Loading…
Subaltern Studies
The historiographical intervention of the Indian Subaltern Studies Group took as their targets elite and nationalist accounts of the transition from colonialism to nationhood. However, they also included in their interventions a corresponding critique of Marxist analyses of the transition to nationa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000) Netherland : 2000), 2018-01 (2) |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000) |
container_volume | |
creator | Dasgupta, Sudeep |
description | The historiographical intervention of the Indian Subaltern Studies Group took as their targets elite and nationalist accounts of the transition from colonialism to nationhood. However, they also included in their interventions a corresponding critique of Marxist analyses of the transition to nationalism. As Gyan Prakash argues “When Marxists turned the spotlight on colonial exploitation, their criticism was framed by a historicist scheme that universalized Europe’s historical experience” (Prakash 1994, 1375).Subaltern Studiesthus also found a place within the field of Postcolonial Studies’ critique of Europe-centred analyses of history, politics and identity. The critique of Marxism targeted the Marxist reliance on “mode-of-production narratives” couched in terms of a “nation-state’s ideology of modernity and progress” which resulted in an inability to take seriously “the oppressed’s ‘lived experience’ of religion and social customs” (ibid., 1477). |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2291069665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2291069665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-47b3168e1cbc94fb66cf8ed970934cf218c574305a10924f363b153b4620a61d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzb0KwjAUQOEgCGp18A0E50JubnKTjFL8g4KD7tKkCSil1aZ9fwWdzvadCZuD0SrXwHHGFik9OZdKWZiz9XV0VTOEvt1ch7F-hLRk01g1Kaz-zdjtsL8Vp7y8HM_Frsxf1gy51A6BTADvvJXREfloQm01tyh9FGC80hK5qoBbISMSOlDoJAleEdSYse2PffXdewxpuD-7sW-_x7sQFjhZIoUfc1gx7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2291069665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subaltern Studies</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Dasgupta, Sudeep</creator><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Sudeep</creatorcontrib><description>The historiographical intervention of the Indian Subaltern Studies Group took as their targets elite and nationalist accounts of the transition from colonialism to nationhood. However, they also included in their interventions a corresponding critique of Marxist analyses of the transition to nationalism. As Gyan Prakash argues “When Marxists turned the spotlight on colonial exploitation, their criticism was framed by a historicist scheme that universalized Europe’s historical experience” (Prakash 1994, 1375).Subaltern Studiesthus also found a place within the field of Postcolonial Studies’ critique of Europe-centred analyses of history, politics and identity. The critique of Marxism targeted the Marxist reliance on “mode-of-production narratives” couched in terms of a “nation-state’s ideology of modernity and progress” which resulted in an inability to take seriously “the oppressed’s ‘lived experience’ of religion and social customs” (ibid., 1477).</description><identifier>EISSN: 1875-7103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Krisis</publisher><subject>Asian history ; Capitalism ; Colonialism ; Criticism ; Exploitation ; Globalization ; Gramsci, Antonio (1891-1937) ; Hegemony ; Historiography ; Identity politics ; Intervention ; Marxism ; Modernity ; Narratives ; Nation states ; Nationalism ; Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey ; Politics ; Postcolonialism ; Power ; Religion ; Religion & politics ; Society ; Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty ; Subaltern identities</subject><ispartof>Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000), 2018-01 (2)</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/nl/deed.en (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2291069665/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2291069665?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,21367,21374,25732,33590,33964,36991,43712,43927,44569,73968,74215,74873</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Sudeep</creatorcontrib><title>Subaltern Studies</title><title>Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000)</title><description>The historiographical intervention of the Indian Subaltern Studies Group took as their targets elite and nationalist accounts of the transition from colonialism to nationhood. However, they also included in their interventions a corresponding critique of Marxist analyses of the transition to nationalism. As Gyan Prakash argues “When Marxists turned the spotlight on colonial exploitation, their criticism was framed by a historicist scheme that universalized Europe’s historical experience” (Prakash 1994, 1375).Subaltern Studiesthus also found a place within the field of Postcolonial Studies’ critique of Europe-centred analyses of history, politics and identity. The critique of Marxism targeted the Marxist reliance on “mode-of-production narratives” couched in terms of a “nation-state’s ideology of modernity and progress” which resulted in an inability to take seriously “the oppressed’s ‘lived experience’ of religion and social customs” (ibid., 1477).</description><subject>Asian history</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Gramsci, Antonio (1891-1937)</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Historiography</subject><subject>Identity politics</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Marxism</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Nation states</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Postcolonialism</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion & politics</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty</subject><subject>Subaltern identities</subject><issn>1875-7103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotzb0KwjAUQOEgCGp18A0E50JubnKTjFL8g4KD7tKkCSil1aZ9fwWdzvadCZuD0SrXwHHGFik9OZdKWZiz9XV0VTOEvt1ch7F-hLRk01g1Kaz-zdjtsL8Vp7y8HM_Frsxf1gy51A6BTADvvJXREfloQm01tyh9FGC80hK5qoBbISMSOlDoJAleEdSYse2PffXdewxpuD-7sW-_x7sQFjhZIoUfc1gx7g</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Dasgupta, Sudeep</creator><general>Krisis</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Subaltern Studies</title><author>Dasgupta, Sudeep</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-47b3168e1cbc94fb66cf8ed970934cf218c574305a10924f363b153b4620a61d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Asian history</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Gramsci, Antonio (1891-1937)</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Historiography</topic><topic>Identity politics</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Marxism</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Nation states</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Postcolonialism</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion & politics</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty</topic><topic>Subaltern identities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Sudeep</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dasgupta, Sudeep</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subaltern Studies</atitle><jtitle>Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000)</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><issue>2</issue><eissn>1875-7103</eissn><abstract>The historiographical intervention of the Indian Subaltern Studies Group took as their targets elite and nationalist accounts of the transition from colonialism to nationhood. However, they also included in their interventions a corresponding critique of Marxist analyses of the transition to nationalism. As Gyan Prakash argues “When Marxists turned the spotlight on colonial exploitation, their criticism was framed by a historicist scheme that universalized Europe’s historical experience” (Prakash 1994, 1375).Subaltern Studiesthus also found a place within the field of Postcolonial Studies’ critique of Europe-centred analyses of history, politics and identity. The critique of Marxism targeted the Marxist reliance on “mode-of-production narratives” couched in terms of a “nation-state’s ideology of modernity and progress” which resulted in an inability to take seriously “the oppressed’s ‘lived experience’ of religion and social customs” (ibid., 1477).</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Krisis</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1875-7103 |
ispartof | Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000), 2018-01 (2) |
issn | 1875-7103 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2291069665 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Politics Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Asian history Capitalism Colonialism Criticism Exploitation Globalization Gramsci, Antonio (1891-1937) Hegemony Historiography Identity politics Intervention Marxism Modernity Narratives Nation states Nationalism Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey Politics Postcolonialism Power Religion Religion & politics Society Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty Subaltern identities |
title | Subaltern Studies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A14%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subaltern%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Krisis%20(Amsterdam,%20Netherland%20:%202000)&rft.au=Dasgupta,%20Sudeep&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.issue=2&rft.eissn=1875-7103&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2291069665%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-47b3168e1cbc94fb66cf8ed970934cf218c574305a10924f363b153b4620a61d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2291069665&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |