Loading…
Experimental analysis of the effect of nano-metals and novel organic additives on performance and emissions of a diesel engine
The present study focuses on performance and emission characteristics of three emulsion fuels with different additives on a single cylinder CI engine. Each of these emulsified fuels is distinctively engineered to be an alternative fuel for diesel engines. The test fuels are diesel, biodiesel, an emu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Fuel processing technology 2019-12, Vol.196, p.106166, Article 106166 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The present study focuses on performance and emission characteristics of three emulsion fuels with different additives on a single cylinder CI engine. Each of these emulsified fuels is distinctively engineered to be an alternative fuel for diesel engines. The test fuels are diesel, biodiesel, an emulsion fuel with 86% biodiesel, 5% DEE, 3% Ethanol, 50 ppm CNT, 2% Water, 2% Tween 80 and 2% Span 80 (BD.CNT.DEE.E), an emulsion fuel with 86% biodiesel, 5% EHN, 3% Methanol, 50 ppm Al2O3, 2% Water, 2% Tween 80 and 2% Span 80 (BD.ALO.EHN.M) and an emulsion fuel with 86% biodiesel, 5% Glycerine, 3% Butanol, 50 ppm TiO2, 2% Water, 2% Tween 80 and 2% Span 80 (BD.TIO.GLC.B). Experimental results revealed that BD.CNT.DEE.E has significant improvement compared to diesel and biodiesel in every aspect of performance such as enhanced brake power and brake thermal efficiency by 8.1% and 4.5%, respectively along with the most BSFC reduction by 4%. It also shows exceptional reduction in all emissions compared to biodiesel by 26%, 7.5%, 9.2% and 36% in CO, UHC, NOx and smoke, respectively. BD.ALO.EHN.M also shows considerable improvement in performance including the highest brake thermal efficiency with 6% increment and decline in all emissions except UHC, compared to biodiesel. Finally, BD.TIO.GLC.B shows a slight drop in performance with 6.6% drop in brake thermal efficiency, but on the other hand it has the lowest smoke opacity by a plummet of 74.3%, 20% decline in CO and 10.7% reduction in NOx compared to biodiesel. Therefore, it can be deducted that the emulsion fuels with the proper additives including oxygenated fuels, nano metals, stabilizers, cetane improvers and mixture emulsifiers could ensure clean and renewable alternatives for diesel engines.
•BD.CNT.DEE.E shows significant improvement in every aspect of performance along with the most BSFC reduction.•BD.CNT.DEE.E shows reduction in all emissions compared to biodiesel.•BD.ALO.EHN.M shows the highest brake thermal efficiency with 6% increment and 2.7% improvement in BSFC.•BD.ALO.EHN.M has the greatest NOx reduction, considerable decline in smoke opacity and a deduction in CO emissions.•BD.TIO.GLC.B shows a slight drop in performance, but on the other hand it has the lowest smoke opacity, decline in CO and reduction in NOx. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-3820 1873-7188 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106166 |