In response to 'Six critical questions about smart spezialisation'

This paper has been written as a response to « Six critical questions about smart specialization » by R. Hassink and H. Gong. The paper starts with a reminder of what has not changed in terms of the basic principles and raison d'être of smart specialization. Then it proceeds to identifying what...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European planning studies 2019-10, Vol.27 (10), p.2066-2078
Main Author: Foray, Dominique
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
entrepreneurial discovery
Questions
regional innovation policy
Smart specialization
Specialization
structural changes
transformative activity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper has been written as a response to « Six critical questions about smart specialization » by R. Hassink and H. Gong. The paper starts with a reminder of what has not changed in terms of the basic principles and raison d'être of smart specialization. Then it proceeds to identifying what we have learned since 2014 and on this basis it will address the six critical questions posed by Robert and Huiven.
ISSN:0965-4313
1469-5944
DOI:10.1080/09654313.2019.1664037