Loading…

Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading

This paper reports results of full scale testing to further explore potential GCL damage mechanisms in earth dam retrofit applications in seismically active areas; in particular, to a) investigate whether shear displacements could reduce the magnitude of GCL panel overlap during earthquake shaking;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geotextiles and geomembranes 2019-08, Vol.47 (4), p.502-513
Main Authors: Sawada, Yutaka, Nakazawa, Hiroshi, Take, W. Andy, Kawabata, Toshinori
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493
container_end_page 513
container_issue 4
container_start_page 502
container_title Geotextiles and geomembranes
container_volume 47
creator Sawada, Yutaka
Nakazawa, Hiroshi
Take, W. Andy
Kawabata, Toshinori
description This paper reports results of full scale testing to further explore potential GCL damage mechanisms in earth dam retrofit applications in seismically active areas; in particular, to a) investigate whether shear displacements could reduce the magnitude of GCL panel overlap during earthquake shaking; b) explore the influence of gravel particles on GCL thickness at localised point of contact; and c) observe the consequences of an accidental exposure of an uncovered GCL to short duration rainfall in terms of moisture content and effects during subsequent compaction. The results of these experiments indicate that even under severe shaking no movements were detected at the GCL panel overlap. Whereas gravel particles were observed to locally reduce the thickness of the GCL to 2.2 mm, no plowing of the particle into the GCL occurred due to a lack of shear displacement at the interface, resulting in no localised internal erosion through the barrier. Furthermore, hydration of GCL panels during construction due to surface wetting was observed to result in a state of hydration less than its post-construction state. These results indicate that although each of the three GCL damage mechanisms cannot be ruled out to ever be relevant in practice, the performance of the GCL retrofitted earth dam tested was satisfactory under even severe Level 2 earthquake shaking, and suggests that the retrofitting of small earth dams with GCLs is a promising strategy to improve their static and seismic resistance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.03.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2330020953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266114419300366</els_id><sourcerecordid>2330020953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDVhinTC281xWFS1IldjA2nLiSeqSxK2dVPD3uBSxZTWbc-_oHkLuGcQMWPa4i1u0I3722MccWBmDiAHYBZmxIi8jkRbJJZkBz7KIsSS5Jjfe7wAgyctiRvxq6jrqa9UhNcMR_WhaNRo7UNvQ9XJDtepVi7THeqsG43sfMOp7FVKo3Lg9AdTh6GxjRqr2-87UPwWeToNGd6YOk_pA2lmlzdDekqtGdR7vfu-cvK-e3pbP0eZ1_bJcbKI6BT5GFS8EFDrVkOtw8jRLkOtKpKUIO4tCs4RrDlWasbICzqo0T8pGNcgUNFlSijl5OPfunT1MYZrc2ckN4aXkQgBwKFMRqPxM1c5677CRe2d65b4kA3kyLHfyz7A8GZYgZDAckotzEsOIo0EnfW1wqFEbh_UotTX_dnwDRo2Jtw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2330020953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Sawada, Yutaka ; Nakazawa, Hiroshi ; Take, W. Andy ; Kawabata, Toshinori</creator><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Yutaka ; Nakazawa, Hiroshi ; Take, W. Andy ; Kawabata, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports results of full scale testing to further explore potential GCL damage mechanisms in earth dam retrofit applications in seismically active areas; in particular, to a) investigate whether shear displacements could reduce the magnitude of GCL panel overlap during earthquake shaking; b) explore the influence of gravel particles on GCL thickness at localised point of contact; and c) observe the consequences of an accidental exposure of an uncovered GCL to short duration rainfall in terms of moisture content and effects during subsequent compaction. The results of these experiments indicate that even under severe shaking no movements were detected at the GCL panel overlap. Whereas gravel particles were observed to locally reduce the thickness of the GCL to 2.2 mm, no plowing of the particle into the GCL occurred due to a lack of shear displacement at the interface, resulting in no localised internal erosion through the barrier. Furthermore, hydration of GCL panels during construction due to surface wetting was observed to result in a state of hydration less than its post-construction state. These results indicate that although each of the three GCL damage mechanisms cannot be ruled out to ever be relevant in practice, the performance of the GCL retrofitted earth dam tested was satisfactory under even severe Level 2 earthquake shaking, and suggests that the retrofitting of small earth dams with GCLs is a promising strategy to improve their static and seismic resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-1144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.03.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Essex: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Dams ; Earth ; Earth dam ; Earth dams ; Earthquake construction ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquake loads ; Earthquake resistance ; Earthquakes ; Erosion mechanisms ; Full-scale shaking table test ; Geosynthetic clay liner ; Geosynthetics ; Gravel ; Hydration ; Moisture content ; Plowing ; Rainfall ; Retrofitting ; Seismic engineering ; Shaking ; Studies ; Thickness ; Wetting</subject><ispartof>Geotextiles and geomembranes, 2019-08, Vol.47 (4), p.502-513</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakazawa, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Take, W. Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawabata, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><title>Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading</title><title>Geotextiles and geomembranes</title><description>This paper reports results of full scale testing to further explore potential GCL damage mechanisms in earth dam retrofit applications in seismically active areas; in particular, to a) investigate whether shear displacements could reduce the magnitude of GCL panel overlap during earthquake shaking; b) explore the influence of gravel particles on GCL thickness at localised point of contact; and c) observe the consequences of an accidental exposure of an uncovered GCL to short duration rainfall in terms of moisture content and effects during subsequent compaction. The results of these experiments indicate that even under severe shaking no movements were detected at the GCL panel overlap. Whereas gravel particles were observed to locally reduce the thickness of the GCL to 2.2 mm, no plowing of the particle into the GCL occurred due to a lack of shear displacement at the interface, resulting in no localised internal erosion through the barrier. Furthermore, hydration of GCL panels during construction due to surface wetting was observed to result in a state of hydration less than its post-construction state. These results indicate that although each of the three GCL damage mechanisms cannot be ruled out to ever be relevant in practice, the performance of the GCL retrofitted earth dam tested was satisfactory under even severe Level 2 earthquake shaking, and suggests that the retrofitting of small earth dams with GCLs is a promising strategy to improve their static and seismic resistance.</description><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth dam</subject><subject>Earth dams</subject><subject>Earthquake construction</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquake loads</subject><subject>Earthquake resistance</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Erosion mechanisms</subject><subject>Full-scale shaking table test</subject><subject>Geosynthetic clay liner</subject><subject>Geosynthetics</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Hydration</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Plowing</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Retrofitting</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Shaking</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Wetting</subject><issn>0266-1144</issn><issn>1879-3584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDVhinTC281xWFS1IldjA2nLiSeqSxK2dVPD3uBSxZTWbc-_oHkLuGcQMWPa4i1u0I3722MccWBmDiAHYBZmxIi8jkRbJJZkBz7KIsSS5Jjfe7wAgyctiRvxq6jrqa9UhNcMR_WhaNRo7UNvQ9XJDtepVi7THeqsG43sfMOp7FVKo3Lg9AdTh6GxjRqr2-87UPwWeToNGd6YOk_pA2lmlzdDekqtGdR7vfu-cvK-e3pbP0eZ1_bJcbKI6BT5GFS8EFDrVkOtw8jRLkOtKpKUIO4tCs4RrDlWasbICzqo0T8pGNcgUNFlSijl5OPfunT1MYZrc2ckN4aXkQgBwKFMRqPxM1c5677CRe2d65b4kA3kyLHfyz7A8GZYgZDAckotzEsOIo0EnfW1wqFEbh_UotTX_dnwDRo2Jtw</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Sawada, Yutaka</creator><creator>Nakazawa, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Take, W. Andy</creator><creator>Kawabata, Toshinori</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading</title><author>Sawada, Yutaka ; Nakazawa, Hiroshi ; Take, W. Andy ; Kawabata, Toshinori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth dam</topic><topic>Earth dams</topic><topic>Earthquake construction</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquake loads</topic><topic>Earthquake resistance</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Erosion mechanisms</topic><topic>Full-scale shaking table test</topic><topic>Geosynthetic clay liner</topic><topic>Geosynthetics</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Hydration</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Plowing</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Retrofitting</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Shaking</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Wetting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakazawa, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Take, W. Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawabata, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geotextiles and geomembranes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sawada, Yutaka</au><au>Nakazawa, Hiroshi</au><au>Take, W. Andy</au><au>Kawabata, Toshinori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading</atitle><jtitle>Geotextiles and geomembranes</jtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>502</spage><epage>513</epage><pages>502-513</pages><issn>0266-1144</issn><eissn>1879-3584</eissn><abstract>This paper reports results of full scale testing to further explore potential GCL damage mechanisms in earth dam retrofit applications in seismically active areas; in particular, to a) investigate whether shear displacements could reduce the magnitude of GCL panel overlap during earthquake shaking; b) explore the influence of gravel particles on GCL thickness at localised point of contact; and c) observe the consequences of an accidental exposure of an uncovered GCL to short duration rainfall in terms of moisture content and effects during subsequent compaction. The results of these experiments indicate that even under severe shaking no movements were detected at the GCL panel overlap. Whereas gravel particles were observed to locally reduce the thickness of the GCL to 2.2 mm, no plowing of the particle into the GCL occurred due to a lack of shear displacement at the interface, resulting in no localised internal erosion through the barrier. Furthermore, hydration of GCL panels during construction due to surface wetting was observed to result in a state of hydration less than its post-construction state. These results indicate that although each of the three GCL damage mechanisms cannot be ruled out to ever be relevant in practice, the performance of the GCL retrofitted earth dam tested was satisfactory under even severe Level 2 earthquake shaking, and suggests that the retrofitting of small earth dams with GCLs is a promising strategy to improve their static and seismic resistance.</abstract><cop>Essex</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.03.001</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-1144
ispartof Geotextiles and geomembranes, 2019-08, Vol.47 (4), p.502-513
issn 0266-1144
1879-3584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2330020953
source Elsevier
subjects Dams
Earth
Earth dam
Earth dams
Earthquake construction
Earthquake damage
Earthquake loads
Earthquake resistance
Earthquakes
Erosion mechanisms
Full-scale shaking table test
Geosynthetic clay liner
Geosynthetics
Gravel
Hydration
Moisture content
Plowing
Rainfall
Retrofitting
Seismic engineering
Shaking
Studies
Thickness
Wetting
title Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A28%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Full%20scale%20investigation%20of%20GCL%20damage%20mechanisms%20in%20small%20earth%20dam%20retrofit%20applications%20under%20earthquake%20loading&rft.jtitle=Geotextiles%20and%20geomembranes&rft.au=Sawada,%20Yutaka&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=502&rft.epage=513&rft.pages=502-513&rft.issn=0266-1144&rft.eissn=1879-3584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.03.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2330020953%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2330020953&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true