Loading…

Cross-company vs. single-company web effort models using the Tukutuku database: An extended study

In 2004 [Kitchenham, B.A., Mendes, E., 2004a. Software productivity measurement using multiple size measures. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30 (12), 1023–1035, Kitchenham, B.A., Mendes, E., 2004b. A comparison of cross-company and single-company effort estimation models for web applicati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of systems and software 2008-05, Vol.81 (5), p.673-690
Main Authors: Mendes, Emilia, Di Martino, Sergio, Ferrucci, Filomena, Gravino, Carmine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-a61664cca7798264c7a5b8e4187c6cc560752ff8c6c076547af771f0f7c57a623
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-a61664cca7798264c7a5b8e4187c6cc560752ff8c6c076547af771f0f7c57a623
container_end_page 690
container_issue 5
container_start_page 673
container_title The Journal of systems and software
container_volume 81
creator Mendes, Emilia
Di Martino, Sergio
Ferrucci, Filomena
Gravino, Carmine
description In 2004 [Kitchenham, B.A., Mendes, E., 2004a. Software productivity measurement using multiple size measures. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30 (12), 1023–1035, Kitchenham, B.A., Mendes, E., 2004b. A comparison of cross-company and single-company effort estimation models for web applications. In: Proceedings Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE’ 04), pp. 47–55] (S1) investigated, using data on 63 Web projects, to what extent a cross-company cost model could be successfully employed to estimate development effort for single-company Web projects. Their effort models were built using Forward Stepwise Regression (SWR) and they found that cross-company predictions were significantly worse than single-company predictions. This study S1 was extended by Mendes and Kitchenham [Mendes, E., Kitchenham, B.A., 2004. Further comparison of cross-company and within company effort estimation models for web applications. In: Proceedings International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS’04), Chicago, Illinois, September 11–17th, 2004. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 348–357] (S2), who used SWR and Case-based reasoning (CBR), and data on 67 Web projects from the Tukutuku database. They built two cross-company and one single-company models and found that both SWR cross-company models and CBR cross-company data provided predictions significantly worse than single-company predictions. Since 2004 another 83 projects were volunteered to the Tukutuku database, and recently used by Mendes et al. [Mendes, E., Di Martino, S., Ferrucci, F., Gravino, C., in press. Effort estimation: How valuable is it for a web company to use a cross-company data set, compared to using its own single-company data set? In: Proceedings of International World Wide Web Conference (WWW’07), Banff, Canada, 8–12 May] (S3), who partially replicated Mendes and Kitchenham’s study (S2), using SWR and CBR. They corroborated some of S2’s findings (SWR cross-company model and the CBR cross-company data provided predictions significantly worse than single-company predictions) however they replicated only part of S2. The objective of this paper (S4) is therefore to extend Mendes et al.’s work and fully replicate S2. We used the same dataset used in S3, and our results corroborated most of those obtained in S2. The main difference between S2 and our study was that one of our SWR cross-company models showed significantly similar predictions to the single-company model, which contradicts the findi
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.044
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_229545346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0164121207002385</els_id><sourcerecordid>1453591101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-a61664cca7798264c7a5b8e4187c6cc560752ff8c6c076547af771f0f7c57a623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PAyEQxYnRxFr9AN6I912BZWGrp6bxX2LipZ4JhUF3bZcKbLXfXjY1Hk1mwgz5Pch7CF1SUlJCxXVXdjGWjBBZjsX5EZrQRlYFZaw5RpPM8DxTdorOYuxIBhlhE6QXwcdYGL_Z6n6Pd7HEse3f1vB39QUrDM75kPDGW1hHPIwETu-Al8PHkHJjq5Ne6Qg3eN5j-E7QW7A4psHuz9GJ0-sIF7_nFL3e3y0Xj8Xzy8PTYv5cmGpGUqEFFYIbo6WcNSxPUterBng2YYQxtSCyZs41eSFS1FxqJyV1xElTSy1YNUVXh3e3wX8OEJPq_BD6_KVibFbzuuIiQ_QAmdF2AKe2od3osFeUqDFI1akcpBqDVGNxnjW3B032DrsWgoqmhd6AbQOYpKxv_1H_AMiye6o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229545346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-company vs. single-company web effort models using the Tukutuku database: An extended study</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Mendes, Emilia ; Di Martino, Sergio ; Ferrucci, Filomena ; Gravino, Carmine</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Emilia ; Di Martino, Sergio ; Ferrucci, Filomena ; Gravino, Carmine</creatorcontrib><description>In 2004 [Kitchenham, B.A., Mendes, E., 2004a. Software productivity measurement using multiple size measures. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30 (12), 1023–1035, Kitchenham, B.A., Mendes, E., 2004b. A comparison of cross-company and single-company effort estimation models for web applications. In: Proceedings Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE’ 04), pp. 47–55] (S1) investigated, using data on 63 Web projects, to what extent a cross-company cost model could be successfully employed to estimate development effort for single-company Web projects. Their effort models were built using Forward Stepwise Regression (SWR) and they found that cross-company predictions were significantly worse than single-company predictions. This study S1 was extended by Mendes and Kitchenham [Mendes, E., Kitchenham, B.A., 2004. Further comparison of cross-company and within company effort estimation models for web applications. In: Proceedings International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS’04), Chicago, Illinois, September 11–17th, 2004. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 348–357] (S2), who used SWR and Case-based reasoning (CBR), and data on 67 Web projects from the Tukutuku database. They built two cross-company and one single-company models and found that both SWR cross-company models and CBR cross-company data provided predictions significantly worse than single-company predictions. Since 2004 another 83 projects were volunteered to the Tukutuku database, and recently used by Mendes et al. [Mendes, E., Di Martino, S., Ferrucci, F., Gravino, C., in press. Effort estimation: How valuable is it for a web company to use a cross-company data set, compared to using its own single-company data set? In: Proceedings of International World Wide Web Conference (WWW’07), Banff, Canada, 8–12 May] (S3), who partially replicated Mendes and Kitchenham’s study (S2), using SWR and CBR. They corroborated some of S2’s findings (SWR cross-company model and the CBR cross-company data provided predictions significantly worse than single-company predictions) however they replicated only part of S2. The objective of this paper (S4) is therefore to extend Mendes et al.’s work and fully replicate S2. We used the same dataset used in S3, and our results corroborated most of those obtained in S2. The main difference between S2 and our study was that one of our SWR cross-company models showed significantly similar predictions to the single-company model, which contradicts the findings from S2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0164-1212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1228</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.044</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSSODM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Estimating techniques ; Productivity measurement ; Regression analysis ; Software engineering ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of systems and software, 2008-05, Vol.81 (5), p.673-690</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. May 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-a61664cca7798264c7a5b8e4187c6cc560752ff8c6c076547af771f0f7c57a623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-a61664cca7798264c7a5b8e4187c6cc560752ff8c6c076547af771f0f7c57a623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Emilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Martino, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrucci, Filomena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravino, Carmine</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-company vs. single-company web effort models using the Tukutuku database: An extended study</title><title>The Journal of systems and software</title><description>In 2004 [Kitchenham, B.A., Mendes, E., 2004a. Software productivity measurement using multiple size measures. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30 (12), 1023–1035, Kitchenham, B.A., Mendes, E., 2004b. A comparison of cross-company and single-company effort estimation models for web applications. In: Proceedings Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE’ 04), pp. 47–55] (S1) investigated, using data on 63 Web projects, to what extent a cross-company cost model could be successfully employed to estimate development effort for single-company Web projects. Their effort models were built using Forward Stepwise Regression (SWR) and they found that cross-company predictions were significantly worse than single-company predictions. This study S1 was extended by Mendes and Kitchenham [Mendes, E., Kitchenham, B.A., 2004. Further comparison of cross-company and within company effort estimation models for web applications. In: Proceedings International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS’04), Chicago, Illinois, September 11–17th, 2004. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 348–357] (S2), who used SWR and Case-based reasoning (CBR), and data on 67 Web projects from the Tukutuku database. They built two cross-company and one single-company models and found that both SWR cross-company models and CBR cross-company data provided predictions significantly worse than single-company predictions. Since 2004 another 83 projects were volunteered to the Tukutuku database, and recently used by Mendes et al. [Mendes, E., Di Martino, S., Ferrucci, F., Gravino, C., in press. Effort estimation: How valuable is it for a web company to use a cross-company data set, compared to using its own single-company data set? In: Proceedings of International World Wide Web Conference (WWW’07), Banff, Canada, 8–12 May] (S3), who partially replicated Mendes and Kitchenham’s study (S2), using SWR and CBR. They corroborated some of S2’s findings (SWR cross-company model and the CBR cross-company data provided predictions significantly worse than single-company predictions) however they replicated only part of S2. The objective of this paper (S4) is therefore to extend Mendes et al.’s work and fully replicate S2. We used the same dataset used in S3, and our results corroborated most of those obtained in S2. The main difference between S2 and our study was that one of our SWR cross-company models showed significantly similar predictions to the single-company model, which contradicts the findings from S2.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Estimating techniques</subject><subject>Productivity measurement</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0164-1212</issn><issn>1873-1228</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9PAyEQxYnRxFr9AN6I912BZWGrp6bxX2LipZ4JhUF3bZcKbLXfXjY1Hk1mwgz5Pch7CF1SUlJCxXVXdjGWjBBZjsX5EZrQRlYFZaw5RpPM8DxTdorOYuxIBhlhE6QXwcdYGL_Z6n6Pd7HEse3f1vB39QUrDM75kPDGW1hHPIwETu-Al8PHkHJjq5Ne6Qg3eN5j-E7QW7A4psHuz9GJ0-sIF7_nFL3e3y0Xj8Xzy8PTYv5cmGpGUqEFFYIbo6WcNSxPUterBng2YYQxtSCyZs41eSFS1FxqJyV1xElTSy1YNUVXh3e3wX8OEJPq_BD6_KVibFbzuuIiQ_QAmdF2AKe2od3osFeUqDFI1akcpBqDVGNxnjW3B032DrsWgoqmhd6AbQOYpKxv_1H_AMiye6o</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Mendes, Emilia</creator><creator>Di Martino, Sergio</creator><creator>Ferrucci, Filomena</creator><creator>Gravino, Carmine</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Cross-company vs. single-company web effort models using the Tukutuku database: An extended study</title><author>Mendes, Emilia ; Di Martino, Sergio ; Ferrucci, Filomena ; Gravino, Carmine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-a61664cca7798264c7a5b8e4187c6cc560752ff8c6c076547af771f0f7c57a623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Estimating techniques</topic><topic>Productivity measurement</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Emilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Martino, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrucci, Filomena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravino, Carmine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of systems and software</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendes, Emilia</au><au>Di Martino, Sergio</au><au>Ferrucci, Filomena</au><au>Gravino, Carmine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-company vs. single-company web effort models using the Tukutuku database: An extended study</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of systems and software</jtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>673</spage><epage>690</epage><pages>673-690</pages><issn>0164-1212</issn><eissn>1873-1228</eissn><coden>JSSODM</coden><abstract>In 2004 [Kitchenham, B.A., Mendes, E., 2004a. Software productivity measurement using multiple size measures. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30 (12), 1023–1035, Kitchenham, B.A., Mendes, E., 2004b. A comparison of cross-company and single-company effort estimation models for web applications. In: Proceedings Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE’ 04), pp. 47–55] (S1) investigated, using data on 63 Web projects, to what extent a cross-company cost model could be successfully employed to estimate development effort for single-company Web projects. Their effort models were built using Forward Stepwise Regression (SWR) and they found that cross-company predictions were significantly worse than single-company predictions. This study S1 was extended by Mendes and Kitchenham [Mendes, E., Kitchenham, B.A., 2004. Further comparison of cross-company and within company effort estimation models for web applications. In: Proceedings International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS’04), Chicago, Illinois, September 11–17th, 2004. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 348–357] (S2), who used SWR and Case-based reasoning (CBR), and data on 67 Web projects from the Tukutuku database. They built two cross-company and one single-company models and found that both SWR cross-company models and CBR cross-company data provided predictions significantly worse than single-company predictions. Since 2004 another 83 projects were volunteered to the Tukutuku database, and recently used by Mendes et al. [Mendes, E., Di Martino, S., Ferrucci, F., Gravino, C., in press. Effort estimation: How valuable is it for a web company to use a cross-company data set, compared to using its own single-company data set? In: Proceedings of International World Wide Web Conference (WWW’07), Banff, Canada, 8–12 May] (S3), who partially replicated Mendes and Kitchenham’s study (S2), using SWR and CBR. They corroborated some of S2’s findings (SWR cross-company model and the CBR cross-company data provided predictions significantly worse than single-company predictions) however they replicated only part of S2. The objective of this paper (S4) is therefore to extend Mendes et al.’s work and fully replicate S2. We used the same dataset used in S3, and our results corroborated most of those obtained in S2. The main difference between S2 and our study was that one of our SWR cross-company models showed significantly similar predictions to the single-company model, which contradicts the findings from S2.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.044</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0164-1212
ispartof The Journal of systems and software, 2008-05, Vol.81 (5), p.673-690
issn 0164-1212
1873-1228
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_229545346
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Comparative analysis
Estimating techniques
Productivity measurement
Regression analysis
Software engineering
Studies
title Cross-company vs. single-company web effort models using the Tukutuku database: An extended study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-company%20vs.%20single-company%20web%20effort%20models%20using%20the%20Tukutuku%20database:%20An%20extended%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20systems%20and%20software&rft.au=Mendes,%20Emilia&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=673&rft.epage=690&rft.pages=673-690&rft.issn=0164-1212&rft.eissn=1873-1228&rft.coden=JSSODM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1453591101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-a61664cca7798264c7a5b8e4187c6cc560752ff8c6c076547af771f0f7c57a623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229545346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true