Loading…
Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags
We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T-bar anchor tags or lock-on ta...
Saved in:
Published in: | Marine and coastal fisheries 2016-01, Vol.8 (1), p.374-381 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3724-b798d424720a61c0ec1149e25052a6c6548bab760acfb562148b46ef282addb63 |
container_end_page | 381 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 374 |
container_title | Marine and coastal fisheries |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Rutecki, Thomas L Ianelli, J. N |
description | We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T-bar anchor tags or lock-on tags, which were anticipated to be used for tagging studies in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea. The tested handling procedures included transferring the tagged fish between live tanks either by using a dip net (dipnetted group) or with wet, bare hands (non-dipnetted group). Sixty percent of the dipnetted fish (63 of 105) died, whereas 12% of the non-dipnetted fish (17 of 138) died. Overall, 50% of the deaths occurred within 7 d after capture, and 89% of the deaths occurred within 10 d after capture. Of the dipnetted fish that died, 68% (n = 43) died from dermal infection due to scale loss, whereas 30% of the non-dipnetted fish mortalities were from dermal infection. Additionally, injuries that were recorded as potential mortality factors included fin loss, torn jaws, internal dysfunction, and unknown. All of the fish that received lock-on tags and 93% of the fish that were anchor-tagged developed an infection at the point of tag insertion. Tag retention rates were 99.5% for lock-on tags and 93.7% for anchor tags, and tag type did not affect survival. Use of hook-and-line capture is an effective method for reducing mechanical injury and mortality in Walleye Pollock. Recommended procedures for capturing and tagging Walleye Pollock include the use of hook and line and the use of wet, bare hands (or a similar low-abrasion approach) when handling the fish. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2289731614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2289731614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3724-b798d424720a61c0ec1149e25052a6c6548bab760acfb562148b46ef282addb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFPwyAUx4nRxDn9CCYknjuBUijxZJrNmczoYdMjgZZOtlpmaTP37S3pTDzuxIP3fv9HfgDcYjTBKEX3WFCSYIImBGE2wZhxLugZGIX3KDTO_9WX4Mr7DUKMChGPwPvMKG-1rWx7gK6ES7Ve23oNP1RVmYOBb66qXL6Fmdq1XWMKuLftJ5w7t4WqLuDC1gaufCCmP61palWFCH8NLkpVeXNzPMdgNZsus3m0eH16zh4XkY45oZHmIi0ooZwgxXCOTI4xFYYkKCGK5SyhqVaaM6TyUieM4P5OmSlJSlRRaBaPwd2Qu2vcd2d8KzeuC7_wkpBU8BgzTPupZJjKG-d9Y0q5a-yXag4SIxkUyj-FMiiUR4U99zBwe9vLOA2SL9mMoJgHOh5obZ2rzYk7fwEXNYHo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2289731614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Oxford University Press Open Access</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><creator>Rutecki, Thomas L ; Ianelli, J. N</creator><creatorcontrib>Rutecki, Thomas L ; Ianelli, J. N</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T-bar anchor tags or lock-on tags, which were anticipated to be used for tagging studies in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea. The tested handling procedures included transferring the tagged fish between live tanks either by using a dip net (dipnetted group) or with wet, bare hands (non-dipnetted group). Sixty percent of the dipnetted fish (63 of 105) died, whereas 12% of the non-dipnetted fish (17 of 138) died. Overall, 50% of the deaths occurred within 7 d after capture, and 89% of the deaths occurred within 10 d after capture. Of the dipnetted fish that died, 68% (n = 43) died from dermal infection due to scale loss, whereas 30% of the non-dipnetted fish mortalities were from dermal infection. Additionally, injuries that were recorded as potential mortality factors included fin loss, torn jaws, internal dysfunction, and unknown. All of the fish that received lock-on tags and 93% of the fish that were anchor-tagged developed an infection at the point of tag insertion. Tag retention rates were 99.5% for lock-on tags and 93.7% for anchor tags, and tag type did not affect survival. Use of hook-and-line capture is an effective method for reducing mechanical injury and mortality in Walleye Pollock. Recommended procedures for capturing and tagging Walleye Pollock include the use of hook and line and the use of wet, bare hands (or a similar low-abrasion approach) when handling the fish.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-5120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-5120</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: American Fisheries Society</publisher><subject>Abrasion ; Feasibility studies ; Fins ; Fish ; Fisheries ; Fishing ; Freshwater fishes ; Gadus chalcogrammus ; Handling ; Marine fishes ; Mortality ; Mortality factors ; Parameter estimation ; Procedures ; Research ships ; Skin ; Survival ; Tags ; Tanks ; Wounds</subject><ispartof>Marine and coastal fisheries, 2016-01, Vol.8 (1), p.374-381</ispartof><rights>This article not subject to U.S. copyright law. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.</rights><rights>This article not subject to U.S. copyright law.</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3724-b798d424720a61c0ec1149e25052a6c6548bab760acfb562148b46ef282addb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2289731614/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2289731614?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,46052,46476,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rutecki, Thomas L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ianelli, J. N</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags</title><title>Marine and coastal fisheries</title><description>We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T-bar anchor tags or lock-on tags, which were anticipated to be used for tagging studies in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea. The tested handling procedures included transferring the tagged fish between live tanks either by using a dip net (dipnetted group) or with wet, bare hands (non-dipnetted group). Sixty percent of the dipnetted fish (63 of 105) died, whereas 12% of the non-dipnetted fish (17 of 138) died. Overall, 50% of the deaths occurred within 7 d after capture, and 89% of the deaths occurred within 10 d after capture. Of the dipnetted fish that died, 68% (n = 43) died from dermal infection due to scale loss, whereas 30% of the non-dipnetted fish mortalities were from dermal infection. Additionally, injuries that were recorded as potential mortality factors included fin loss, torn jaws, internal dysfunction, and unknown. All of the fish that received lock-on tags and 93% of the fish that were anchor-tagged developed an infection at the point of tag insertion. Tag retention rates were 99.5% for lock-on tags and 93.7% for anchor tags, and tag type did not affect survival. Use of hook-and-line capture is an effective method for reducing mechanical injury and mortality in Walleye Pollock. Recommended procedures for capturing and tagging Walleye Pollock include the use of hook and line and the use of wet, bare hands (or a similar low-abrasion approach) when handling the fish.</description><subject>Abrasion</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Fins</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Gadus chalcogrammus</subject><subject>Handling</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mortality factors</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Procedures</subject><subject>Research ships</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tags</subject><subject>Tanks</subject><subject>Wounds</subject><issn>1942-5120</issn><issn>1942-5120</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFPwyAUx4nRxDn9CCYknjuBUijxZJrNmczoYdMjgZZOtlpmaTP37S3pTDzuxIP3fv9HfgDcYjTBKEX3WFCSYIImBGE2wZhxLugZGIX3KDTO_9WX4Mr7DUKMChGPwPvMKG-1rWx7gK6ES7Ve23oNP1RVmYOBb66qXL6Fmdq1XWMKuLftJ5w7t4WqLuDC1gaufCCmP61palWFCH8NLkpVeXNzPMdgNZsus3m0eH16zh4XkY45oZHmIi0ooZwgxXCOTI4xFYYkKCGK5SyhqVaaM6TyUieM4P5OmSlJSlRRaBaPwd2Qu2vcd2d8KzeuC7_wkpBU8BgzTPupZJjKG-d9Y0q5a-yXag4SIxkUyj-FMiiUR4U99zBwe9vLOA2SL9mMoJgHOh5obZ2rzYk7fwEXNYHo</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Rutecki, Thomas L</creator><creator>Ianelli, J. N</creator><general>American Fisheries Society</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags</title><author>Rutecki, Thomas L ; Ianelli, J. N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3724-b798d424720a61c0ec1149e25052a6c6548bab760acfb562148b46ef282addb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abrasion</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Fins</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Gadus chalcogrammus</topic><topic>Handling</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mortality factors</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Procedures</topic><topic>Research ships</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tags</topic><topic>Tanks</topic><topic>Wounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rutecki, Thomas L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ianelli, J. N</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Marine and coastal fisheries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rutecki, Thomas L</au><au>Ianelli, J. N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags</atitle><jtitle>Marine and coastal fisheries</jtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>381</epage><pages>374-381</pages><issn>1942-5120</issn><eissn>1942-5120</eissn><abstract>We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T-bar anchor tags or lock-on tags, which were anticipated to be used for tagging studies in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea. The tested handling procedures included transferring the tagged fish between live tanks either by using a dip net (dipnetted group) or with wet, bare hands (non-dipnetted group). Sixty percent of the dipnetted fish (63 of 105) died, whereas 12% of the non-dipnetted fish (17 of 138) died. Overall, 50% of the deaths occurred within 7 d after capture, and 89% of the deaths occurred within 10 d after capture. Of the dipnetted fish that died, 68% (n = 43) died from dermal infection due to scale loss, whereas 30% of the non-dipnetted fish mortalities were from dermal infection. Additionally, injuries that were recorded as potential mortality factors included fin loss, torn jaws, internal dysfunction, and unknown. All of the fish that received lock-on tags and 93% of the fish that were anchor-tagged developed an infection at the point of tag insertion. Tag retention rates were 99.5% for lock-on tags and 93.7% for anchor tags, and tag type did not affect survival. Use of hook-and-line capture is an effective method for reducing mechanical injury and mortality in Walleye Pollock. Recommended procedures for capturing and tagging Walleye Pollock include the use of hook and line and the use of wet, bare hands (or a similar low-abrasion approach) when handling the fish.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>American Fisheries Society</pub><doi>10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1942-5120 |
ispartof | Marine and coastal fisheries, 2016-01, Vol.8 (1), p.374-381 |
issn | 1942-5120 1942-5120 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2289731614 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; Oxford University Press Open Access; Wiley Open Access |
subjects | Abrasion Feasibility studies Fins Fish Fisheries Fishing Freshwater fishes Gadus chalcogrammus Handling Marine fishes Mortality Mortality factors Parameter estimation Procedures Research ships Skin Survival Tags Tanks Wounds |
title | Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line Using External Tags |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A19%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20Tagging%20Walleye%20Pollock%20Captured%20with%20Hook%20and%20Line%20Using%20External%20Tags&rft.jtitle=Marine%20and%20coastal%20fisheries&rft.au=Rutecki,%20Thomas%20L&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=381&rft.pages=374-381&rft.issn=1942-5120&rft.eissn=1942-5120&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2289731614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3724-b798d424720a61c0ec1149e25052a6c6548bab760acfb562148b46ef282addb63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2289731614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |