Are baby foods as innocent as they may look?

A 2011 survey of commercially available baby foods (targeting infants

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2018, Vol.77 (OCE3), Article E81
Main Authors: Geraghty, C.J., Taleghani, S., O'Mahony, S., Lyons, O.C., Donovan, C.M., O'Donovan, C.B., Flynn, M.A.T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Babies
Baby foods
Breakfast foods
Cereals
Essential nutrients
Food
Food availability
Food safety
Gluten
Infants
Nutrients
Nutrition
Product names
Salt
Sugar
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205x-576166bbc42687e1a3c898fadf5a70146ef2167fa71ccbcf78290c1a66185d463
cites
container_end_page
container_issue OCE3
container_start_page
container_title Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
container_volume 77
creator Geraghty, C.J.
Taleghani, S.
O'Mahony, S.
Lyons, O.C.
Donovan, C.M.
O'Donovan, C.B.
Flynn, M.A.T.
description A 2011 survey of commercially available baby foods (targeting infants
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S002966511800085X
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2300615529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S002966511800085X</cupid><sourcerecordid>2300615529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205x-576166bbc42687e1a3c898fadf5a70146ef2167fa71ccbcf78290c1a66185d463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMoWFc_gLeCV6szaTNJT7Is_oMFDyp4K2maaNfdZk12wX57W3bBg3iaB-_93sBj7BzhCgHl9TMAL4kEogIAJd4OWIKFFBmXWB6yZLSz0T9mJzEuAJAKRQm7nAab1rruU-d9E1Md07brvLHdZtSbD9unK92nS-8_b07ZkdPLaM_2d8Je725fZg_Z_On-cTadZ4aD-M6EJCSqa1NwUtKizo0qldONE1oCFmQdR5JOSzSmNk4qXoJBTYRKNAXlE3ax610H_7W1cVMt_DZ0w8uK5wCEQvBySOEuZYKPMVhXrUO70qGvEKpxlOrPKAOT7xm9qkPbvNvf6v-pH0BcYS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2300615529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are baby foods as innocent as they may look?</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Geraghty, C.J. ; Taleghani, S. ; O'Mahony, S. ; Lyons, O.C. ; Donovan, C.M. ; O'Donovan, C.B. ; Flynn, M.A.T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Geraghty, C.J. ; Taleghani, S. ; O'Mahony, S. ; Lyons, O.C. ; Donovan, C.M. ; O'Donovan, C.B. ; Flynn, M.A.T.</creatorcontrib><description>A 2011 survey of commercially available baby foods (targeting infants &lt;12 months) found that 15% were inappropriate due to levels of added fat, sugar or salt and a lack of essential nutrients(2). Data collected included product name, brand, targeted age group (months), meal type, portion size, presence of gluten and nutritional information per 100 g. In addition, the presence of nutrition and health claims and saturated fat content was collected in 2017. While some improvements in baby foods marketed in Ireland in 2017 compared with 2011 were evident (e.g. reduced salt, higher fibre), there was an overall increase in baby foods deemed to be inappropriate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-6651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2719</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S002966511800085X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Babies ; Baby foods ; Breakfast foods ; Cereals ; Essential nutrients ; Food ; Food availability ; Food safety ; Gluten ; Infants ; Nutrients ; Nutrition ; Product names ; Salt ; Sugar</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2018, Vol.77 (OCE3), Article E81</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205x-576166bbc42687e1a3c898fadf5a70146ef2167fa71ccbcf78290c1a66185d463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002966511800085X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,72931</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geraghty, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taleghani, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Mahony, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, O.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donovan, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donovan, C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, M.A.T.</creatorcontrib><title>Are baby foods as innocent as they may look?</title><title>Proceedings of the Nutrition Society</title><addtitle>Proc. Nutr. Soc</addtitle><description>A 2011 survey of commercially available baby foods (targeting infants &lt;12 months) found that 15% were inappropriate due to levels of added fat, sugar or salt and a lack of essential nutrients(2). Data collected included product name, brand, targeted age group (months), meal type, portion size, presence of gluten and nutritional information per 100 g. In addition, the presence of nutrition and health claims and saturated fat content was collected in 2017. While some improvements in baby foods marketed in Ireland in 2017 compared with 2011 were evident (e.g. reduced salt, higher fibre), there was an overall increase in baby foods deemed to be inappropriate.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Baby foods</subject><subject>Breakfast foods</subject><subject>Cereals</subject><subject>Essential nutrients</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Gluten</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Product names</subject><subject>Salt</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><issn>0029-6651</issn><issn>1475-2719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMoWFc_gLeCV6szaTNJT7Is_oMFDyp4K2maaNfdZk12wX57W3bBg3iaB-_93sBj7BzhCgHl9TMAL4kEogIAJd4OWIKFFBmXWB6yZLSz0T9mJzEuAJAKRQm7nAab1rruU-d9E1Md07brvLHdZtSbD9unK92nS-8_b07ZkdPLaM_2d8Je725fZg_Z_On-cTadZ4aD-M6EJCSqa1NwUtKizo0qldONE1oCFmQdR5JOSzSmNk4qXoJBTYRKNAXlE3ax610H_7W1cVMt_DZ0w8uK5wCEQvBySOEuZYKPMVhXrUO70qGvEKpxlOrPKAOT7xm9qkPbvNvf6v-pH0BcYS8</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Geraghty, C.J.</creator><creator>Taleghani, S.</creator><creator>O'Mahony, S.</creator><creator>Lyons, O.C.</creator><creator>Donovan, C.M.</creator><creator>O'Donovan, C.B.</creator><creator>Flynn, M.A.T.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Are baby foods as innocent as they may look?</title><author>Geraghty, C.J. ; Taleghani, S. ; O'Mahony, S. ; Lyons, O.C. ; Donovan, C.M. ; O'Donovan, C.B. ; Flynn, M.A.T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205x-576166bbc42687e1a3c898fadf5a70146ef2167fa71ccbcf78290c1a66185d463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Baby foods</topic><topic>Breakfast foods</topic><topic>Cereals</topic><topic>Essential nutrients</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Gluten</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Product names</topic><topic>Salt</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geraghty, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taleghani, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Mahony, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, O.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donovan, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donovan, C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, M.A.T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Nutrition Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geraghty, C.J.</au><au>Taleghani, S.</au><au>O'Mahony, S.</au><au>Lyons, O.C.</au><au>Donovan, C.M.</au><au>O'Donovan, C.B.</au><au>Flynn, M.A.T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are baby foods as innocent as they may look?</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Nutrition Society</jtitle><addtitle>Proc. Nutr. Soc</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>OCE3</issue><artnum>E81</artnum><issn>0029-6651</issn><eissn>1475-2719</eissn><abstract>A 2011 survey of commercially available baby foods (targeting infants &lt;12 months) found that 15% were inappropriate due to levels of added fat, sugar or salt and a lack of essential nutrients(2). Data collected included product name, brand, targeted age group (months), meal type, portion size, presence of gluten and nutritional information per 100 g. In addition, the presence of nutrition and health claims and saturated fat content was collected in 2017. While some improvements in baby foods marketed in Ireland in 2017 compared with 2011 were evident (e.g. reduced salt, higher fibre), there was an overall increase in baby foods deemed to be inappropriate.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S002966511800085X</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-6651
ispartof Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2018, Vol.77 (OCE3), Article E81
issn 0029-6651
1475-2719
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2300615529
source Cambridge University Press
subjects Babies
Baby foods
Breakfast foods
Cereals
Essential nutrients
Food
Food availability
Food safety
Gluten
Infants
Nutrients
Nutrition
Product names
Salt
Sugar
title Are baby foods as innocent as they may look?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T07%3A36%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20baby%20foods%20as%20innocent%20as%20they%20may%20look?&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Nutrition%20Society&rft.au=Geraghty,%20C.J.&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=OCE3&rft.artnum=E81&rft.issn=0029-6651&rft.eissn=1475-2719&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S002966511800085X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2300615529%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205x-576166bbc42687e1a3c898fadf5a70146ef2167fa71ccbcf78290c1a66185d463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2300615529&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S002966511800085X&rfr_iscdi=true