Verbs, Times and Objects

The aim of the paper is to demonstrate the fruitfulness of the influential verb typology developed by Zeno Vendler for recent debates in the philosophy of perception. Section one explains the verb typology and explains how Vendler applies it to different perceptual notions. Section two identifies va...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of philosophical studies : IJPS 2019-08, Vol.27 (4), p.475-497
Main Author: Crowther, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
endurance
Language typology
Matching
perception
Perceptions
Predicate
processes
Questions
Subjectivity
temporal properties
Time
Typological analysis
Vendler
verb aspect
Verbs
Visual perception
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of the paper is to demonstrate the fruitfulness of the influential verb typology developed by Zeno Vendler for recent debates in the philosophy of perception. Section one explains the verb typology and explains how Vendler applies it to different perceptual notions. Section two identifies various questions that arise from observations in Vendler's paper that suggest that there is a match between the temporal properties of perceptual verb objects and the complex verb phrases of which they are a part. Subsequent discussion focuses on just one of these questions. Section three identifies and rejects a simple proposal about how to answer this question. Section four develops a 'limited matching' account. In the visual perception of events and processes there seems to be a match between the temporal duration, order and location of the events and processes which are the objects of perception and the subject's perceiving them. But this matching is absent in cases of the perception of primary substances; objects which manifestly endure over time. Section five identifies and responds to some criticisms of this matching account. The conclusion notes some consequences of the discussion for contemporary debates about the temporal characteristics of perception.
ISSN:0967-2559
1466-4542
DOI:10.1080/09672559.2019.1598102