Non‐destructive DNA extractions from fly larvae (Diptera: Muscidae) enable molecular identification of species and enhance morphological features

Insects preserved as reference specimens are important in a wide range of fields, including health, pest management and forensics. The aim of the present study was to test a non‐destructive DNA extraction method on samples of soft‐bodied insects, fly larvae, which are otherwise hard to identify morp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Austral entomology 2019-11, Vol.58 (4), p.848-856
Main Authors: Martoni, Francesco, Valenzuela, Isabel, Blacket, Mark J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal morphology
Australia
barcoding
biosecurity
COI
Collections
Colour
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Destructive testing
DNA
DNA barcoding
Feature extraction
forensic entomology
Forensic science
Gene sequencing
Hooks
Identification
Insects
Larvae
Morphology
Muscidae
Museums
Nucleotide sequence
Pest control
Segmentation
Spiracles
surveillance
taxonomy
Visibility
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Insects preserved as reference specimens are important in a wide range of fields, including health, pest management and forensics. The aim of the present study was to test a non‐destructive DNA extraction method on samples of soft‐bodied insects, fly larvae, which are otherwise hard to identify morphologically. This not only provides DNA enabling molecular identification but also retains morphological reference specimens for samples belonging to collections and museums that cannot be destroyed. In this work, fly larvae identified as belonging to the family Muscidae were non‐destructively processed. DNA barcoding molecular identification allowed most of these specimens to be assigned to species. Furthermore, the visibility of seven important larval morphological characters – anterior and posterior spiracles, mouth hooks, cephalopharyngeal skeleton, locomotory welts, segmentation and colour – was assessed pre‐ and post‐DNA extraction. It was found that the morphology generally did not deteriorate post‐DNA extraction but actually improved through increased visibility of internal features. Therefore, this non‐destructive DNA extraction method not only allowed COI barcode sequences to be obtained, but also enabled a better morphological identification of the fly larvae retaining physical reference voucher specimens and avoiding the need for dissections.
ISSN:2052-174X
2052-1758
DOI:10.1111/aen.12419