Comparing domain- and facet-level relations of the HEXACO personality model with workplace deviance: A meta-analysis

Personality research suggests that the prediction of organizational behavior can be improved by examining the criterion-related validity of narrow personality facets. In the current study, we provide meta-analytic effect size estimates (k = 29) for the relations of all HEXACO domains and facets with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personality and individual differences 2020-01, Vol.152, p.109539, Article 109539
Main Authors: Pletzer, Jan Luca, Oostrom, Janneke K., Bentvelzen, Margriet, de Vries, Reinout E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavior
Counterproductive work behavior
Deviance
Domains
Facets
HEXACO
Honesty
Masking
Meta-analysis
Openness
Organizational behavior
Personality
Personality tests
Workplace deviance
Workplaces
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Personality research suggests that the prediction of organizational behavior can be improved by examining the criterion-related validity of narrow personality facets. In the current study, we provide meta-analytic effect size estimates (k = 29) for the relations of all HEXACO domains and facets with workplace deviance and re-analyze available data (k = 9) to compare the criterion-related validity of the HEXACO domains with that of their constituent facets. Findings provided evidence for a masking effect among the facets of Honesty-Humility and a cancellation effect among the facets of Openness to Experience. Furthermore, facets generally outperformed domains in predicting workplace deviance. This was most notable for the Fairness facet, which explained almost as much variance in workplace deviance as all six HEXACO domains combined. These results suggest that using a few HEXACO facets to predict workplace deviance can be more efficient than using all six broad domains.
ISSN:0191-8869
1873-3549
DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109539