Loading…
Osteoporotic pedicle screw: Review of various types of pedicle screw and cement augmentation
Osteoporosis is a major global health problem and its complication especially compression fracture of the spine has become a burden of physical function in postmenopausal women and elderly. Screw loosening and pulling out are still major issues in pedicle screw placement in osteoporotic bone. Variou...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-a18b2931d8cab825956bc56738ee898add753cfb272da8c3c30938d9031ef7dd3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 2193 |
creator | Rahyussalim, Ahmad Jabir Kurniawati, Tri Besri, Nanda Notario Hukmi, Khairul |
description | Osteoporosis is a major global health problem and its complication especially compression fracture of the spine has become a burden of physical function in postmenopausal women and elderly. Screw loosening and pulling out are still major issues in pedicle screw placement in osteoporotic bone. Various studies about pedicle screw have been investigated. Pedicle screw using expandable pedicle screw (EPS), cannulated pedicle and fenestrated pedicle screw with cement augmentation, and anchor type of pedicle screw show excellent outcomes in biomechanical studies (pull-out, insertional torque), micro-CT analysis, and histological analysis compared to conventional solid pedicle screw. There is no study comparing each type of these screws. PMMA cement augmentation is superior to cement-based augmentation, but it shows more complication than calcium based-cement. Hydroxyapatite (HA) have shown better pull-out force six times higher than solid screw without augmentation, but there is no comparative study between PMMA and HA. This work aims to investigate various types of pedicle screw and cement augmentation used in osteoporotic bone. It has been shown that fenestrated and cannulated pedicle screw with cement augmentation, expandable pedicle screw, and anchor type pedicle screw with various type of augmentation shows benefit in osteoporotic bone screw placement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.5139323 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2323224707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2323224707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-a18b2931d8cab825956bc56738ee898add753cfb272da8c3c30938d9031ef7dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWKsL_yDgTpia5DWTxJ0Uq0KhIAouhJBJMpLSTsZkpqV_b0sL4sbVhcvhvctB6JqSESUl3NERp6CAwQkaUM5pIUpanqIBIWpcsDF8nKOLnBeEMCWEHKDPee58bGOKXbC49S7YpcfZJr-5x69-HfwGxxqvTQqxz7jbtj7viz8kNo3D1q9802HTf-3TdCE2l-isNsvsr445RO_Tx7fJczGbP71MHmaFBSa7wlBZMQXUSWsqybjiZWV5KUB6L5U0zgkOtq6YYM5ICxaIAukUAepr4RwM0c3hbpvid-9zpxexT83upWY7FYyNBRE76vZAZRsO-3SbwsqkraZE7-1pqo_2_oPXMf2CunU1_ACx33Eg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2323224707</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Osteoporotic pedicle screw: Review of various types of pedicle screw and cement augmentation</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Rahyussalim, Ahmad Jabir ; Kurniawati, Tri ; Besri, Nanda Notario ; Hukmi, Khairul</creator><contributor>Gozan, Misri ; Abuzairi, Tomy ; Rahman, Siti Fauziyah ; Lischer, Kenny</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rahyussalim, Ahmad Jabir ; Kurniawati, Tri ; Besri, Nanda Notario ; Hukmi, Khairul ; Gozan, Misri ; Abuzairi, Tomy ; Rahman, Siti Fauziyah ; Lischer, Kenny</creatorcontrib><description>Osteoporosis is a major global health problem and its complication especially compression fracture of the spine has become a burden of physical function in postmenopausal women and elderly. Screw loosening and pulling out are still major issues in pedicle screw placement in osteoporotic bone. Various studies about pedicle screw have been investigated. Pedicle screw using expandable pedicle screw (EPS), cannulated pedicle and fenestrated pedicle screw with cement augmentation, and anchor type of pedicle screw show excellent outcomes in biomechanical studies (pull-out, insertional torque), micro-CT analysis, and histological analysis compared to conventional solid pedicle screw. There is no study comparing each type of these screws. PMMA cement augmentation is superior to cement-based augmentation, but it shows more complication than calcium based-cement. Hydroxyapatite (HA) have shown better pull-out force six times higher than solid screw without augmentation, but there is no comparative study between PMMA and HA. This work aims to investigate various types of pedicle screw and cement augmentation used in osteoporotic bone. It has been shown that fenestrated and cannulated pedicle screw with cement augmentation, expandable pedicle screw, and anchor type pedicle screw with various type of augmentation shows benefit in osteoporotic bone screw placement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.5139323</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Anchors ; Augmentation ; Biomechanical engineering ; Biomechanics ; Biomedical materials ; Cement ; Comparative studies ; Hydroxyapatite ; Loosening ; Osteoporosis ; Pedicle screws ; Polymethyl methacrylate</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2019, Vol.2193 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2019 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-a18b2931d8cab825956bc56738ee898add753cfb272da8c3c30938d9031ef7dd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Gozan, Misri</contributor><contributor>Abuzairi, Tomy</contributor><contributor>Rahman, Siti Fauziyah</contributor><contributor>Lischer, Kenny</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rahyussalim, Ahmad Jabir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurniawati, Tri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besri, Nanda Notario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hukmi, Khairul</creatorcontrib><title>Osteoporotic pedicle screw: Review of various types of pedicle screw and cement augmentation</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>Osteoporosis is a major global health problem and its complication especially compression fracture of the spine has become a burden of physical function in postmenopausal women and elderly. Screw loosening and pulling out are still major issues in pedicle screw placement in osteoporotic bone. Various studies about pedicle screw have been investigated. Pedicle screw using expandable pedicle screw (EPS), cannulated pedicle and fenestrated pedicle screw with cement augmentation, and anchor type of pedicle screw show excellent outcomes in biomechanical studies (pull-out, insertional torque), micro-CT analysis, and histological analysis compared to conventional solid pedicle screw. There is no study comparing each type of these screws. PMMA cement augmentation is superior to cement-based augmentation, but it shows more complication than calcium based-cement. Hydroxyapatite (HA) have shown better pull-out force six times higher than solid screw without augmentation, but there is no comparative study between PMMA and HA. This work aims to investigate various types of pedicle screw and cement augmentation used in osteoporotic bone. It has been shown that fenestrated and cannulated pedicle screw with cement augmentation, expandable pedicle screw, and anchor type pedicle screw with various type of augmentation shows benefit in osteoporotic bone screw placement.</description><subject>Anchors</subject><subject>Augmentation</subject><subject>Biomechanical engineering</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Loosening</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Pedicle screws</subject><subject>Polymethyl methacrylate</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWKsL_yDgTpia5DWTxJ0Uq0KhIAouhJBJMpLSTsZkpqV_b0sL4sbVhcvhvctB6JqSESUl3NERp6CAwQkaUM5pIUpanqIBIWpcsDF8nKOLnBeEMCWEHKDPee58bGOKXbC49S7YpcfZJr-5x69-HfwGxxqvTQqxz7jbtj7viz8kNo3D1q9802HTf-3TdCE2l-isNsvsr445RO_Tx7fJczGbP71MHmaFBSa7wlBZMQXUSWsqybjiZWV5KUB6L5U0zgkOtq6YYM5ICxaIAukUAepr4RwM0c3hbpvid-9zpxexT83upWY7FYyNBRE76vZAZRsO-3SbwsqkraZE7-1pqo_2_oPXMf2CunU1_ACx33Eg</recordid><startdate>20191210</startdate><enddate>20191210</enddate><creator>Rahyussalim, Ahmad Jabir</creator><creator>Kurniawati, Tri</creator><creator>Besri, Nanda Notario</creator><creator>Hukmi, Khairul</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191210</creationdate><title>Osteoporotic pedicle screw: Review of various types of pedicle screw and cement augmentation</title><author>Rahyussalim, Ahmad Jabir ; Kurniawati, Tri ; Besri, Nanda Notario ; Hukmi, Khairul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-a18b2931d8cab825956bc56738ee898add753cfb272da8c3c30938d9031ef7dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anchors</topic><topic>Augmentation</topic><topic>Biomechanical engineering</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Loosening</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Pedicle screws</topic><topic>Polymethyl methacrylate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahyussalim, Ahmad Jabir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurniawati, Tri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besri, Nanda Notario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hukmi, Khairul</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahyussalim, Ahmad Jabir</au><au>Kurniawati, Tri</au><au>Besri, Nanda Notario</au><au>Hukmi, Khairul</au><au>Gozan, Misri</au><au>Abuzairi, Tomy</au><au>Rahman, Siti Fauziyah</au><au>Lischer, Kenny</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Osteoporotic pedicle screw: Review of various types of pedicle screw and cement augmentation</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2019-12-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2193</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>Osteoporosis is a major global health problem and its complication especially compression fracture of the spine has become a burden of physical function in postmenopausal women and elderly. Screw loosening and pulling out are still major issues in pedicle screw placement in osteoporotic bone. Various studies about pedicle screw have been investigated. Pedicle screw using expandable pedicle screw (EPS), cannulated pedicle and fenestrated pedicle screw with cement augmentation, and anchor type of pedicle screw show excellent outcomes in biomechanical studies (pull-out, insertional torque), micro-CT analysis, and histological analysis compared to conventional solid pedicle screw. There is no study comparing each type of these screws. PMMA cement augmentation is superior to cement-based augmentation, but it shows more complication than calcium based-cement. Hydroxyapatite (HA) have shown better pull-out force six times higher than solid screw without augmentation, but there is no comparative study between PMMA and HA. This work aims to investigate various types of pedicle screw and cement augmentation used in osteoporotic bone. It has been shown that fenestrated and cannulated pedicle screw with cement augmentation, expandable pedicle screw, and anchor type pedicle screw with various type of augmentation shows benefit in osteoporotic bone screw placement.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.5139323</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
ispartof | AIP conference proceedings, 2019, Vol.2193 (1) |
issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2323224707 |
source | American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list) |
subjects | Anchors Augmentation Biomechanical engineering Biomechanics Biomedical materials Cement Comparative studies Hydroxyapatite Loosening Osteoporosis Pedicle screws Polymethyl methacrylate |
title | Osteoporotic pedicle screw: Review of various types of pedicle screw and cement augmentation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A22%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Osteoporotic%20pedicle%20screw:%20Review%20of%20various%20types%20of%20pedicle%20screw%20and%20cement%20augmentation&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Rahyussalim,%20Ahmad%20Jabir&rft.date=2019-12-10&rft.volume=2193&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.5139323&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2323224707%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-a18b2931d8cab825956bc56738ee898add753cfb272da8c3c30938d9031ef7dd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2323224707&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |