Amending the Migratory Bird Treaty Act

Three years ago, a court decision ruled that the introduced, non-native mute swan (Cygnus olor) was afforded protections of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. This decision has significantly hindered wildlife managers' ability to control the rapid expansion of mute swans, negatively impacting other...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Society bulletin 2004-10, Vol.32 (3), p.967
Main Authors: Burke, Caitlin A, Franklin, Thomas M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Amendments
Animal migration
Birds
Court decisions
Federal legislation
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 967
container_title Wildlife Society bulletin
container_volume 32
creator Burke, Caitlin A
Franklin, Thomas M
description Three years ago, a court decision ruled that the introduced, non-native mute swan (Cygnus olor) was afforded protections of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. This decision has significantly hindered wildlife managers' ability to control the rapid expansion of mute swans, negatively impacting other sensitive wildlife and habitat.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_230183966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>732801951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2301839663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDS20DU1MTNmYeA0MLA01DU3M7HgYOAqLs4yMDAwMzA052RQc8xNzUvJzEtXKMlIVfDNTC9KLMkvqlRwyixKUQgpSk0sqVRwTC7hYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4I2MDQwtjSzMzY6IUAQB3GS-x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230183966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amending the Migratory Bird Treaty Act</title><source>Access via JSTOR</source><creator>Burke, Caitlin A ; Franklin, Thomas M</creator><creatorcontrib>Burke, Caitlin A ; Franklin, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><description>Three years ago, a court decision ruled that the introduced, non-native mute swan (Cygnus olor) was afforded protections of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. This decision has significantly hindered wildlife managers' ability to control the rapid expansion of mute swans, negatively impacting other sensitive wildlife and habitat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WLSBA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Amendments ; Animal migration ; Birds ; Court decisions ; Federal legislation</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Society bulletin, 2004-10, Vol.32 (3), p.967</ispartof><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Fall 2004</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burke, Caitlin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><title>Amending the Migratory Bird Treaty Act</title><title>Wildlife Society bulletin</title><description>Three years ago, a court decision ruled that the introduced, non-native mute swan (Cygnus olor) was afforded protections of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. This decision has significantly hindered wildlife managers' ability to control the rapid expansion of mute swans, negatively impacting other sensitive wildlife and habitat.</description><subject>Amendments</subject><subject>Animal migration</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Federal legislation</subject><issn>0091-7648</issn><issn>1938-5463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDS20DU1MTNmYeA0MLA01DU3M7HgYOAqLs4yMDAwMzA052RQc8xNzUvJzEtXKMlIVfDNTC9KLMkvqlRwyixKUQgpSk0sqVRwTC7hYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4I2MDQwtjSzMzY6IUAQB3GS-x</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Burke, Caitlin A</creator><creator>Franklin, Thomas M</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Amending the Migratory Bird Treaty Act</title><author>Burke, Caitlin A ; Franklin, Thomas M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2301839663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Amendments</topic><topic>Animal migration</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Federal legislation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burke, Caitlin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burke, Caitlin A</au><au>Franklin, Thomas M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amending the Migratory Bird Treaty Act</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>967</spage><pages>967-</pages><issn>0091-7648</issn><eissn>1938-5463</eissn><coden>WLSBA6</coden><abstract>Three years ago, a court decision ruled that the introduced, non-native mute swan (Cygnus olor) was afforded protections of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. This decision has significantly hindered wildlife managers' ability to control the rapid expansion of mute swans, negatively impacting other sensitive wildlife and habitat.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-7648
ispartof Wildlife Society bulletin, 2004-10, Vol.32 (3), p.967
issn 0091-7648
1938-5463
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_230183966
source Access via JSTOR
subjects Amendments
Animal migration
Birds
Court decisions
Federal legislation
title Amending the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A50%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amending%20the%20Migratory%20Bird%20Treaty%20Act&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Society%20bulletin&rft.au=Burke,%20Caitlin%20A&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=967&rft.pages=967-&rft.issn=0091-7648&rft.eissn=1938-5463&rft.coden=WLSBA6&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E732801951%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2301839663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230183966&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true