The validity of the ICD-10 classification of recurrent affective disorders: Do endogenous and psychogenic depressions form a homogeneous diagnositic group?

Fifty-five hospital-treated patients with the ICD-10 diagnosis of 'recurrent depressive episode(s)' were classified according to the Newcastle Depressive Diagnostic Scale as having either psychogenic (n = 25) or endogenous (n = 30) depression and interviewed using several inventories on pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychopathology 2001-01, Vol.34 (1), p.36
Main Authors: Vetter, Peter H, Joachim von Pritzbuer, Jungmann, Karl, Kropp, Peter, Koller, Olaf
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 36
container_title Psychopathology
container_volume 34
creator Vetter, Peter H
Joachim von Pritzbuer
Jungmann, Karl
Kropp, Peter
Koller, Olaf
description Fifty-five hospital-treated patients with the ICD-10 diagnosis of 'recurrent depressive episode(s)' were classified according to the Newcastle Depressive Diagnostic Scale as having either psychogenic (n = 25) or endogenous (n = 30) depression and interviewed using several inventories on personality and psychopathology (Composite International Diagnostic Interview, Symptom Check List, Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, IIP, NEO Five-Factor Personality Inventory, Social Adjustment Scale, Questionnaire of the Motivation to Seek Psychotherapy). Except for the IIP, individual subscales disclosed significant differences between the two groups. In light of these results, the grouping of these two disorders into one diagnostic group in the ICD-10 is critically discussed.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_233347373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67316438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2333473733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjE1OwzAQhS0EEuHnDiP2kZw4tIINixYE-y66qyx7nEyVeoLHrtSzcFkSiQOwenrv-_SuVNV0ram1MftrVen2uau7l1V7q-5Ejlo3c1lV6mc3IJztSJ7yBThAnvvXZls3GtxoRSiQs5k4LjChKylhzGBDQJfpjOBJOHlM8gpbBoyee4xcBGz0MMnFDctADjxOCedDjgKB0wksDHxaIC66J9tHFsqz2icu09uDugl2FHz8y3v19PG-23zWU-LvgpIPRy4pzujQGmO6tVkb8y_pF5zDXBI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233347373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The validity of the ICD-10 classification of recurrent affective disorders: Do endogenous and psychogenic depressions form a homogeneous diagnositic group?</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Vetter, Peter H ; Joachim von Pritzbuer ; Jungmann, Karl ; Kropp, Peter ; Koller, Olaf</creator><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Peter H ; Joachim von Pritzbuer ; Jungmann, Karl ; Kropp, Peter ; Koller, Olaf</creatorcontrib><description>Fifty-five hospital-treated patients with the ICD-10 diagnosis of 'recurrent depressive episode(s)' were classified according to the Newcastle Depressive Diagnostic Scale as having either psychogenic (n = 25) or endogenous (n = 30) depression and interviewed using several inventories on personality and psychopathology (Composite International Diagnostic Interview, Symptom Check List, Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, IIP, NEO Five-Factor Personality Inventory, Social Adjustment Scale, Questionnaire of the Motivation to Seek Psychotherapy). Except for the IIP, individual subscales disclosed significant differences between the two groups. In light of these results, the grouping of these two disorders into one diagnostic group in the ICD-10 is critically discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-4962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-033X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: S. Karger AG</publisher><ispartof>Psychopathology, 2001-01, Vol.34 (1), p.36</ispartof><rights>Copyright S. Karger AG Jan/Feb 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/233347373/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/233347373?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21374,21392,33609,33767,43731,43812,73991,74080</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Peter H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joachim von Pritzbuer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungmann, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kropp, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koller, Olaf</creatorcontrib><title>The validity of the ICD-10 classification of recurrent affective disorders: Do endogenous and psychogenic depressions form a homogeneous diagnositic group?</title><title>Psychopathology</title><description>Fifty-five hospital-treated patients with the ICD-10 diagnosis of 'recurrent depressive episode(s)' were classified according to the Newcastle Depressive Diagnostic Scale as having either psychogenic (n = 25) or endogenous (n = 30) depression and interviewed using several inventories on personality and psychopathology (Composite International Diagnostic Interview, Symptom Check List, Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, IIP, NEO Five-Factor Personality Inventory, Social Adjustment Scale, Questionnaire of the Motivation to Seek Psychotherapy). Except for the IIP, individual subscales disclosed significant differences between the two groups. In light of these results, the grouping of these two disorders into one diagnostic group in the ICD-10 is critically discussed.</description><issn>0254-4962</issn><issn>1423-033X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjE1OwzAQhS0EEuHnDiP2kZw4tIINixYE-y66qyx7nEyVeoLHrtSzcFkSiQOwenrv-_SuVNV0ram1MftrVen2uau7l1V7q-5Ejlo3c1lV6mc3IJztSJ7yBThAnvvXZls3GtxoRSiQs5k4LjChKylhzGBDQJfpjOBJOHlM8gpbBoyee4xcBGz0MMnFDctADjxOCedDjgKB0wksDHxaIC66J9tHFsqz2icu09uDugl2FHz8y3v19PG-23zWU-LvgpIPRy4pzujQGmO6tVkb8y_pF5zDXBI</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Vetter, Peter H</creator><creator>Joachim von Pritzbuer</creator><creator>Jungmann, Karl</creator><creator>Kropp, Peter</creator><creator>Koller, Olaf</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>The validity of the ICD-10 classification of recurrent affective disorders: Do endogenous and psychogenic depressions form a homogeneous diagnositic group?</title><author>Vetter, Peter H ; Joachim von Pritzbuer ; Jungmann, Karl ; Kropp, Peter ; Koller, Olaf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2333473733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Peter H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joachim von Pritzbuer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungmann, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kropp, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koller, Olaf</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Psychopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vetter, Peter H</au><au>Joachim von Pritzbuer</au><au>Jungmann, Karl</au><au>Kropp, Peter</au><au>Koller, Olaf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The validity of the ICD-10 classification of recurrent affective disorders: Do endogenous and psychogenic depressions form a homogeneous diagnositic group?</atitle><jtitle>Psychopathology</jtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><pages>36-</pages><issn>0254-4962</issn><eissn>1423-033X</eissn><abstract>Fifty-five hospital-treated patients with the ICD-10 diagnosis of 'recurrent depressive episode(s)' were classified according to the Newcastle Depressive Diagnostic Scale as having either psychogenic (n = 25) or endogenous (n = 30) depression and interviewed using several inventories on personality and psychopathology (Composite International Diagnostic Interview, Symptom Check List, Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, IIP, NEO Five-Factor Personality Inventory, Social Adjustment Scale, Questionnaire of the Motivation to Seek Psychotherapy). Except for the IIP, individual subscales disclosed significant differences between the two groups. In light of these results, the grouping of these two disorders into one diagnostic group in the ICD-10 is critically discussed.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0254-4962
ispartof Psychopathology, 2001-01, Vol.34 (1), p.36
issn 0254-4962
1423-033X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_233347373
source Criminology Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
title The validity of the ICD-10 classification of recurrent affective disorders: Do endogenous and psychogenic depressions form a homogeneous diagnositic group?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A15%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20validity%20of%20the%20ICD-10%20classification%20of%20recurrent%20affective%20disorders:%20Do%20endogenous%20and%20psychogenic%20depressions%20form%20a%20homogeneous%20diagnositic%20group?&rft.jtitle=Psychopathology&rft.au=Vetter,%20Peter%20H&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.pages=36-&rft.issn=0254-4962&rft.eissn=1423-033X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E67316438%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2333473733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233347373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true