Loading…

Methods for Measuring Gender Diversity Among College and University Faculty

We demonstrate how techniques that sociologists and geographers developed to study racial segregation of neighborhoods can provide a means to better evaluate gender equity in higher education. We demonstrate how four dimensions of diversity among the professorate can be calculated. We also discuss h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of higher education theory and practice 2019-10, Vol.19 (6), p.28-39
Main Authors: Bohon, Stephanie A, Nagle, Nicholas N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 39
container_issue 6
container_start_page 28
container_title Journal of higher education theory and practice
container_volume 19
creator Bohon, Stephanie A
Nagle, Nicholas N
description We demonstrate how techniques that sociologists and geographers developed to study racial segregation of neighborhoods can provide a means to better evaluate gender equity in higher education. We demonstrate how four dimensions of diversity among the professorate can be calculated. We also discuss how administrators armed with these kinds of information can better evaluate how their institution and departments are fairing over time and in relationship to the larger academic labor market. Administrators can also use these methods to develop a base for comparing their institution to peer and aspirational peer institutions.
doi_str_mv 10.33423/jhetp.v19i6.2302
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2310651946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2310651946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c706-8f401249d566dc95d3d81de6259fad58f87e0fce728f6e8b567d64efed9d72023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF9rwjAUxcPYYOL8AHsL7Lkuf5o0eRQ3dUzZi3sOXXOjLbXpklbw26_qGLsv53Lv4Rz4IfRIyZTzlPHnag9dOz1SXcop44TdoBGjQiVcaHH7b79HkxgrMowklKV0hN430O29jdj5gDeQxz6UzQ4vobEQ8Et5hBDL7oRnBz-c576uYQc4byz-bP6ei7zo6-70gO5cXkeY_OoYbRev2_kqWX8s3-azdVJkRCbKpedubYWUttDCcquoBcmEdrkVyqkMiCsgY8pJUF9CZlam4MBqmzHC-Bg9XWPb4L97iJ2pfB-aodEwTokUVKdycNGrqwg-xgDOtKE85OFkKDEXauZCzVyomTM1_gP8f2Gn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310651946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods for Measuring Gender Diversity Among College and University Faculty</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Bohon, Stephanie A ; Nagle, Nicholas N</creator><creatorcontrib>Bohon, Stephanie A ; Nagle, Nicholas N</creatorcontrib><description>We demonstrate how techniques that sociologists and geographers developed to study racial segregation of neighborhoods can provide a means to better evaluate gender equity in higher education. We demonstrate how four dimensions of diversity among the professorate can be calculated. We also discuss how administrators armed with these kinds of information can better evaluate how their institution and departments are fairing over time and in relationship to the larger academic labor market. Administrators can also use these methods to develop a base for comparing their institution to peer and aspirational peer institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2158-3595</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2158-3595</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.33423/jhetp.v19i6.2302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Palm Beach: North American Business Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; College Faculty ; Departments ; Engineering ; Faculty Promotion ; Females ; Gender equity ; Ghettos ; Grouping (Instructional Purposes) ; Higher education ; Labor market ; Libraries ; Males ; Medical School Faculty ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Neighborhoods ; Personnel Selection ; Race ; Racial Composition ; Racial Segregation ; Residential Patterns ; Science ; Segregation ; Sex Fairness ; Sociology ; Student Teacher Supervisors ; Tenure ; Universities ; Urban Studies ; Women ; Work Environment</subject><ispartof>Journal of higher education theory and practice, 2019-10, Vol.19 (6), p.28-39</ispartof><rights>Copyright North American Business Press 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2310651946/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2310651946?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21369,21385,27915,27916,33602,33868,43724,43871,73982,74158</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bohon, Stephanie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagle, Nicholas N</creatorcontrib><title>Methods for Measuring Gender Diversity Among College and University Faculty</title><title>Journal of higher education theory and practice</title><description>We demonstrate how techniques that sociologists and geographers developed to study racial segregation of neighborhoods can provide a means to better evaluate gender equity in higher education. We demonstrate how four dimensions of diversity among the professorate can be calculated. We also discuss how administrators armed with these kinds of information can better evaluate how their institution and departments are fairing over time and in relationship to the larger academic labor market. Administrators can also use these methods to develop a base for comparing their institution to peer and aspirational peer institutions.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Faculty Promotion</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Ghettos</subject><subject>Grouping (Instructional Purposes)</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical School Faculty</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Personnel Selection</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial Composition</subject><subject>Racial Segregation</subject><subject>Residential Patterns</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>Sex Fairness</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Student Teacher Supervisors</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Urban Studies</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Work Environment</subject><issn>2158-3595</issn><issn>2158-3595</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF9rwjAUxcPYYOL8AHsL7Lkuf5o0eRQ3dUzZi3sOXXOjLbXpklbw26_qGLsv53Lv4Rz4IfRIyZTzlPHnag9dOz1SXcop44TdoBGjQiVcaHH7b79HkxgrMowklKV0hN430O29jdj5gDeQxz6UzQ4vobEQ8Et5hBDL7oRnBz-c576uYQc4byz-bP6ei7zo6-70gO5cXkeY_OoYbRev2_kqWX8s3-azdVJkRCbKpedubYWUttDCcquoBcmEdrkVyqkMiCsgY8pJUF9CZlam4MBqmzHC-Bg9XWPb4L97iJ2pfB-aodEwTokUVKdycNGrqwg-xgDOtKE85OFkKDEXauZCzVyomTM1_gP8f2Gn</recordid><startdate>20191015</startdate><enddate>20191015</enddate><creator>Bohon, Stephanie A</creator><creator>Nagle, Nicholas N</creator><general>North American Business Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191015</creationdate><title>Methods for Measuring Gender Diversity Among College and University Faculty</title><author>Bohon, Stephanie A ; Nagle, Nicholas N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c706-8f401249d566dc95d3d81de6259fad58f87e0fce728f6e8b567d64efed9d72023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Faculty Promotion</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Ghettos</topic><topic>Grouping (Instructional Purposes)</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical School Faculty</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Personnel Selection</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial Composition</topic><topic>Racial Segregation</topic><topic>Residential Patterns</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>Sex Fairness</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Student Teacher Supervisors</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Urban Studies</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Work Environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bohon, Stephanie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagle, Nicholas N</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of higher education theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bohon, Stephanie A</au><au>Nagle, Nicholas N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods for Measuring Gender Diversity Among College and University Faculty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of higher education theory and practice</jtitle><date>2019-10-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>28-39</pages><issn>2158-3595</issn><eissn>2158-3595</eissn><abstract>We demonstrate how techniques that sociologists and geographers developed to study racial segregation of neighborhoods can provide a means to better evaluate gender equity in higher education. We demonstrate how four dimensions of diversity among the professorate can be calculated. We also discuss how administrators armed with these kinds of information can better evaluate how their institution and departments are fairing over time and in relationship to the larger academic labor market. Administrators can also use these methods to develop a base for comparing their institution to peer and aspirational peer institutions.</abstract><cop>West Palm Beach</cop><pub>North American Business Press</pub><doi>10.33423/jhetp.v19i6.2302</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2158-3595
ispartof Journal of higher education theory and practice, 2019-10, Vol.19 (6), p.28-39
issn 2158-3595
2158-3595
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2310651946
source Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Algorithms
College Faculty
Departments
Engineering
Faculty Promotion
Females
Gender equity
Ghettos
Grouping (Instructional Purposes)
Higher education
Labor market
Libraries
Males
Medical School Faculty
Minority & ethnic groups
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Neighborhoods
Personnel Selection
Race
Racial Composition
Racial Segregation
Residential Patterns
Science
Segregation
Sex Fairness
Sociology
Student Teacher Supervisors
Tenure
Universities
Urban Studies
Women
Work Environment
title Methods for Measuring Gender Diversity Among College and University Faculty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A55%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20for%20Measuring%20Gender%20Diversity%20Among%20College%20and%20University%20Faculty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20higher%20education%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Bohon,%20Stephanie%20A&rft.date=2019-10-15&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=28-39&rft.issn=2158-3595&rft.eissn=2158-3595&rft_id=info:doi/10.33423/jhetp.v19i6.2302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2310651946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c706-8f401249d566dc95d3d81de6259fad58f87e0fce728f6e8b567d64efed9d72023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310651946&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true