Loading…
Some Features of Second Cohabiting Relationships
Conjugal and family trajectories have become more diverse since the early 1950s, partly due to increases in divorce and separation. Yet, few studies have focused specifically on second cohabiting relationships. This short paper uses data from the EPIC survey on individual and conjugal trajectories i...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Population (France) 2019-01, Vol.74 (1), p.149 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 149 |
| container_title | Population (France) |
| container_volume | 74 |
| creator | Costemalle, Vianney |
| description | Conjugal and family trajectories have become more diverse since the early 1950s, partly due to increases in divorce and separation. Yet, few studies have focused specifically on second cohabiting relationships. This short paper uses data from the EPIC survey on individual and conjugal trajectories in metropolitan France (Etude des parcours individuels et conjugaux, INED–INSEE, 2013–2014) to identify some of the main features of second couples. We do so by analysing the differences between the first and second partners’ characteristics and the stability of second unions, particularly as they relate to the respondents’ and their second partners’ family pasts. Usually, a respondent’s second partner is younger than their first, belongs to a different social category than the first, and has, like the respondent, already been in a union. Moreover, when both respondent and second partner have already had children separately, the risk of separation is greater, and the couple is less likely to have their own children. |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2317677348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2317677348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_23176773483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0OgjAUQOHGaCL-vEMTZ5KWQiszkTiLO6l6kRLsxd7y_jr4AE5n-M6CJbIsTGpKrZcsEUJlaa61WrMN0SBErmQhEyYafAGvwcY5AHHseAN39A9eYW9vLjr_5BcYbXToqXcT7diqsyPB_tctO9Sna3VOp4DvGSi2A87Bf6nNlDTaGJUf1X_XBzn8NF4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2317677348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some Features of Second Cohabiting Relationships</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Costemalle, Vianney</creator><creatorcontrib>Costemalle, Vianney</creatorcontrib><description>Conjugal and family trajectories have become more diverse since the early 1950s, partly due to increases in divorce and separation. Yet, few studies have focused specifically on second cohabiting relationships. This short paper uses data from the EPIC survey on individual and conjugal trajectories in metropolitan France (Etude des parcours individuels et conjugaux, INED–INSEE, 2013–2014) to identify some of the main features of second couples. We do so by analysing the differences between the first and second partners’ characteristics and the stability of second unions, particularly as they relate to the respondents’ and their second partners’ family pasts. Usually, a respondent’s second partner is younger than their first, belongs to a different social category than the first, and has, like the respondent, already been in a union. Moreover, when both respondent and second partner have already had children separately, the risk of separation is greater, and the couple is less likely to have their own children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-4663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1957-7966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Institut National d'études Démographiques</publisher><subject>Age differences ; Children ; Civil unions ; Cohabitation ; Couples ; Divorce ; Educational attainment ; Families & family life ; Fertility ; Marital disruption ; Marital separation ; Population ; Respondents ; Separation ; Sociology ; Trajectories ; Women</subject><ispartof>Population (France), 2019-01, Vol.74 (1), p.149</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institut National d'études Démographiques 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,27344,33223,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costemalle, Vianney</creatorcontrib><title>Some Features of Second Cohabiting Relationships</title><title>Population (France)</title><description>Conjugal and family trajectories have become more diverse since the early 1950s, partly due to increases in divorce and separation. Yet, few studies have focused specifically on second cohabiting relationships. This short paper uses data from the EPIC survey on individual and conjugal trajectories in metropolitan France (Etude des parcours individuels et conjugaux, INED–INSEE, 2013–2014) to identify some of the main features of second couples. We do so by analysing the differences between the first and second partners’ characteristics and the stability of second unions, particularly as they relate to the respondents’ and their second partners’ family pasts. Usually, a respondent’s second partner is younger than their first, belongs to a different social category than the first, and has, like the respondent, already been in a union. Moreover, when both respondent and second partner have already had children separately, the risk of separation is greater, and the couple is less likely to have their own children.</description><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Civil unions</subject><subject>Cohabitation</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Marital disruption</subject><subject>Marital separation</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Trajectories</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0032-4663</issn><issn>1957-7966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyr0OgjAUQOHGaCL-vEMTZ5KWQiszkTiLO6l6kRLsxd7y_jr4AE5n-M6CJbIsTGpKrZcsEUJlaa61WrMN0SBErmQhEyYafAGvwcY5AHHseAN39A9eYW9vLjr_5BcYbXToqXcT7diqsyPB_tctO9Sna3VOp4DvGSi2A87Bf6nNlDTaGJUf1X_XBzn8NF4</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Costemalle, Vianney</creator><general>Institut National d'études Démographiques</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Some Features of Second Cohabiting Relationships</title><author>Costemalle, Vianney</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_23176773483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Civil unions</topic><topic>Cohabitation</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Marital disruption</topic><topic>Marital separation</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Trajectories</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costemalle, Vianney</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Population (France)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costemalle, Vianney</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some Features of Second Cohabiting Relationships</atitle><jtitle>Population (France)</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>149</spage><pages>149-</pages><issn>0032-4663</issn><eissn>1957-7966</eissn><abstract>Conjugal and family trajectories have become more diverse since the early 1950s, partly due to increases in divorce and separation. Yet, few studies have focused specifically on second cohabiting relationships. This short paper uses data from the EPIC survey on individual and conjugal trajectories in metropolitan France (Etude des parcours individuels et conjugaux, INED–INSEE, 2013–2014) to identify some of the main features of second couples. We do so by analysing the differences between the first and second partners’ characteristics and the stability of second unions, particularly as they relate to the respondents’ and their second partners’ family pasts. Usually, a respondent’s second partner is younger than their first, belongs to a different social category than the first, and has, like the respondent, already been in a union. Moreover, when both respondent and second partner have already had children separately, the risk of separation is greater, and the couple is less likely to have their own children.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Institut National d'études Démographiques</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0032-4663 |
| ispartof | Population (France), 2019-01, Vol.74 (1), p.149 |
| issn | 0032-4663 1957-7966 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2317677348 |
| source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Age differences Children Civil unions Cohabitation Couples Divorce Educational attainment Families & family life Fertility Marital disruption Marital separation Population Respondents Separation Sociology Trajectories Women |
| title | Some Features of Second Cohabiting Relationships |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A18%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20Features%20of%20Second%20Cohabiting%20Relationships&rft.jtitle=Population%20(France)&rft.au=Costemalle,%20Vianney&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=149&rft.pages=149-&rft.issn=0032-4663&rft.eissn=1957-7966&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2317677348%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_23176773483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2317677348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |