Loading…

Higher‐order and higher floating‐point precision numerical approximations of finite strain elasticity moduli

Summary Two real‐domain numerical approximation methods for accurate computation of finite strain elasticity moduli are developed and their accuracy and computational efficiency are investigated, with reference to hyperelastic constitutive models with known analytical solutions. The methods are high...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal for numerical methods in engineering 2019-12, Vol.120 (10), p.1184-1201
Main Authors: Connolly, Stephen John, Mackenzie, Donald, Gorash, Yevgen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-ab9795c7e8f58ad3c2523f06a33ef66aeada12c690a17f19b918b55dafae8c0b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-ab9795c7e8f58ad3c2523f06a33ef66aeada12c690a17f19b918b55dafae8c0b3
container_end_page 1201
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1184
container_title International journal for numerical methods in engineering
container_volume 120
creator Connolly, Stephen John
Mackenzie, Donald
Gorash, Yevgen
description Summary Two real‐domain numerical approximation methods for accurate computation of finite strain elasticity moduli are developed and their accuracy and computational efficiency are investigated, with reference to hyperelastic constitutive models with known analytical solutions. The methods are higher‐order and higher floating‐point precision numerical approximation, the latter being novel in this context. A general formula for higher‐order approximation finite difference schemes is derived and a new procedure is proposed to implement increased floating‐point precision. The accuracy of the approximated elasticity moduli is investigated numerically using higher‐order approximations in standard double precision and increased quadruple precision. It is found that, as the order of the approximation increases, the elasticity moduli tend toward the analytical solution. Using higher floating‐point precision, the approximated elasticity moduli for all orders of approximation are found to be more accurate than the standard double precision evaluation of the analytical moduli. Application of the techniques to a finite element problem shows that the numerically approximated methods obtain convergence equivalent to the analytical method but require greater computational effort. It is concluded that numerical approximation of elasticity moduli is a powerful and effective means of implementing advanced constitutive models in the finite element method without prior derivation of difficult analytical solutions.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nme.6176
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2313231431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2313231431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-ab9795c7e8f58ad3c2523f06a33ef66aeada12c690a17f19b918b55dafae8c0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqUgcQRLbNik2DH58RJVhSIV2MDamjh26yqxg50IsuMInJGT4LZsWYyeNO_T_DyELimZUULSG9uqWU6L_AhNKOFFQlJSHKNJtHiS8ZKeorMQtoRQmhE2Qd3SrDfK_3x9O18rj8HWeLNvYd046I1dR69zxva480qaYJzFdmiVNxIaDF3n3adpI-lswE5jbazpFQ69B2OxaiD0Rpp-xK2rh8acoxMNTVAXfzpFb_eL1_kyWb08PM7vVolknOUJVLzgmSxUqbMSaibTLGWa5MCY0nkOCmqgqcw5AVpoyitOyyrLatCgSkkqNkVXh7nxvvdBhV5s3eBtXClSRlms2yhTdH2gpHcheKVF5-MzfhSUiF2eIuYpdnlGNDmgH6ZR47-ceH5a7Plf1ch7nQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2313231431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Higher‐order and higher floating‐point precision numerical approximations of finite strain elasticity moduli</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Connolly, Stephen John ; Mackenzie, Donald ; Gorash, Yevgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Stephen John ; Mackenzie, Donald ; Gorash, Yevgen</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Two real‐domain numerical approximation methods for accurate computation of finite strain elasticity moduli are developed and their accuracy and computational efficiency are investigated, with reference to hyperelastic constitutive models with known analytical solutions. The methods are higher‐order and higher floating‐point precision numerical approximation, the latter being novel in this context. A general formula for higher‐order approximation finite difference schemes is derived and a new procedure is proposed to implement increased floating‐point precision. The accuracy of the approximated elasticity moduli is investigated numerically using higher‐order approximations in standard double precision and increased quadruple precision. It is found that, as the order of the approximation increases, the elasticity moduli tend toward the analytical solution. Using higher floating‐point precision, the approximated elasticity moduli for all orders of approximation are found to be more accurate than the standard double precision evaluation of the analytical moduli. Application of the techniques to a finite element problem shows that the numerically approximated methods obtain convergence equivalent to the analytical method but require greater computational effort. It is concluded that numerical approximation of elasticity moduli is a powerful and effective means of implementing advanced constitutive models in the finite element method without prior derivation of difficult analytical solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-5981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nme.6176</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Approximation ; Computational efficiency ; Constitutive models ; Elasticity ; elasticity moduli ; Exact solutions ; Finite difference method ; Finite element method ; higher floating‐point precision ; higher‐order approximation ; hyperelasticity ; Mathematical models ; nonlinear finite element method ; numerical differentiation ; Numerical methods ; Strain</subject><ispartof>International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 2019-12, Vol.120 (10), p.1184-1201</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-ab9795c7e8f58ad3c2523f06a33ef66aeada12c690a17f19b918b55dafae8c0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-ab9795c7e8f58ad3c2523f06a33ef66aeada12c690a17f19b918b55dafae8c0b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6286-0469 ; 0000-0003-2802-7814 ; 0000-0002-1824-1684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Stephen John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorash, Yevgen</creatorcontrib><title>Higher‐order and higher floating‐point precision numerical approximations of finite strain elasticity moduli</title><title>International journal for numerical methods in engineering</title><description>Summary Two real‐domain numerical approximation methods for accurate computation of finite strain elasticity moduli are developed and their accuracy and computational efficiency are investigated, with reference to hyperelastic constitutive models with known analytical solutions. The methods are higher‐order and higher floating‐point precision numerical approximation, the latter being novel in this context. A general formula for higher‐order approximation finite difference schemes is derived and a new procedure is proposed to implement increased floating‐point precision. The accuracy of the approximated elasticity moduli is investigated numerically using higher‐order approximations in standard double precision and increased quadruple precision. It is found that, as the order of the approximation increases, the elasticity moduli tend toward the analytical solution. Using higher floating‐point precision, the approximated elasticity moduli for all orders of approximation are found to be more accurate than the standard double precision evaluation of the analytical moduli. Application of the techniques to a finite element problem shows that the numerically approximated methods obtain convergence equivalent to the analytical method but require greater computational effort. It is concluded that numerical approximation of elasticity moduli is a powerful and effective means of implementing advanced constitutive models in the finite element method without prior derivation of difficult analytical solutions.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Computational efficiency</subject><subject>Constitutive models</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>elasticity moduli</subject><subject>Exact solutions</subject><subject>Finite difference method</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>higher floating‐point precision</subject><subject>higher‐order approximation</subject><subject>hyperelasticity</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>nonlinear finite element method</subject><subject>numerical differentiation</subject><subject>Numerical methods</subject><subject>Strain</subject><issn>0029-5981</issn><issn>1097-0207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqUgcQRLbNik2DH58RJVhSIV2MDamjh26yqxg50IsuMInJGT4LZsWYyeNO_T_DyELimZUULSG9uqWU6L_AhNKOFFQlJSHKNJtHiS8ZKeorMQtoRQmhE2Qd3SrDfK_3x9O18rj8HWeLNvYd046I1dR69zxva480qaYJzFdmiVNxIaDF3n3adpI-lswE5jbazpFQ69B2OxaiD0Rpp-xK2rh8acoxMNTVAXfzpFb_eL1_kyWb08PM7vVolknOUJVLzgmSxUqbMSaibTLGWa5MCY0nkOCmqgqcw5AVpoyitOyyrLatCgSkkqNkVXh7nxvvdBhV5s3eBtXClSRlms2yhTdH2gpHcheKVF5-MzfhSUiF2eIuYpdnlGNDmgH6ZR47-ceH5a7Plf1ch7nQ</recordid><startdate>20191207</startdate><enddate>20191207</enddate><creator>Connolly, Stephen John</creator><creator>Mackenzie, Donald</creator><creator>Gorash, Yevgen</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6286-0469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-7814</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1824-1684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191207</creationdate><title>Higher‐order and higher floating‐point precision numerical approximations of finite strain elasticity moduli</title><author>Connolly, Stephen John ; Mackenzie, Donald ; Gorash, Yevgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-ab9795c7e8f58ad3c2523f06a33ef66aeada12c690a17f19b918b55dafae8c0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Computational efficiency</topic><topic>Constitutive models</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>elasticity moduli</topic><topic>Exact solutions</topic><topic>Finite difference method</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>higher floating‐point precision</topic><topic>higher‐order approximation</topic><topic>hyperelasticity</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>nonlinear finite element method</topic><topic>numerical differentiation</topic><topic>Numerical methods</topic><topic>Strain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Stephen John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorash, Yevgen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Connolly, Stephen John</au><au>Mackenzie, Donald</au><au>Gorash, Yevgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Higher‐order and higher floating‐point precision numerical approximations of finite strain elasticity moduli</atitle><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in engineering</jtitle><date>2019-12-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1184</spage><epage>1201</epage><pages>1184-1201</pages><issn>0029-5981</issn><eissn>1097-0207</eissn><abstract>Summary Two real‐domain numerical approximation methods for accurate computation of finite strain elasticity moduli are developed and their accuracy and computational efficiency are investigated, with reference to hyperelastic constitutive models with known analytical solutions. The methods are higher‐order and higher floating‐point precision numerical approximation, the latter being novel in this context. A general formula for higher‐order approximation finite difference schemes is derived and a new procedure is proposed to implement increased floating‐point precision. The accuracy of the approximated elasticity moduli is investigated numerically using higher‐order approximations in standard double precision and increased quadruple precision. It is found that, as the order of the approximation increases, the elasticity moduli tend toward the analytical solution. Using higher floating‐point precision, the approximated elasticity moduli for all orders of approximation are found to be more accurate than the standard double precision evaluation of the analytical moduli. Application of the techniques to a finite element problem shows that the numerically approximated methods obtain convergence equivalent to the analytical method but require greater computational effort. It is concluded that numerical approximation of elasticity moduli is a powerful and effective means of implementing advanced constitutive models in the finite element method without prior derivation of difficult analytical solutions.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/nme.6176</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6286-0469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-7814</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1824-1684</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-5981
ispartof International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 2019-12, Vol.120 (10), p.1184-1201
issn 0029-5981
1097-0207
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2313231431
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects Accuracy
Approximation
Computational efficiency
Constitutive models
Elasticity
elasticity moduli
Exact solutions
Finite difference method
Finite element method
higher floating‐point precision
higher‐order approximation
hyperelasticity
Mathematical models
nonlinear finite element method
numerical differentiation
Numerical methods
Strain
title Higher‐order and higher floating‐point precision numerical approximations of finite strain elasticity moduli
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T00%3A51%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Higher%E2%80%90order%20and%20higher%20floating%E2%80%90point%20precision%20numerical%20approximations%20of%20finite%20strain%20elasticity%20moduli&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20numerical%20methods%20in%20engineering&rft.au=Connolly,%20Stephen%20John&rft.date=2019-12-07&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1184&rft.epage=1201&rft.pages=1184-1201&rft.issn=0029-5981&rft.eissn=1097-0207&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nme.6176&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2313231431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-ab9795c7e8f58ad3c2523f06a33ef66aeada12c690a17f19b918b55dafae8c0b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2313231431&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true