Loading…

Spatial Variability in Size Structure, Growth, and Recruitment of Spotted Seatrout among Six Florida Estuaries

Spotted Seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus in Florida, USA, are managed under four geographical regions, including Apalachicola Bay and Cedar Key (northwest region), Tampa Bay and Charlotte Harbor (southwest region), northeast Florida (northeast region), and the northern Indian River Lagoon (southeast reg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine and coastal fisheries 2019-02, Vol.11 (1), p.97-111
Main Authors: Herdter, Elizabeth, Mahmoudi, Behzad, Peebles, Ernst, Murawski, Steven A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3373-6851609446eb1088381b13f9ed3207b961d6ce3a0a46606692e026600bc53f843
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3373-6851609446eb1088381b13f9ed3207b961d6ce3a0a46606692e026600bc53f843
container_end_page 111
container_issue 1
container_start_page 97
container_title Marine and coastal fisheries
container_volume 11
creator Herdter, Elizabeth
Mahmoudi, Behzad
Peebles, Ernst
Murawski, Steven A.
description Spotted Seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus in Florida, USA, are managed under four geographical regions, including Apalachicola Bay and Cedar Key (northwest region), Tampa Bay and Charlotte Harbor (southwest region), northeast Florida (northeast region), and the northern Indian River Lagoon (southeast region). Two of these management regions are composed of more than one major estuary system (northwest and southwest regions). However, previous life history research suggests that the management regions do not accurately reflect the unique biological populations of Spotted Seatrout in Florida. Our objective was to determine (1) whether there is significant spatial variation in size structure, the age–length relationship, and recruitment patterns among populations of Spotted Seatrout in Florida; and (2) whether there is agreement in these life history parameters among estuary populations comprising individual management regions. We used long‐term fishery‐independent and fishery‐dependent data sets on recruitment, age, and size structure among six estuaries and the four management regions. Young‐of‐the‐year recruitment patterns and the length‐at‐age relationship over all ages differed significantly among estuarine populations and within management regions. Additionally, all estuaries differed significantly in length distributions of Spotted Seatrout caught by the recreational fishery. Our results highlight the need to understand the relative contributions of estuary‐specific data to regional assessment models if the four‐region boundary scheme for Florida is continued. Moreover, as variation in growth and recruitment among estuaries likely reflects estuary‐specific environmental conditions, we suggest that environmental variables be considered in future assessments and management of this recreationally valuable species.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mcf2.10063
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2329758300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2329758300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3373-6851609446eb1088381b13f9ed3207b961d6ce3a0a46606692e026600bc53f843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqWw8AsssaEG_JG48YgqWpCKkAiwWk7yAq6SONiOSvn1pISBiemd4dz7pIvQOSVXlBB23RQV25PgB2hCZcyihDJy-IeP0Yn3m8GIpeQT1GadDkbX-FU7o3NTm7DDpsWZ-QKcBdcXoXcwwytnt-F9hnVb4icoXG9CA23AtsJZZ0OAEmegg7N9wLqx7dvQ8ImXtXWm1PjWh37oB3-Kjipdezj7vVP0srx9XtxF68fV_eJmHRWcz3kk0oQKIuNYQE5JmvKU5pRXEkrOyDyXgpaiAK6JjoUgQkgGhA1E8iLhVRrzKboYeztnP3rwQW1s79rhpWKcyXmSckIG63K0Cme9d1CpzplGu52iRO33VPs91c-eg0xHeWtq2P1jqofFko2ZbyK_dh0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329758300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial Variability in Size Structure, Growth, and Recruitment of Spotted Seatrout among Six Florida Estuaries</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)</source><creator>Herdter, Elizabeth ; Mahmoudi, Behzad ; Peebles, Ernst ; Murawski, Steven A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Herdter, Elizabeth ; Mahmoudi, Behzad ; Peebles, Ernst ; Murawski, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><description>Spotted Seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus in Florida, USA, are managed under four geographical regions, including Apalachicola Bay and Cedar Key (northwest region), Tampa Bay and Charlotte Harbor (southwest region), northeast Florida (northeast region), and the northern Indian River Lagoon (southeast region). Two of these management regions are composed of more than one major estuary system (northwest and southwest regions). However, previous life history research suggests that the management regions do not accurately reflect the unique biological populations of Spotted Seatrout in Florida. Our objective was to determine (1) whether there is significant spatial variation in size structure, the age–length relationship, and recruitment patterns among populations of Spotted Seatrout in Florida; and (2) whether there is agreement in these life history parameters among estuary populations comprising individual management regions. We used long‐term fishery‐independent and fishery‐dependent data sets on recruitment, age, and size structure among six estuaries and the four management regions. Young‐of‐the‐year recruitment patterns and the length‐at‐age relationship over all ages differed significantly among estuarine populations and within management regions. Additionally, all estuaries differed significantly in length distributions of Spotted Seatrout caught by the recreational fishery. Our results highlight the need to understand the relative contributions of estuary‐specific data to regional assessment models if the four‐region boundary scheme for Florida is continued. Moreover, as variation in growth and recruitment among estuaries likely reflects estuary‐specific environmental conditions, we suggest that environmental variables be considered in future assessments and management of this recreationally valuable species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-5120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-5120</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mcf2.10063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Age composition ; Brackishwater environment ; Catch per unit effort ; Commercial fishing ; Environmental conditions ; Estuaries ; Estuarine dynamics ; Fish ; Fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Fishery data ; Fishing ; Growth curves ; Lagoons ; Life history ; Recreation ; Recruitment ; Recruitment (fisheries) ; Regions ; Rivers ; Spatial variations ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Marine and coastal fisheries, 2019-02, Vol.11 (1), p.97-111</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. Marine and Coastal Fisheries published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Fisheries Society.</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3373-6851609446eb1088381b13f9ed3207b961d6ce3a0a46606692e026600bc53f843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3373-6851609446eb1088381b13f9ed3207b961d6ce3a0a46606692e026600bc53f843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4295-2953</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2329758300/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2329758300?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11560,25751,27922,27923,37010,44588,46050,46474,74896</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herdter, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoudi, Behzad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peebles, Ernst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murawski, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial Variability in Size Structure, Growth, and Recruitment of Spotted Seatrout among Six Florida Estuaries</title><title>Marine and coastal fisheries</title><description>Spotted Seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus in Florida, USA, are managed under four geographical regions, including Apalachicola Bay and Cedar Key (northwest region), Tampa Bay and Charlotte Harbor (southwest region), northeast Florida (northeast region), and the northern Indian River Lagoon (southeast region). Two of these management regions are composed of more than one major estuary system (northwest and southwest regions). However, previous life history research suggests that the management regions do not accurately reflect the unique biological populations of Spotted Seatrout in Florida. Our objective was to determine (1) whether there is significant spatial variation in size structure, the age–length relationship, and recruitment patterns among populations of Spotted Seatrout in Florida; and (2) whether there is agreement in these life history parameters among estuary populations comprising individual management regions. We used long‐term fishery‐independent and fishery‐dependent data sets on recruitment, age, and size structure among six estuaries and the four management regions. Young‐of‐the‐year recruitment patterns and the length‐at‐age relationship over all ages differed significantly among estuarine populations and within management regions. Additionally, all estuaries differed significantly in length distributions of Spotted Seatrout caught by the recreational fishery. Our results highlight the need to understand the relative contributions of estuary‐specific data to regional assessment models if the four‐region boundary scheme for Florida is continued. Moreover, as variation in growth and recruitment among estuaries likely reflects estuary‐specific environmental conditions, we suggest that environmental variables be considered in future assessments and management of this recreationally valuable species.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age composition</subject><subject>Brackishwater environment</subject><subject>Catch per unit effort</subject><subject>Commercial fishing</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Estuarine dynamics</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishery data</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Growth curves</subject><subject>Lagoons</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Recruitment (fisheries)</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1942-5120</issn><issn>1942-5120</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqWw8AsssaEG_JG48YgqWpCKkAiwWk7yAq6SONiOSvn1pISBiemd4dz7pIvQOSVXlBB23RQV25PgB2hCZcyihDJy-IeP0Yn3m8GIpeQT1GadDkbX-FU7o3NTm7DDpsWZ-QKcBdcXoXcwwytnt-F9hnVb4icoXG9CA23AtsJZZ0OAEmegg7N9wLqx7dvQ8ImXtXWm1PjWh37oB3-Kjipdezj7vVP0srx9XtxF68fV_eJmHRWcz3kk0oQKIuNYQE5JmvKU5pRXEkrOyDyXgpaiAK6JjoUgQkgGhA1E8iLhVRrzKboYeztnP3rwQW1s79rhpWKcyXmSckIG63K0Cme9d1CpzplGu52iRO33VPs91c-eg0xHeWtq2P1jqofFko2ZbyK_dh0</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Herdter, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Mahmoudi, Behzad</creator><creator>Peebles, Ernst</creator><creator>Murawski, Steven A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4295-2953</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Spatial Variability in Size Structure, Growth, and Recruitment of Spotted Seatrout among Six Florida Estuaries</title><author>Herdter, Elizabeth ; Mahmoudi, Behzad ; Peebles, Ernst ; Murawski, Steven A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3373-6851609446eb1088381b13f9ed3207b961d6ce3a0a46606692e026600bc53f843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age composition</topic><topic>Brackishwater environment</topic><topic>Catch per unit effort</topic><topic>Commercial fishing</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Estuarine dynamics</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishery data</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Growth curves</topic><topic>Lagoons</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Recruitment (fisheries)</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herdter, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoudi, Behzad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peebles, Ernst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murawski, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Marine and coastal fisheries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herdter, Elizabeth</au><au>Mahmoudi, Behzad</au><au>Peebles, Ernst</au><au>Murawski, Steven A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial Variability in Size Structure, Growth, and Recruitment of Spotted Seatrout among Six Florida Estuaries</atitle><jtitle>Marine and coastal fisheries</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>97-111</pages><issn>1942-5120</issn><eissn>1942-5120</eissn><abstract>Spotted Seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus in Florida, USA, are managed under four geographical regions, including Apalachicola Bay and Cedar Key (northwest region), Tampa Bay and Charlotte Harbor (southwest region), northeast Florida (northeast region), and the northern Indian River Lagoon (southeast region). Two of these management regions are composed of more than one major estuary system (northwest and southwest regions). However, previous life history research suggests that the management regions do not accurately reflect the unique biological populations of Spotted Seatrout in Florida. Our objective was to determine (1) whether there is significant spatial variation in size structure, the age–length relationship, and recruitment patterns among populations of Spotted Seatrout in Florida; and (2) whether there is agreement in these life history parameters among estuary populations comprising individual management regions. We used long‐term fishery‐independent and fishery‐dependent data sets on recruitment, age, and size structure among six estuaries and the four management regions. Young‐of‐the‐year recruitment patterns and the length‐at‐age relationship over all ages differed significantly among estuarine populations and within management regions. Additionally, all estuaries differed significantly in length distributions of Spotted Seatrout caught by the recreational fishery. Our results highlight the need to understand the relative contributions of estuary‐specific data to regional assessment models if the four‐region boundary scheme for Florida is continued. Moreover, as variation in growth and recruitment among estuaries likely reflects estuary‐specific environmental conditions, we suggest that environmental variables be considered in future assessments and management of this recreationally valuable species.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/mcf2.10063</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4295-2953</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-5120
ispartof Marine and coastal fisheries, 2019-02, Vol.11 (1), p.97-111
issn 1942-5120
1942-5120
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2329758300
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection; Publicly Available Content Database; Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)
subjects Age
Age composition
Brackishwater environment
Catch per unit effort
Commercial fishing
Environmental conditions
Estuaries
Estuarine dynamics
Fish
Fisheries
Fisheries management
Fishery data
Fishing
Growth curves
Lagoons
Life history
Recreation
Recruitment
Recruitment (fisheries)
Regions
Rivers
Spatial variations
Wildlife conservation
title Spatial Variability in Size Structure, Growth, and Recruitment of Spotted Seatrout among Six Florida Estuaries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A59%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20Variability%20in%20Size%20Structure,%20Growth,%20and%20Recruitment%20of%20Spotted%20Seatrout%20among%20Six%20Florida%20Estuaries&rft.jtitle=Marine%20and%20coastal%20fisheries&rft.au=Herdter,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=97-111&rft.issn=1942-5120&rft.eissn=1942-5120&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mcf2.10063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2329758300%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3373-6851609446eb1088381b13f9ed3207b961d6ce3a0a46606692e026600bc53f843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329758300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true