Loading…

Subaltern Studies

The historiographical intervention of the Indian Subaltern Studies Group took as their targets elite and nationalist accounts of the transition from colonialism to nationhood. However, they also included in their interventions a corresponding critique of Marxist analyses of the transition to nationa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000) Netherland : 2000), 2018-01 (2)
Main Author: Dasgupta, Sudeep
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000)
container_volume
creator Dasgupta, Sudeep
description The historiographical intervention of the Indian Subaltern Studies Group took as their targets elite and nationalist accounts of the transition from colonialism to nationhood. However, they also included in their interventions a corresponding critique of Marxist analyses of the transition to nationalism. As Gyan Prakash argues “When Marxists turned the spotlight on colonial exploitation, their criticism was framed by a historicist scheme that universalized Europe’s historical experience” (Prakash 1994, 1375).Subaltern Studiesthus also found a place within the field of Postcolonial Studies’ critique of Europe-centred analyses of history, politics and identity. The critique of Marxism targeted the Marxist reliance on “mode-of-production narratives” couched in terms of a “nation-state’s ideology of modernity and progress” which resulted in an inability to take seriously “the oppressed’s ‘lived experience’ of religion and social customs” (ibid., 1477).
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2291069665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2291069665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-47b3168e1cbc94fb66cf8ed970934cf218c574305a10924f363b153b4620a61d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzb0KwjAUQOEgCGp18A0E50JubnKTjFL8g4KD7tKkCSil1aZ9fwWdzvadCZuD0SrXwHHGFik9OZdKWZiz9XV0VTOEvt1ch7F-hLRk01g1Kaz-zdjtsL8Vp7y8HM_Frsxf1gy51A6BTADvvJXREfloQm01tyh9FGC80hK5qoBbISMSOlDoJAleEdSYse2PffXdewxpuD-7sW-_x7sQFjhZIoUfc1gx7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2291069665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subaltern Studies</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Dasgupta, Sudeep</creator><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Sudeep</creatorcontrib><description>The historiographical intervention of the Indian Subaltern Studies Group took as their targets elite and nationalist accounts of the transition from colonialism to nationhood. However, they also included in their interventions a corresponding critique of Marxist analyses of the transition to nationalism. As Gyan Prakash argues “When Marxists turned the spotlight on colonial exploitation, their criticism was framed by a historicist scheme that universalized Europe’s historical experience” (Prakash 1994, 1375).Subaltern Studiesthus also found a place within the field of Postcolonial Studies’ critique of Europe-centred analyses of history, politics and identity. The critique of Marxism targeted the Marxist reliance on “mode-of-production narratives” couched in terms of a “nation-state’s ideology of modernity and progress” which resulted in an inability to take seriously “the oppressed’s ‘lived experience’ of religion and social customs” (ibid., 1477).</description><identifier>EISSN: 1875-7103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Krisis</publisher><subject>Asian history ; Capitalism ; Colonialism ; Criticism ; Exploitation ; Globalization ; Gramsci, Antonio (1891-1937) ; Hegemony ; Historiography ; Identity politics ; Intervention ; Marxism ; Modernity ; Narratives ; Nation states ; Nationalism ; Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey ; Politics ; Postcolonialism ; Power ; Religion ; Religion &amp; politics ; Society ; Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty ; Subaltern identities</subject><ispartof>Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000), 2018-01 (2)</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/nl/deed.en (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2291069665/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2291069665?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,21367,21374,25732,33590,33964,36991,43712,43927,44569,73968,74215,74873</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Sudeep</creatorcontrib><title>Subaltern Studies</title><title>Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000)</title><description>The historiographical intervention of the Indian Subaltern Studies Group took as their targets elite and nationalist accounts of the transition from colonialism to nationhood. However, they also included in their interventions a corresponding critique of Marxist analyses of the transition to nationalism. As Gyan Prakash argues “When Marxists turned the spotlight on colonial exploitation, their criticism was framed by a historicist scheme that universalized Europe’s historical experience” (Prakash 1994, 1375).Subaltern Studiesthus also found a place within the field of Postcolonial Studies’ critique of Europe-centred analyses of history, politics and identity. The critique of Marxism targeted the Marxist reliance on “mode-of-production narratives” couched in terms of a “nation-state’s ideology of modernity and progress” which resulted in an inability to take seriously “the oppressed’s ‘lived experience’ of religion and social customs” (ibid., 1477).</description><subject>Asian history</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Gramsci, Antonio (1891-1937)</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Historiography</subject><subject>Identity politics</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Marxism</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Nation states</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Postcolonialism</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion &amp; politics</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty</subject><subject>Subaltern identities</subject><issn>1875-7103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotzb0KwjAUQOEgCGp18A0E50JubnKTjFL8g4KD7tKkCSil1aZ9fwWdzvadCZuD0SrXwHHGFik9OZdKWZiz9XV0VTOEvt1ch7F-hLRk01g1Kaz-zdjtsL8Vp7y8HM_Frsxf1gy51A6BTADvvJXREfloQm01tyh9FGC80hK5qoBbISMSOlDoJAleEdSYse2PffXdewxpuD-7sW-_x7sQFjhZIoUfc1gx7g</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Dasgupta, Sudeep</creator><general>Krisis</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Subaltern Studies</title><author>Dasgupta, Sudeep</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-47b3168e1cbc94fb66cf8ed970934cf218c574305a10924f363b153b4620a61d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Asian history</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Gramsci, Antonio (1891-1937)</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Historiography</topic><topic>Identity politics</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Marxism</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Nation states</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Postcolonialism</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion &amp; politics</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty</topic><topic>Subaltern identities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Sudeep</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dasgupta, Sudeep</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subaltern Studies</atitle><jtitle>Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000)</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><issue>2</issue><eissn>1875-7103</eissn><abstract>The historiographical intervention of the Indian Subaltern Studies Group took as their targets elite and nationalist accounts of the transition from colonialism to nationhood. However, they also included in their interventions a corresponding critique of Marxist analyses of the transition to nationalism. As Gyan Prakash argues “When Marxists turned the spotlight on colonial exploitation, their criticism was framed by a historicist scheme that universalized Europe’s historical experience” (Prakash 1994, 1375).Subaltern Studiesthus also found a place within the field of Postcolonial Studies’ critique of Europe-centred analyses of history, politics and identity. The critique of Marxism targeted the Marxist reliance on “mode-of-production narratives” couched in terms of a “nation-state’s ideology of modernity and progress” which resulted in an inability to take seriously “the oppressed’s ‘lived experience’ of religion and social customs” (ibid., 1477).</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Krisis</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1875-7103
ispartof Krisis (Amsterdam, Netherland : 2000), 2018-01 (2)
issn 1875-7103
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2291069665
source Publicly Available Content Database; Politics Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Asian history
Capitalism
Colonialism
Criticism
Exploitation
Globalization
Gramsci, Antonio (1891-1937)
Hegemony
Historiography
Identity politics
Intervention
Marxism
Modernity
Narratives
Nation states
Nationalism
Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey
Politics
Postcolonialism
Power
Religion
Religion & politics
Society
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty
Subaltern identities
title Subaltern Studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A14%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subaltern%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Krisis%20(Amsterdam,%20Netherland%20:%202000)&rft.au=Dasgupta,%20Sudeep&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.issue=2&rft.eissn=1875-7103&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2291069665%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-47b3168e1cbc94fb66cf8ed970934cf218c574305a10924f363b153b4620a61d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2291069665&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true