBU8BgzTPupZJjKG-d9Y0q5a-yXag4SIxkUyj-FMiiUR4U99zBwe9vLOA2SL9mMoJgHOh5obZ2rzYk7fwEXNYHo</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Rutecki, Thomas L</creator><creator>Ianelli, J. N</creator><general>American Fisheries Society</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags</title><author>Rutecki, Thomas L ; Ianelli, J. N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3724-b798d424720a61c0ec1149e25052a6c6548bab760acfb562148b46ef282addb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abrasion</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Fins</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Gadus chalcogrammus</topic><topic>Handling</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mortality factors</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Procedures</topic><topic>Research ships</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tags</topic><topic>Tanks</topic><topic>Wounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rutecki, Thomas L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ianelli, J. N</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Marine and coastal fisheries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rutecki, Thomas L</au><au>Ianelli, J. N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags</atitle><jtitle>Marine and coastal fisheries</jtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>381</epage><pages>374-381</pages><issn>1942-5120</issn><eissn>1942-5120</eissn><abstract>We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T-bar anchor tags or lock-on tags, which were anticipated to be used for tagging studies in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea. The tested handling procedures included transferring the tagged fish between live tanks either by using a dip net (dipnetted group) or with wet, bare hands (non-dipnetted group). Sixty percent of the dipnetted fish (63 of 105) died, whereas 12% of the non-dipnetted fish (17 of 138) died. Overall, 50% of the deaths occurred within 7 d after capture, and 89% of the deaths occurred within 10 d after capture. Of the dipnetted fish that died, 68% (n = 43) died from dermal infection due to scale loss, whereas 30% of the non-dipnetted fish mortalities were from dermal infection. Additionally, injuries that were recorded as potential mortality factors included fin loss, torn jaws, internal dysfunction, and unknown. All of the fish that received lock-on tags and 93% of the fish that were anchor-tagged developed an infection at the point of tag insertion. Tag retention rates were 99.5% for lock-on tags and 93.7% for anchor tags, and tag type did not affect survival. Use of hook-and-line capture is an effective method for reducing mechanical injury and mortality in Walleye Pollock. Recommended procedures for capturing and tagging Walleye Pollock include the use of hook and line and the use of wet, bare hands (or a similar low-abrasion approach) when handling the fish.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>American Fisheries Society</pub><doi>10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-5120
ispartof Marine and coastal fisheries, 2016-01, Vol.8 (1), p.374-381
issn 1942-5120
1942-5120
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2289731614
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; Oxford University Press Open Access; Wiley Open Access
subjects Abrasion
Feasibility studies
Fins
Fish
Fisheries
Fishing
Freshwater fishes
Gadus chalcogrammus
Handling
Marine fishes
Mortality
Mortality factors
Parameter estimation
Procedures
Research ships
Skin
Survival
Tags
Tanks
Wounds
title Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A19%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20Tagging%20Walleye%20Pollock%20Captured%20with%20Hook%20and%20Line%20Using%20External%20Tags&rft.jtitle=Marine%20and%20coastal%20fisheries&rft.au=Rutecki,%20Thomas%20L&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=381&rft.pages=374-381&rft.issn=1942-5120&rft.eissn=1942-5120&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2289731614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3724-b798d424720a61c0ec1149e25052a6c6548bab760acfb562148b46ef282addb63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2289731614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true