Meta‐Analysis of Integrated Primary and Behavioral Health Care Interventions for Treating Substance Use Among Adults

This meta‐analysis detected low effects in reducing substance use (Hedges's g = –0.11) in favor of using integrated primary and behavioral health care (IPBH) compared with treatment‐as‐usual approaches for adult patients with substance use. The impact of IPBH was limited.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of addictions & offender counseling 2019-10, Vol.40 (2), p.84-95
Main Authors: Balkin, Richard S., Lenz, A. Stephen, Dell'Aquila, Julia, Gregory, Halie M., Rines, Miranda N., Swinford, Katelyn E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Drug abuse
Drug use
integrated care
integrated primary and behavioral health care
Meta-analysis
outcome evaluation
Substance abuse treatment
substance use
Systematic review
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This meta‐analysis detected low effects in reducing substance use (Hedges's g = –0.11) in favor of using integrated primary and behavioral health care (IPBH) compared with treatment‐as‐usual approaches for adult patients with substance use. The impact of IPBH was limited.
ISSN:1055-3835
2161-1874
DOI:10.1002/jaoc.12067