Loading…
Authors' reply
We thank readers for their interest in our editorial. The main purposes of the editorial were threefold: (i) to highlight the relatively recent identification and characterisation of a non-clinical psychosis population (for review see Kelleher & Cannon); (ii) to point out that there might be imp...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of psychiatry 2011-01, Vol.198 (1), p.75-75 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We thank readers for their interest in our editorial. The main purposes of the editorial were threefold: (i) to highlight the relatively recent identification and characterisation of a non-clinical psychosis population (for review see Kelleher & Cannon); (ii) to point out that there might be important overlap in the genetics of the clinical and non-clinical psychosis phenotypes; and (iii) to discuss the potential value of this population for empirically testing evolutionary theories of psychosis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1250 1472-1465 |
DOI: | 10.1192/bjp.198.1.75 |