Myth and Reality in Wakefield’s Assertions Regarding Paul and Lentz (1977)

Wakefield's overall critique is typified by a lack of theoretical understanding of his presumed theoretical enemy and its evidence base, selective perception to a degree suggesting harmful dysfunction, out-of-context quotes, and arguments based on factually incorrect allegations-clearly so in h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavior and social issues 2006-10, Vol.15 (2), p.244-252
Main Author: Paul, Gordon L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavior
Environmental economics
Medical treatment
Mental institutions
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-d96b208cefdbd09478090aca8f004ae1f21dc62c6e106796a930b8266e0f99b43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-d96b208cefdbd09478090aca8f004ae1f21dc62c6e106796a930b8266e0f99b43
container_end_page 252
container_issue 2
container_start_page 244
container_title Behavior and social issues
container_volume 15
creator Paul, Gordon L.
description Wakefield's overall critique is typified by a lack of theoretical understanding of his presumed theoretical enemy and its evidence base, selective perception to a degree suggesting harmful dysfunction, out-of-context quotes, and arguments based on factually incorrect allegations-clearly so in his assertions regarding the procedures and evidence in the Paul and Lentz (1977) monograph.
doi_str_mv 10.5210/bsi.v15i2.391
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_229343900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1193571271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-d96b208cefdbd09478090aca8f004ae1f21dc62c6e106796a930b8266e0f99b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkL1OwzAUhS0EEqEwsltMMKRc24kdj1XFnxQEQiBGy4nt4hKSYidIZeI1eD2ehNAy3eW75xx9CB0TmOaUwHkV_fSD5J5OmSQ7KKFM8JSLgu-ihADPUpkD30cHMS4BgAtGElTervsXrFuDH6xufL_GvsXP-tU6bxvz8_Ud8SxGG3rftXFkFjoY3y7wvR6azVtp2_4TnxIpxNkh2nO6ifbo_07Q0-XF4_w6Le-ubuazMq0pY31qJK8oFLV1pjIgM1GABF3rwgFk2hJHiak5rbkdVwvJtWRQFZRzC07KKmMTdLLNXYXufbCxV8tuCO1YqSiVLGMSYITSLVSHLsZgnVoF_6bDWhFQf77U6EttfKnRF_sF_Etd3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229343900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Myth and Reality in Wakefield’s Assertions Regarding Paul and Lentz (1977)</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Paul, Gordon L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paul, Gordon L.</creatorcontrib><description>Wakefield's overall critique is typified by a lack of theoretical understanding of his presumed theoretical enemy and its evidence base, selective perception to a degree suggesting harmful dysfunction, out-of-context quotes, and arguments based on factually incorrect allegations-clearly so in his assertions regarding the procedures and evidence in the Paul and Lentz (1977) monograph.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-9506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-6786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5210/bsi.v15i2.391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Environmental economics ; Medical treatment ; Mental institutions</subject><ispartof>Behavior and social issues, 2006-10, Vol.15 (2), p.244-252</ispartof><rights>Copyright Behaviorists for Social Responsibility Fall 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-d96b208cefdbd09478090aca8f004ae1f21dc62c6e106796a930b8266e0f99b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-d96b208cefdbd09478090aca8f004ae1f21dc62c6e106796a930b8266e0f99b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/229343900/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/229343900?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21373,27321,27901,27902,33588,33751,43709,74192</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paul, Gordon L.</creatorcontrib><title>Myth and Reality in Wakefield’s Assertions Regarding Paul and Lentz (1977)</title><title>Behavior and social issues</title><description>Wakefield's overall critique is typified by a lack of theoretical understanding of his presumed theoretical enemy and its evidence base, selective perception to a degree suggesting harmful dysfunction, out-of-context quotes, and arguments based on factually incorrect allegations-clearly so in his assertions regarding the procedures and evidence in the Paul and Lentz (1977) monograph.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Mental institutions</subject><issn>1064-9506</issn><issn>2376-6786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNotkL1OwzAUhS0EEqEwsltMMKRc24kdj1XFnxQEQiBGy4nt4hKSYidIZeI1eD2ehNAy3eW75xx9CB0TmOaUwHkV_fSD5J5OmSQ7KKFM8JSLgu-ihADPUpkD30cHMS4BgAtGElTervsXrFuDH6xufL_GvsXP-tU6bxvz8_Ud8SxGG3rftXFkFjoY3y7wvR6azVtp2_4TnxIpxNkh2nO6ifbo_07Q0-XF4_w6Le-ubuazMq0pY31qJK8oFLV1pjIgM1GABF3rwgFk2hJHiak5rbkdVwvJtWRQFZRzC07KKmMTdLLNXYXufbCxV8tuCO1YqSiVLGMSYITSLVSHLsZgnVoF_6bDWhFQf77U6EttfKnRF_sF_Etd3Q</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Paul, Gordon L.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Myth and Reality in Wakefield’s Assertions Regarding Paul and Lentz (1977)</title><author>Paul, Gordon L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-d96b208cefdbd09478090aca8f004ae1f21dc62c6e106796a930b8266e0f99b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Mental institutions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paul, Gordon L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology &amp; Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Behavior and social issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paul, Gordon L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Myth and Reality in Wakefield’s Assertions Regarding Paul and Lentz (1977)</atitle><jtitle>Behavior and social issues</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>244</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>244-252</pages><issn>1064-9506</issn><eissn>2376-6786</eissn><abstract>Wakefield's overall critique is typified by a lack of theoretical understanding of his presumed theoretical enemy and its evidence base, selective perception to a degree suggesting harmful dysfunction, out-of-context quotes, and arguments based on factually incorrect allegations-clearly so in his assertions regarding the procedures and evidence in the Paul and Lentz (1977) monograph.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.5210/bsi.v15i2.391</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-9506
ispartof Behavior and social issues, 2006-10, Vol.15 (2), p.244-252
issn 1064-9506
2376-6786
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_229343900
source Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociological Abstracts
subjects Behavior
Environmental economics
Medical treatment
Mental institutions
title Myth and Reality in Wakefield’s Assertions Regarding Paul and Lentz (1977)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T08%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Myth%20and%20Reality%20in%20Wakefield%E2%80%99s%20Assertions%20Regarding%20Paul%20and%20Lentz%20(1977)&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20and%20social%20issues&rft.au=Paul,%20Gordon%20L.&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=244&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=244-252&rft.issn=1064-9506&rft.eissn=2376-6786&rft_id=info:doi/10.5210/bsi.v15i2.391&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1193571271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-d96b208cefdbd09478090aca8f004ae1f21dc62c6e106796a930b8266e0f99b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229343900&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true