Loading…

Measuring Socioeconomic Position From The Social Inequalities In Health Perspective?: The Case of Costa Rica

Introduction: Measuring socioeconomic position (SEP) is central in the analysis of social inequalities in health (SIH). It requires the use of updated instruments, adapted to a particular conceptual framework, taking into account the local context and the population characteristics. This study aims...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Odovtos 2019-09, Vol.21 (3), p.143-153
Main Authors: Fantin MSc, Romain, Gómez-Duarte MD, MSc, PhD, Ingrid, Sáenz-Bonilla MSc, Juan Pablo, Rojas-Araya NP, Karol, Barboza-Solís DDS, MSc, PhD, Cristina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-c23ced306d6f936b673cc6f7a96a368776fc667a8e6fcdff1044018c6d4fefac3
cites
container_end_page 153
container_issue 3
container_start_page 143
container_title Odovtos
container_volume 21
creator Fantin MSc, Romain
Gómez-Duarte MD, MSc, PhD, Ingrid
Sáenz-Bonilla MSc, Juan Pablo
Rojas-Araya NP, Karol
Barboza-Solís DDS, MSc, PhD, Cristina
description Introduction: Measuring socioeconomic position (SEP) is central in the analysis of social inequalities in health (SIH). It requires the use of updated instruments, adapted to a particular conceptual framework, taking into account the local context and the population characteristics. This study aims to present and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different measurement of SEP used in Costa Rica for the analysis of health inequalities.  Materials and methods: A systematic review of the existing instruments and methods used to characterize SEP in Costa Rica was carried out. Results: There is a great diversity of instruments used as proxies of SEP in Costa Rica, both at the individual, and at geographical level. These measures allow to capture specific dimensions of SEP potentially associated with different health outcomes. Being a latent concept, variables approaching SEP should refer to their specific conceptual framework, be adapted to the study design, and population’s characteristics (e.g. age), and should consider the study feasibility of data collection.  Due to the variety and different conceptual frameworks behind each SEP variable, it is not possible to establish the existence of a gold standard. Conclusion: This review of the Costa Rican health inequalities literature regarding SEP instruments, can contribute to a better use of the existing tools. It will allow researchers to better evaluate the instruments that have been previously validated, their respective theoretical frameworks and limitations, to choose the most suitable proxy of SEP for the local context analyzed.
doi_str_mv 10.15517/ijds.2019.37295
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2290075713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290075713</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-c23ced306d6f936b673cc6f7a96a368776fc667a8e6fcdff1044018c6d4fefac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkN1LwzAUxYMoOObefQz43JmPNml9ESnODSYOnc8hpjcuo2u2pBP87806X-4H53Av54fQLSVTWhRU3rttE6eM0GrKJauKCzRijBYZzym9RCMqiiqjJBfXaBLjlpBkZCXL8xFqX0HHY3DdN_7wxnkwvvM7Z_DKR9c73-FZ8Du83sCg6xYvOjgcdZtEiGnBc9Btv8ErCHEPpnc_8Pgw-GsdAXuLax97jd-d0Tfoyuo2wuS_j9Hn7Hldz7Pl28uiflpmJkXoU-UGGk5EI2zFxZeQ3Bhhpa6E5qKUUlgjhNQlpKGxNiXLCS2NaHILVhs-Rnfnu_vgD0eIvdr6Y-jSS8VYRYgsJOXJRc4uE3yMAazaB7fT4VdRogas6oRVnbCqASv_A6nRa_E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290075713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Socioeconomic Position From The Social Inequalities In Health Perspective?: The Case of Costa Rica</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><creator>Fantin MSc, Romain ; Gómez-Duarte MD, MSc, PhD, Ingrid ; Sáenz-Bonilla MSc, Juan Pablo ; Rojas-Araya NP, Karol ; Barboza-Solís DDS, MSc, PhD, Cristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Fantin MSc, Romain ; Gómez-Duarte MD, MSc, PhD, Ingrid ; Sáenz-Bonilla MSc, Juan Pablo ; Rojas-Araya NP, Karol ; Barboza-Solís DDS, MSc, PhD, Cristina</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Measuring socioeconomic position (SEP) is central in the analysis of social inequalities in health (SIH). It requires the use of updated instruments, adapted to a particular conceptual framework, taking into account the local context and the population characteristics. This study aims to present and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different measurement of SEP used in Costa Rica for the analysis of health inequalities.  Materials and methods: A systematic review of the existing instruments and methods used to characterize SEP in Costa Rica was carried out. Results: There is a great diversity of instruments used as proxies of SEP in Costa Rica, both at the individual, and at geographical level. These measures allow to capture specific dimensions of SEP potentially associated with different health outcomes. Being a latent concept, variables approaching SEP should refer to their specific conceptual framework, be adapted to the study design, and population’s characteristics (e.g. age), and should consider the study feasibility of data collection.  Due to the variety and different conceptual frameworks behind each SEP variable, it is not possible to establish the existence of a gold standard. Conclusion: This review of the Costa Rican health inequalities literature regarding SEP instruments, can contribute to a better use of the existing tools. It will allow researchers to better evaluate the instruments that have been previously validated, their respective theoretical frameworks and limitations, to choose the most suitable proxy of SEP for the local context analyzed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1659-1046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2215-3411</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15517/ijds.2019.37295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Jose: Universidad de Costa Rica, Facultad de Odontologia</publisher><subject>Income inequality ; Mortality ; Relative deprivation ; Socioeconomic factors</subject><ispartof>Odovtos, 2019-09, Vol.21 (3), p.143-153</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-c23ced306d6f936b673cc6f7a96a368776fc667a8e6fcdff1044018c6d4fefac3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290075713/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290075713?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fantin MSc, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Duarte MD, MSc, PhD, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sáenz-Bonilla MSc, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojas-Araya NP, Karol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barboza-Solís DDS, MSc, PhD, Cristina</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Socioeconomic Position From The Social Inequalities In Health Perspective?: The Case of Costa Rica</title><title>Odovtos</title><description>Introduction: Measuring socioeconomic position (SEP) is central in the analysis of social inequalities in health (SIH). It requires the use of updated instruments, adapted to a particular conceptual framework, taking into account the local context and the population characteristics. This study aims to present and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different measurement of SEP used in Costa Rica for the analysis of health inequalities.  Materials and methods: A systematic review of the existing instruments and methods used to characterize SEP in Costa Rica was carried out. Results: There is a great diversity of instruments used as proxies of SEP in Costa Rica, both at the individual, and at geographical level. These measures allow to capture specific dimensions of SEP potentially associated with different health outcomes. Being a latent concept, variables approaching SEP should refer to their specific conceptual framework, be adapted to the study design, and population’s characteristics (e.g. age), and should consider the study feasibility of data collection.  Due to the variety and different conceptual frameworks behind each SEP variable, it is not possible to establish the existence of a gold standard. Conclusion: This review of the Costa Rican health inequalities literature regarding SEP instruments, can contribute to a better use of the existing tools. It will allow researchers to better evaluate the instruments that have been previously validated, their respective theoretical frameworks and limitations, to choose the most suitable proxy of SEP for the local context analyzed.</description><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Relative deprivation</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><issn>1659-1046</issn><issn>2215-3411</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotkN1LwzAUxYMoOObefQz43JmPNml9ESnODSYOnc8hpjcuo2u2pBP87806X-4H53Av54fQLSVTWhRU3rttE6eM0GrKJauKCzRijBYZzym9RCMqiiqjJBfXaBLjlpBkZCXL8xFqX0HHY3DdN_7wxnkwvvM7Z_DKR9c73-FZ8Du83sCg6xYvOjgcdZtEiGnBc9Btv8ErCHEPpnc_8Pgw-GsdAXuLax97jd-d0Tfoyuo2wuS_j9Hn7Hldz7Pl28uiflpmJkXoU-UGGk5EI2zFxZeQ3Bhhpa6E5qKUUlgjhNQlpKGxNiXLCS2NaHILVhs-Rnfnu_vgD0eIvdr6Y-jSS8VYRYgsJOXJRc4uE3yMAazaB7fT4VdRogas6oRVnbCqASv_A6nRa_E</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Fantin MSc, Romain</creator><creator>Gómez-Duarte MD, MSc, PhD, Ingrid</creator><creator>Sáenz-Bonilla MSc, Juan Pablo</creator><creator>Rojas-Araya NP, Karol</creator><creator>Barboza-Solís DDS, MSc, PhD, Cristina</creator><general>Universidad de Costa Rica, Facultad de Odontologia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Measuring Socioeconomic Position From The Social Inequalities In Health Perspective?: The Case of Costa Rica</title><author>Fantin MSc, Romain ; Gómez-Duarte MD, MSc, PhD, Ingrid ; Sáenz-Bonilla MSc, Juan Pablo ; Rojas-Araya NP, Karol ; Barboza-Solís DDS, MSc, PhD, Cristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-c23ced306d6f936b673cc6f7a96a368776fc667a8e6fcdff1044018c6d4fefac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Relative deprivation</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fantin MSc, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Duarte MD, MSc, PhD, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sáenz-Bonilla MSc, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojas-Araya NP, Karol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barboza-Solís DDS, MSc, PhD, Cristina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Odovtos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fantin MSc, Romain</au><au>Gómez-Duarte MD, MSc, PhD, Ingrid</au><au>Sáenz-Bonilla MSc, Juan Pablo</au><au>Rojas-Araya NP, Karol</au><au>Barboza-Solís DDS, MSc, PhD, Cristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Socioeconomic Position From The Social Inequalities In Health Perspective?: The Case of Costa Rica</atitle><jtitle>Odovtos</jtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>143-153</pages><issn>1659-1046</issn><eissn>2215-3411</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Measuring socioeconomic position (SEP) is central in the analysis of social inequalities in health (SIH). It requires the use of updated instruments, adapted to a particular conceptual framework, taking into account the local context and the population characteristics. This study aims to present and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different measurement of SEP used in Costa Rica for the analysis of health inequalities.  Materials and methods: A systematic review of the existing instruments and methods used to characterize SEP in Costa Rica was carried out. Results: There is a great diversity of instruments used as proxies of SEP in Costa Rica, both at the individual, and at geographical level. These measures allow to capture specific dimensions of SEP potentially associated with different health outcomes. Being a latent concept, variables approaching SEP should refer to their specific conceptual framework, be adapted to the study design, and population’s characteristics (e.g. age), and should consider the study feasibility of data collection.  Due to the variety and different conceptual frameworks behind each SEP variable, it is not possible to establish the existence of a gold standard. Conclusion: This review of the Costa Rican health inequalities literature regarding SEP instruments, can contribute to a better use of the existing tools. It will allow researchers to better evaluate the instruments that have been previously validated, their respective theoretical frameworks and limitations, to choose the most suitable proxy of SEP for the local context analyzed.</abstract><cop>San Jose</cop><pub>Universidad de Costa Rica, Facultad de Odontologia</pub><doi>10.15517/ijds.2019.37295</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1659-1046
ispartof Odovtos, 2019-09, Vol.21 (3), p.143-153
issn 1659-1046
2215-3411
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2290075713
source Access via ProQuest (Open Access)
subjects Income inequality
Mortality
Relative deprivation
Socioeconomic factors
title Measuring Socioeconomic Position From The Social Inequalities In Health Perspective?: The Case of Costa Rica
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A50%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Socioeconomic%20Position%20From%20The%20Social%20Inequalities%20In%20Health%20Perspective?:%20The%20Case%20of%20Costa%20Rica&rft.jtitle=Odovtos&rft.au=Fantin%20MSc,%20Romain&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=143-153&rft.issn=1659-1046&rft.eissn=2215-3411&rft_id=info:doi/10.15517/ijds.2019.37295&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2290075713%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-c23ced306d6f936b673cc6f7a96a368776fc667a8e6fcdff1044018c6d4fefac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290075713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true