Tweeting for peace: Experimental evidence from the 2016 Colombian Plebiscite

The decades-long Colombian civil war nearly came to an official end with the 2016 Peace Plebiscite, which was ultimately defeated in a narrow vote. This conflict has deeply divided Colombian civil society, and non-political public figures have played a crucial role in structuring debate on the topic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Electoral studies 2019-12, Vol.62, p.102072, Article 102072
Main Authors: Gallego, Jorge, Martínez, Juan D., Munger, Kevin, Vásquez-Cortés, Mateo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Attitudes
Civil society
Civil war
Identity
Influence
Peace
Public figures
Referendums
Sampling
Voting
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The decades-long Colombian civil war nearly came to an official end with the 2016 Peace Plebiscite, which was ultimately defeated in a narrow vote. This conflict has deeply divided Colombian civil society, and non-political public figures have played a crucial role in structuring debate on the topic. To understand the mechanisms underlying the influence of members of civil society on political discussion, we performed a randomized experiment on Colombian Twitter users shortly before this election. Sampling from a pool of subjects who had been frequently tweeting about the Plebiscite, we tweeted messages that encouraged subjects to consider different aspects of the decision. We varied the identity (a general, a scientist, and a priest) of the accounts we used and the content of the messages we sent. We found little evidence that any of our interventions were successful in persuading subjects to change their attitudes. However, we show that our pro-Peace messages encouraged liberal Colombians to engage in significantly more public deliberation on the subject.
ISSN:0261-3794
1873-6890
DOI:10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102072