Loading…
Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading
This paper reports results of full scale testing to further explore potential GCL damage mechanisms in earth dam retrofit applications in seismically active areas; in particular, to a) investigate whether shear displacements could reduce the magnitude of GCL panel overlap during earthquake shaking;...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geotextiles and geomembranes 2019-08, Vol.47 (4), p.502-513 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493 |
container_end_page | 513 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 502 |
container_title | Geotextiles and geomembranes |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Sawada, Yutaka Nakazawa, Hiroshi Take, W. Andy Kawabata, Toshinori |
description | This paper reports results of full scale testing to further explore potential GCL damage mechanisms in earth dam retrofit applications in seismically active areas; in particular, to a) investigate whether shear displacements could reduce the magnitude of GCL panel overlap during earthquake shaking; b) explore the influence of gravel particles on GCL thickness at localised point of contact; and c) observe the consequences of an accidental exposure of an uncovered GCL to short duration rainfall in terms of moisture content and effects during subsequent compaction. The results of these experiments indicate that even under severe shaking no movements were detected at the GCL panel overlap. Whereas gravel particles were observed to locally reduce the thickness of the GCL to 2.2 mm, no plowing of the particle into the GCL occurred due to a lack of shear displacement at the interface, resulting in no localised internal erosion through the barrier. Furthermore, hydration of GCL panels during construction due to surface wetting was observed to result in a state of hydration less than its post-construction state. These results indicate that although each of the three GCL damage mechanisms cannot be ruled out to ever be relevant in practice, the performance of the GCL retrofitted earth dam tested was satisfactory under even severe Level 2 earthquake shaking, and suggests that the retrofitting of small earth dams with GCLs is a promising strategy to improve their static and seismic resistance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.03.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2330020953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266114419300366</els_id><sourcerecordid>2330020953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDVhinTC281xWFS1IldjA2nLiSeqSxK2dVPD3uBSxZTWbc-_oHkLuGcQMWPa4i1u0I3722MccWBmDiAHYBZmxIi8jkRbJJZkBz7KIsSS5Jjfe7wAgyctiRvxq6jrqa9UhNcMR_WhaNRo7UNvQ9XJDtepVi7THeqsG43sfMOp7FVKo3Lg9AdTh6GxjRqr2-87UPwWeToNGd6YOk_pA2lmlzdDekqtGdR7vfu-cvK-e3pbP0eZ1_bJcbKI6BT5GFS8EFDrVkOtw8jRLkOtKpKUIO4tCs4RrDlWasbICzqo0T8pGNcgUNFlSijl5OPfunT1MYZrc2ckN4aXkQgBwKFMRqPxM1c5677CRe2d65b4kA3kyLHfyz7A8GZYgZDAckotzEsOIo0EnfW1wqFEbh_UotTX_dnwDRo2Jtw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2330020953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Sawada, Yutaka ; Nakazawa, Hiroshi ; Take, W. Andy ; Kawabata, Toshinori</creator><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Yutaka ; Nakazawa, Hiroshi ; Take, W. Andy ; Kawabata, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports results of full scale testing to further explore potential GCL damage mechanisms in earth dam retrofit applications in seismically active areas; in particular, to a) investigate whether shear displacements could reduce the magnitude of GCL panel overlap during earthquake shaking; b) explore the influence of gravel particles on GCL thickness at localised point of contact; and c) observe the consequences of an accidental exposure of an uncovered GCL to short duration rainfall in terms of moisture content and effects during subsequent compaction. The results of these experiments indicate that even under severe shaking no movements were detected at the GCL panel overlap. Whereas gravel particles were observed to locally reduce the thickness of the GCL to 2.2 mm, no plowing of the particle into the GCL occurred due to a lack of shear displacement at the interface, resulting in no localised internal erosion through the barrier. Furthermore, hydration of GCL panels during construction due to surface wetting was observed to result in a state of hydration less than its post-construction state. These results indicate that although each of the three GCL damage mechanisms cannot be ruled out to ever be relevant in practice, the performance of the GCL retrofitted earth dam tested was satisfactory under even severe Level 2 earthquake shaking, and suggests that the retrofitting of small earth dams with GCLs is a promising strategy to improve their static and seismic resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-1144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.03.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Essex: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Dams ; Earth ; Earth dam ; Earth dams ; Earthquake construction ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquake loads ; Earthquake resistance ; Earthquakes ; Erosion mechanisms ; Full-scale shaking table test ; Geosynthetic clay liner ; Geosynthetics ; Gravel ; Hydration ; Moisture content ; Plowing ; Rainfall ; Retrofitting ; Seismic engineering ; Shaking ; Studies ; Thickness ; Wetting</subject><ispartof>Geotextiles and geomembranes, 2019-08, Vol.47 (4), p.502-513</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakazawa, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Take, W. Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawabata, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><title>Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading</title><title>Geotextiles and geomembranes</title><description>This paper reports results of full scale testing to further explore potential GCL damage mechanisms in earth dam retrofit applications in seismically active areas; in particular, to a) investigate whether shear displacements could reduce the magnitude of GCL panel overlap during earthquake shaking; b) explore the influence of gravel particles on GCL thickness at localised point of contact; and c) observe the consequences of an accidental exposure of an uncovered GCL to short duration rainfall in terms of moisture content and effects during subsequent compaction. The results of these experiments indicate that even under severe shaking no movements were detected at the GCL panel overlap. Whereas gravel particles were observed to locally reduce the thickness of the GCL to 2.2 mm, no plowing of the particle into the GCL occurred due to a lack of shear displacement at the interface, resulting in no localised internal erosion through the barrier. Furthermore, hydration of GCL panels during construction due to surface wetting was observed to result in a state of hydration less than its post-construction state. These results indicate that although each of the three GCL damage mechanisms cannot be ruled out to ever be relevant in practice, the performance of the GCL retrofitted earth dam tested was satisfactory under even severe Level 2 earthquake shaking, and suggests that the retrofitting of small earth dams with GCLs is a promising strategy to improve their static and seismic resistance.</description><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth dam</subject><subject>Earth dams</subject><subject>Earthquake construction</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquake loads</subject><subject>Earthquake resistance</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Erosion mechanisms</subject><subject>Full-scale shaking table test</subject><subject>Geosynthetic clay liner</subject><subject>Geosynthetics</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Hydration</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Plowing</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Retrofitting</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Shaking</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Wetting</subject><issn>0266-1144</issn><issn>1879-3584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDVhinTC281xWFS1IldjA2nLiSeqSxK2dVPD3uBSxZTWbc-_oHkLuGcQMWPa4i1u0I3722MccWBmDiAHYBZmxIi8jkRbJJZkBz7KIsSS5Jjfe7wAgyctiRvxq6jrqa9UhNcMR_WhaNRo7UNvQ9XJDtepVi7THeqsG43sfMOp7FVKo3Lg9AdTh6GxjRqr2-87UPwWeToNGd6YOk_pA2lmlzdDekqtGdR7vfu-cvK-e3pbP0eZ1_bJcbKI6BT5GFS8EFDrVkOtw8jRLkOtKpKUIO4tCs4RrDlWasbICzqo0T8pGNcgUNFlSijl5OPfunT1MYZrc2ckN4aXkQgBwKFMRqPxM1c5677CRe2d65b4kA3kyLHfyz7A8GZYgZDAckotzEsOIo0EnfW1wqFEbh_UotTX_dnwDRo2Jtw</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Sawada, Yutaka</creator><creator>Nakazawa, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Take, W. Andy</creator><creator>Kawabata, Toshinori</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading</title><author>Sawada, Yutaka ; Nakazawa, Hiroshi ; Take, W. Andy ; Kawabata, Toshinori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth dam</topic><topic>Earth dams</topic><topic>Earthquake construction</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquake loads</topic><topic>Earthquake resistance</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Erosion mechanisms</topic><topic>Full-scale shaking table test</topic><topic>Geosynthetic clay liner</topic><topic>Geosynthetics</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Hydration</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Plowing</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Retrofitting</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Shaking</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Wetting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakazawa, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Take, W. Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawabata, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geotextiles and geomembranes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sawada, Yutaka</au><au>Nakazawa, Hiroshi</au><au>Take, W. Andy</au><au>Kawabata, Toshinori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading</atitle><jtitle>Geotextiles and geomembranes</jtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>502</spage><epage>513</epage><pages>502-513</pages><issn>0266-1144</issn><eissn>1879-3584</eissn><abstract>This paper reports results of full scale testing to further explore potential GCL damage mechanisms in earth dam retrofit applications in seismically active areas; in particular, to a) investigate whether shear displacements could reduce the magnitude of GCL panel overlap during earthquake shaking; b) explore the influence of gravel particles on GCL thickness at localised point of contact; and c) observe the consequences of an accidental exposure of an uncovered GCL to short duration rainfall in terms of moisture content and effects during subsequent compaction. The results of these experiments indicate that even under severe shaking no movements were detected at the GCL panel overlap. Whereas gravel particles were observed to locally reduce the thickness of the GCL to 2.2 mm, no plowing of the particle into the GCL occurred due to a lack of shear displacement at the interface, resulting in no localised internal erosion through the barrier. Furthermore, hydration of GCL panels during construction due to surface wetting was observed to result in a state of hydration less than its post-construction state. These results indicate that although each of the three GCL damage mechanisms cannot be ruled out to ever be relevant in practice, the performance of the GCL retrofitted earth dam tested was satisfactory under even severe Level 2 earthquake shaking, and suggests that the retrofitting of small earth dams with GCLs is a promising strategy to improve their static and seismic resistance.</abstract><cop>Essex</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.03.001</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-1144 |
ispartof | Geotextiles and geomembranes, 2019-08, Vol.47 (4), p.502-513 |
issn | 0266-1144 1879-3584 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2330020953 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Dams Earth Earth dam Earth dams Earthquake construction Earthquake damage Earthquake loads Earthquake resistance Earthquakes Erosion mechanisms Full-scale shaking table test Geosynthetic clay liner Geosynthetics Gravel Hydration Moisture content Plowing Rainfall Retrofitting Seismic engineering Shaking Studies Thickness Wetting |
title | Full scale investigation of GCL damage mechanisms in small earth dam retrofit applications under earthquake loading |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A28%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Full%20scale%20investigation%20of%20GCL%20damage%20mechanisms%20in%20small%20earth%20dam%20retrofit%20applications%20under%20earthquake%20loading&rft.jtitle=Geotextiles%20and%20geomembranes&rft.au=Sawada,%20Yutaka&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=502&rft.epage=513&rft.pages=502-513&rft.issn=0266-1144&rft.eissn=1879-3584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.03.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2330020953%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-b28308d5d07d8d57564e2db359320188d142d20b5619b021b5749fafe1a0f6493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2330020953&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |