Loading…

Outcomes of Second Arterial Conduits in Patients Undergoing Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Benefits of multiarterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting (CABG) are debated. This study sought to compare long-term survival, morbidity, and graft patency after multiarterial versus single-arterial CABG. Mandatory clinical registries linked with discharge databases were used to iden...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2019-11, Vol.74 (18), p.2238-2248
Main Authors: Chikwe, Joanna, Sun, Erick, Hannan, Edward L., Itagaki, Shinobu, Lee, Timothy, Adams, David H., Egorova, Natalia N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b4b4b84ef6382eaade757a392801687f14e3d75b74f0e04522d4cb3fd02a51c53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b4b4b84ef6382eaade757a392801687f14e3d75b74f0e04522d4cb3fd02a51c53
container_end_page 2248
container_issue 18
container_start_page 2238
container_title Journal of the American College of Cardiology
container_volume 74
creator Chikwe, Joanna
Sun, Erick
Hannan, Edward L.
Itagaki, Shinobu
Lee, Timothy
Adams, David H.
Egorova, Natalia N.
description Benefits of multiarterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting (CABG) are debated. This study sought to compare long-term survival, morbidity, and graft patency after multiarterial versus single-arterial CABG. Mandatory clinical registries linked with discharge databases were used to identify baseline and operative characteristics and outcomes of 42,714 patients undergoing CABG from 2005 through 2012. Patients with single-vessel disease, without arterial conduits, or undergoing emergency, reoperative, or concomitant procedures were excluded. Survival, stroke, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization rates were compared using Cox modeling, and patients were matched by propensity score. Median follow-up was 7.8 years (interquartile range: 5 to 10 years); last follow-up was December 31, 2016. Of the 26,124 patients, 3,647 (14.0%) underwent multiarterial CABG. Single-arterial CABG patients were older (mean 68 vs. 61 years; p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1043
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2309736316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109719376478</els_id><sourcerecordid>2309736316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b4b4b84ef6382eaade757a392801687f14e3d75b74f0e04522d4cb3fd02a51c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1KAzEQhYMoWn-eQJCA11uTzWaze-GFFv9AqVC9DmkyW7K0m5pkC30bn8UnM0vVS5mLYYZzZjgfQueUjCmh5VU7bpXW45zQekyqtCvYHhpRzquM8VrsoxERjGeU1OIIHYfQEkLKitaH6IjRUuRU1CO0mvZRuxUE7Bo8A-06g298BG_VEk_S1NsYsO2-Pl9VtNCl4b0z4BfOdgv80i-j3UAIMIi965Tf7uxbfLtdqxDwg1dNxLPeL9LyFB00ahng7KefoPf7u7fJY_Y8fXia3DxnmtV1zOZFqqqApmRVDkoZEFwoVudVyl2JhhbAjOBzUTQESMHz3BR6zhpDcsWp5uwEXe7urr376CFE2bred-mlzFniwcpEIKnYTqW9C8FDI9ferlIESYkcEMtWDojlgFiSSg6Ik-vi53Y_X4H58_wyTYLrnQBSwo0FL4NO5DQY60FHaZz998E3jkWPAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2309736316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of Second Arterial Conduits in Patients Undergoing Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Chikwe, Joanna ; Sun, Erick ; Hannan, Edward L. ; Itagaki, Shinobu ; Lee, Timothy ; Adams, David H. ; Egorova, Natalia N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chikwe, Joanna ; Sun, Erick ; Hannan, Edward L. ; Itagaki, Shinobu ; Lee, Timothy ; Adams, David H. ; Egorova, Natalia N.</creatorcontrib><description>Benefits of multiarterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting (CABG) are debated. This study sought to compare long-term survival, morbidity, and graft patency after multiarterial versus single-arterial CABG. Mandatory clinical registries linked with discharge databases were used to identify baseline and operative characteristics and outcomes of 42,714 patients undergoing CABG from 2005 through 2012. Patients with single-vessel disease, without arterial conduits, or undergoing emergency, reoperative, or concomitant procedures were excluded. Survival, stroke, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization rates were compared using Cox modeling, and patients were matched by propensity score. Median follow-up was 7.8 years (interquartile range: 5 to 10 years); last follow-up was December 31, 2016. Of the 26,124 patients, 3,647 (14.0%) underwent multiarterial CABG. Single-arterial CABG patients were older (mean 68 vs. 61 years; p &lt; 0.001), had more comorbidities, and received fewer bypass grafts (3.4 vs. 3.6; p &lt; 0.001). After adjusting for baseline differences, multiarterial CABG was associated with lower 10-year mortality compared with single-arterial CABG in 3,588 propensity-matched pairs (15.1% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.01). Multiarterial CABG was associated with lower 10-year myocardial infarction (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.69 to 0.95) and lower 10-year reintervention rate (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 0.99). In contemporary practice, single-arterial CABG is used in 85% of patients and is associated with increased long-term mortality, myocardial infarction, and reintervention compared with multiarterial CABG. Multiarterial CABG is underused in contemporary surgical revascularization, and targeted referral of younger patients for multiarterial revascularization may address this practice gap. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31672179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; arterial graft ; Cardiology ; Cerebral infarction ; Clinical medicine ; Conduits ; Confidence intervals ; Coronary artery ; Coronary Artery Bypass ; Coronary Artery Disease - mortality ; Coronary Artery Disease - pathology ; Coronary Artery Disease - surgery ; coronary revascularization ; Coronary vessels ; Data collection ; Emergency procedures ; Female ; Grafting ; Grafts ; Health hazards ; Heart attacks ; Heart surgery ; Humans ; Identification methods ; Intubation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Myocardial infarction ; off-pump coronary bypass surgery ; on-pump coronary bypass surgery ; Patients ; Propensity Score ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Stroke ; Surgeons ; Survival ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome ; Variables ; Vascular Patency ; Vital statistics</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2019-11, Vol.74 (18), p.2238-2248</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 5, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b4b4b84ef6382eaade757a392801687f14e3d75b74f0e04522d4cb3fd02a51c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b4b4b84ef6382eaade757a392801687f14e3d75b74f0e04522d4cb3fd02a51c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31672179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chikwe, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannan, Edward L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Itagaki, Shinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egorova, Natalia N.</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of Second Arterial Conduits in Patients Undergoing Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>Benefits of multiarterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting (CABG) are debated. This study sought to compare long-term survival, morbidity, and graft patency after multiarterial versus single-arterial CABG. Mandatory clinical registries linked with discharge databases were used to identify baseline and operative characteristics and outcomes of 42,714 patients undergoing CABG from 2005 through 2012. Patients with single-vessel disease, without arterial conduits, or undergoing emergency, reoperative, or concomitant procedures were excluded. Survival, stroke, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization rates were compared using Cox modeling, and patients were matched by propensity score. Median follow-up was 7.8 years (interquartile range: 5 to 10 years); last follow-up was December 31, 2016. Of the 26,124 patients, 3,647 (14.0%) underwent multiarterial CABG. Single-arterial CABG patients were older (mean 68 vs. 61 years; p &lt; 0.001), had more comorbidities, and received fewer bypass grafts (3.4 vs. 3.6; p &lt; 0.001). After adjusting for baseline differences, multiarterial CABG was associated with lower 10-year mortality compared with single-arterial CABG in 3,588 propensity-matched pairs (15.1% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.01). Multiarterial CABG was associated with lower 10-year myocardial infarction (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.69 to 0.95) and lower 10-year reintervention rate (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 0.99). In contemporary practice, single-arterial CABG is used in 85% of patients and is associated with increased long-term mortality, myocardial infarction, and reintervention compared with multiarterial CABG. Multiarterial CABG is underused in contemporary surgical revascularization, and targeted referral of younger patients for multiarterial revascularization may address this practice gap. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>arterial graft</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cerebral infarction</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Conduits</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Coronary artery</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - mortality</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - pathology</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</subject><subject>coronary revascularization</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Emergency procedures</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>off-pump coronary bypass surgery</subject><subject>on-pump coronary bypass surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Vascular Patency</subject><subject>Vital statistics</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1KAzEQhYMoWn-eQJCA11uTzWaze-GFFv9AqVC9DmkyW7K0m5pkC30bn8UnM0vVS5mLYYZzZjgfQueUjCmh5VU7bpXW45zQekyqtCvYHhpRzquM8VrsoxERjGeU1OIIHYfQEkLKitaH6IjRUuRU1CO0mvZRuxUE7Bo8A-06g298BG_VEk_S1NsYsO2-Pl9VtNCl4b0z4BfOdgv80i-j3UAIMIi965Tf7uxbfLtdqxDwg1dNxLPeL9LyFB00ahng7KefoPf7u7fJY_Y8fXia3DxnmtV1zOZFqqqApmRVDkoZEFwoVudVyl2JhhbAjOBzUTQESMHz3BR6zhpDcsWp5uwEXe7urr376CFE2bred-mlzFniwcpEIKnYTqW9C8FDI9ferlIESYkcEMtWDojlgFiSSg6Ik-vi53Y_X4H58_wyTYLrnQBSwo0FL4NO5DQY60FHaZz998E3jkWPAQ</recordid><startdate>20191105</startdate><enddate>20191105</enddate><creator>Chikwe, Joanna</creator><creator>Sun, Erick</creator><creator>Hannan, Edward L.</creator><creator>Itagaki, Shinobu</creator><creator>Lee, Timothy</creator><creator>Adams, David H.</creator><creator>Egorova, Natalia N.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191105</creationdate><title>Outcomes of Second Arterial Conduits in Patients Undergoing Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery</title><author>Chikwe, Joanna ; Sun, Erick ; Hannan, Edward L. ; Itagaki, Shinobu ; Lee, Timothy ; Adams, David H. ; Egorova, Natalia N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b4b4b84ef6382eaade757a392801687f14e3d75b74f0e04522d4cb3fd02a51c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>arterial graft</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cerebral infarction</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Conduits</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Coronary artery</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - mortality</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - pathology</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</topic><topic>coronary revascularization</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Emergency procedures</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>off-pump coronary bypass surgery</topic><topic>on-pump coronary bypass surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Vascular Patency</topic><topic>Vital statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chikwe, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannan, Edward L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Itagaki, Shinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egorova, Natalia N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chikwe, Joanna</au><au>Sun, Erick</au><au>Hannan, Edward L.</au><au>Itagaki, Shinobu</au><au>Lee, Timothy</au><au>Adams, David H.</au><au>Egorova, Natalia N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of Second Arterial Conduits in Patients Undergoing Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2019-11-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>2238</spage><epage>2248</epage><pages>2238-2248</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>Benefits of multiarterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting (CABG) are debated. This study sought to compare long-term survival, morbidity, and graft patency after multiarterial versus single-arterial CABG. Mandatory clinical registries linked with discharge databases were used to identify baseline and operative characteristics and outcomes of 42,714 patients undergoing CABG from 2005 through 2012. Patients with single-vessel disease, without arterial conduits, or undergoing emergency, reoperative, or concomitant procedures were excluded. Survival, stroke, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization rates were compared using Cox modeling, and patients were matched by propensity score. Median follow-up was 7.8 years (interquartile range: 5 to 10 years); last follow-up was December 31, 2016. Of the 26,124 patients, 3,647 (14.0%) underwent multiarterial CABG. Single-arterial CABG patients were older (mean 68 vs. 61 years; p &lt; 0.001), had more comorbidities, and received fewer bypass grafts (3.4 vs. 3.6; p &lt; 0.001). After adjusting for baseline differences, multiarterial CABG was associated with lower 10-year mortality compared with single-arterial CABG in 3,588 propensity-matched pairs (15.1% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.01). Multiarterial CABG was associated with lower 10-year myocardial infarction (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.69 to 0.95) and lower 10-year reintervention rate (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 0.99). In contemporary practice, single-arterial CABG is used in 85% of patients and is associated with increased long-term mortality, myocardial infarction, and reintervention compared with multiarterial CABG. Multiarterial CABG is underused in contemporary surgical revascularization, and targeted referral of younger patients for multiarterial revascularization may address this practice gap. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31672179</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1043</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1097
ispartof Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2019-11, Vol.74 (18), p.2238-2248
issn 0735-1097
1558-3597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2309736316
source BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS
subjects Aged
arterial graft
Cardiology
Cerebral infarction
Clinical medicine
Conduits
Confidence intervals
Coronary artery
Coronary Artery Bypass
Coronary Artery Disease - mortality
Coronary Artery Disease - pathology
Coronary Artery Disease - surgery
coronary revascularization
Coronary vessels
Data collection
Emergency procedures
Female
Grafting
Grafts
Health hazards
Heart attacks
Heart surgery
Humans
Identification methods
Intubation
Male
Middle Aged
Morbidity
Mortality
Myocardial infarction
off-pump coronary bypass surgery
on-pump coronary bypass surgery
Patients
Propensity Score
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Stroke
Surgeons
Survival
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Variables
Vascular Patency
Vital statistics
title Outcomes of Second Arterial Conduits in Patients Undergoing Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A18%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20Second%20Arterial%20Conduits%20in%C2%A0Patients%20Undergoing%20Multivessel%20Coronary%20Artery%20Bypass%20Graft%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Chikwe,%20Joanna&rft.date=2019-11-05&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=2238&rft.epage=2248&rft.pages=2238-2248&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2309736316%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b4b4b84ef6382eaade757a392801687f14e3d75b74f0e04522d4cb3fd02a51c53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2309736316&rft_id=info:pmid/31672179&rfr_iscdi=true