Loading…
Reuse of annual set-aside lands: implications for wildlife
Most farms in our study area in northwest Indiana with an Acreage Conservation Reserve (ACR) in 1992 also had ACR during each of the previous 5 years. Most farms in 1992 used some of the same land to satisfy their ACR requirements in 1991 and 1992; however, only 38.6% of 1992 farms reused ACR each y...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Wildlife Society bulletin 1996-12, Vol.24 (4), p.655-659 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 659 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 655 |
| container_title | Wildlife Society bulletin |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Frawley, B.J. (Indiana Department of Natural Resources, West Lafayette, IN.) Walters, S |
| description | Most farms in our study area in northwest Indiana with an Acreage Conservation Reserve (ACR) in 1992 also had ACR during each of the previous 5 years. Most farms in 1992 used some of the same land to satisfy their ACR requirements in 1991 and 1992; however, only 38.6% of 1992 farms reused ACR each year from 1987 to 1992. Thus far, cost-share assistance provided by the Consolidated Farm Service Agency (CFSA) has been ineffective in establishing appreciable amounts of perennial vegetation in the Midwest. Wildlife management agencies need to persuade the CFSA and farmers that multiyear set-asides are compatible with current farm management. |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_230204462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3783154</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3783154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f220t-42136f8d6dcb512fb189870f1bc0d9db7de7976bd7b2d865fc43015d11e31e463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk1LxDAURYMoWEf_gLgI7gvvJWmSzk4Gv2BAUGdd0iaRlE5Tkxbx31sYV3dxDvfeM1JgzXVZCcnPSQFQY6mk0JfkKuceACSgKsj23S3Z0eipGcfFDDS7uTQ5WEcHM9q8peE4DaEzc4hjpj4m-hMGOwTvrsmFN0N2N_-5IYenx8_dS7l_e37dPexLzxjMpWDIpddW2q6tkPkWda0VeGw7sLVtlXWqVrK1qmVWy8p3ggNWFtFxdOv7Dbk_9U4pfi8uz00flzSukw3jwEAIyVbp7iT1eY6pmVI4mvTbcKU5VmLFtyfsTWzMVwq5OXzUCpRA5H98FVTl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230204462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reuse of annual set-aside lands: implications for wildlife</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Frawley, B.J. (Indiana Department of Natural Resources, West Lafayette, IN.) ; Walters, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Frawley, B.J. (Indiana Department of Natural Resources, West Lafayette, IN.) ; Walters, S</creatorcontrib><description>Most farms in our study area in northwest Indiana with an Acreage Conservation Reserve (ACR) in 1992 also had ACR during each of the previous 5 years. Most farms in 1992 used some of the same land to satisfy their ACR requirements in 1991 and 1992; however, only 38.6% of 1992 farms reused ACR each year from 1987 to 1992. Thus far, cost-share assistance provided by the Consolidated Farm Service Agency (CFSA) has been ineffective in establishing appreciable amounts of perennial vegetation in the Midwest. Wildlife management agencies need to persuade the CFSA and farmers that multiyear set-asides are compatible with current farm management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WLSBA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural management ; Agricultural subsidies ; Agriculture ; CONSERVATION ; conservation reserve program ; Crops ; Farmers ; FARMLAND ; Farmlands ; Farms ; FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES ; GESTION FONCIERE ; Grasslands ; INDIANA ; LAND MANAGEMENT ; Land use ; Management ; ORDENACION DE TIERRAS ; Private land ; TERRE AGRICOLE ; TIERRAS AGRICOLAS ; VIDA SILVESTRE ; WILDLIFE ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Society bulletin, 1996-12, Vol.24 (4), p.655-659</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Winter 1996</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3783154$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3783154$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frawley, B.J. (Indiana Department of Natural Resources, West Lafayette, IN.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, S</creatorcontrib><title>Reuse of annual set-aside lands: implications for wildlife</title><title>Wildlife Society bulletin</title><description>Most farms in our study area in northwest Indiana with an Acreage Conservation Reserve (ACR) in 1992 also had ACR during each of the previous 5 years. Most farms in 1992 used some of the same land to satisfy their ACR requirements in 1991 and 1992; however, only 38.6% of 1992 farms reused ACR each year from 1987 to 1992. Thus far, cost-share assistance provided by the Consolidated Farm Service Agency (CFSA) has been ineffective in establishing appreciable amounts of perennial vegetation in the Midwest. Wildlife management agencies need to persuade the CFSA and farmers that multiyear set-asides are compatible with current farm management.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural subsidies</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>CONSERVATION</subject><subject>conservation reserve program</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>FARMLAND</subject><subject>Farmlands</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES</subject><subject>GESTION FONCIERE</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>INDIANA</subject><subject>LAND MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>ORDENACION DE TIERRAS</subject><subject>Private land</subject><subject>TERRE AGRICOLE</subject><subject>TIERRAS AGRICOLAS</subject><subject>VIDA SILVESTRE</subject><subject>WILDLIFE</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0091-7648</issn><issn>1938-5463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjk1LxDAURYMoWEf_gLgI7gvvJWmSzk4Gv2BAUGdd0iaRlE5Tkxbx31sYV3dxDvfeM1JgzXVZCcnPSQFQY6mk0JfkKuceACSgKsj23S3Z0eipGcfFDDS7uTQ5WEcHM9q8peE4DaEzc4hjpj4m-hMGOwTvrsmFN0N2N_-5IYenx8_dS7l_e37dPexLzxjMpWDIpddW2q6tkPkWda0VeGw7sLVtlXWqVrK1qmVWy8p3ggNWFtFxdOv7Dbk_9U4pfi8uz00flzSukw3jwEAIyVbp7iT1eY6pmVI4mvTbcKU5VmLFtyfsTWzMVwq5OXzUCpRA5H98FVTl</recordid><startdate>19961201</startdate><enddate>19961201</enddate><creator>Frawley, B.J. (Indiana Department of Natural Resources, West Lafayette, IN.)</creator><creator>Walters, S</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961201</creationdate><title>Reuse of annual set-aside lands: implications for wildlife</title><author>Frawley, B.J. (Indiana Department of Natural Resources, West Lafayette, IN.) ; Walters, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f220t-42136f8d6dcb512fb189870f1bc0d9db7de7976bd7b2d865fc43015d11e31e463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural subsidies</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>CONSERVATION</topic><topic>conservation reserve program</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>FARMLAND</topic><topic>Farmlands</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES</topic><topic>GESTION FONCIERE</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>INDIANA</topic><topic>LAND MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>ORDENACION DE TIERRAS</topic><topic>Private land</topic><topic>TERRE AGRICOLE</topic><topic>TIERRAS AGRICOLAS</topic><topic>VIDA SILVESTRE</topic><topic>WILDLIFE</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frawley, B.J. (Indiana Department of Natural Resources, West Lafayette, IN.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frawley, B.J. (Indiana Department of Natural Resources, West Lafayette, IN.)</au><au>Walters, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reuse of annual set-aside lands: implications for wildlife</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle><date>1996-12-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>655</spage><epage>659</epage><pages>655-659</pages><issn>0091-7648</issn><eissn>1938-5463</eissn><coden>WLSBA6</coden><abstract>Most farms in our study area in northwest Indiana with an Acreage Conservation Reserve (ACR) in 1992 also had ACR during each of the previous 5 years. Most farms in 1992 used some of the same land to satisfy their ACR requirements in 1991 and 1992; however, only 38.6% of 1992 farms reused ACR each year from 1987 to 1992. Thus far, cost-share assistance provided by the Consolidated Farm Service Agency (CFSA) has been ineffective in establishing appreciable amounts of perennial vegetation in the Midwest. Wildlife management agencies need to persuade the CFSA and farmers that multiyear set-asides are compatible with current farm management.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0091-7648 |
| ispartof | Wildlife Society bulletin, 1996-12, Vol.24 (4), p.655-659 |
| issn | 0091-7648 1938-5463 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_230204462 |
| source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
| subjects | Agricultural land Agricultural management Agricultural subsidies Agriculture CONSERVATION conservation reserve program Crops Farmers FARMLAND Farmlands Farms FAUNE ET FLORE SAUVAGES GESTION FONCIERE Grasslands INDIANA LAND MANAGEMENT Land use Management ORDENACION DE TIERRAS Private land TERRE AGRICOLE TIERRAS AGRICOLAS VIDA SILVESTRE WILDLIFE Wildlife management |
| title | Reuse of annual set-aside lands: implications for wildlife |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A23%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reuse%20of%20annual%20set-aside%20lands:%20implications%20for%20wildlife&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Society%20bulletin&rft.au=Frawley,%20B.J.%20(Indiana%20Department%20of%20Natural%20Resources,%20West%20Lafayette,%20IN.)&rft.date=1996-12-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=655&rft.epage=659&rft.pages=655-659&rft.issn=0091-7648&rft.eissn=1938-5463&rft.coden=WLSBA6&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3783154%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f220t-42136f8d6dcb512fb189870f1bc0d9db7de7976bd7b2d865fc43015d11e31e463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230204462&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3783154&rfr_iscdi=true |