Loading…
Prevalence and patterns of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in male patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic Charcot’s neuroarthropathy: a cross-sectional study from South India
Aims Our study aimed to look at the prevalence and patterns of cardiac autonomic neuropathy related dysfunction in male patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic Charcot’s foot. Methods A total of 74 male patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were included in this study. Three groups of pat...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of diabetes in developing countries 2019-10, Vol.39 (4), p.633-640 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aims
Our study aimed to look at the prevalence and patterns of cardiac autonomic neuropathy related dysfunction in male patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic Charcot’s foot.
Methods
A total of 74 male patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were included in this study. Three groups of patients were selected: Group 1 included patients with chronic Charcot’s foot (
n
= 24), group 2 included patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy without chronic Charcot’s foot (
n
= 22) and group 3 included patients without peripheral neuropathy or chronic Charcot’s foot (
n
= 28). The autonomic functions were tested using a personal computer-based cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CANS-504) analyser.
Results
The combined sympathetic (SNS) and parasympathetic autonomic function (PNS) abnormalities were detected in about 70.8% in the chronic Charcot’s group, 55.6% in the peripheral neuropathy group and 35.7% in the non-neuropathic group. In patients with chronic Charcot’s foot (
n
= 24), 29.2% had normal, 20.8% had borderline and 50% had abnormal PNS functions, while 4.2% had normal, 16.7% had borderline and 79.2% had abnormal SNS functions. The Meary’s angle (183.18 ± 73.83 vs 157.98 ± 14.11;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0973-3930 1998-3832 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13410-019-00722-5 |