Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction

Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish between specific mechanical stimuli. To test this concept, we subjected C2C12 myotubes to cyclic uniaxial or multiaxial stretch. Both types of stretch induced an increase in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein ki...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology 2005, Vol.57 (1), p.C185-C194
Main Authors: HORNBERGER, Troy A, ARMSTRONG, Dustin D, KOH, Timothy J, BURKHOLDER, Thomas J, ESSER, Karyn A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Cell physiology
Cytoskeleton
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas
Medical sciences
Molecular and cellular biology
Muscular system
Other diseases. Semiology
Physical growth
Signal transduction
Signaling
Strain
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish between specific mechanical stimuli. To test this concept, we subjected C2C12 myotubes to cyclic uniaxial or multiaxial stretch. Both types of stretch induced an increase in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) phosphorylation, but only multiaxial stretch induced ribosomal S6 kinase (p70S6k) phosphorylation. Further results demonstrated that the signaling events specific to multiaxial stretch (p70S6k phosphorylation) were elicited by forces delivered through the elastic culture membrane and were not due to greater surface area deformations or localized regions of large tensile strain. Experiments performed using medium that was conditioned by multiaxial stretched myotubes indicated that a release of paracrine factors was not sufficient for the induction of signaling to p70S6k. Furthermore, incubation with gadolinium(III) chloride (500 microM), genistein (250 microM), PD-98059 (250 microM), bisindolylmaleimide I (20 microM), or LY-294002 (100 microM ) did not block the multiaxial stretch-induced signaling to p70S6k. However, disrupting the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D did block the multiaxial signaling to p70S6k, with no effect on signaling to PKB/Akt. These results demonstrate that specific types of mechanical stretch activate distinct signaling pathways, and we propose that this occurs through direct mechanosensory-mechanotransduction mechanisms and not through previously defined growth factor/receptor binding pathways. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0363-6143
1522-1563