Do Conditionalities Increase Support for Government Transfers?

Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have spread through the developing world in the past two decades. It is often assumed that CCTs enjoy political support in the population precisely because they impose conditions on beneficiaries. This article employs survey experiments in Brazil and Turkey to deter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of development studies 2020-03, Vol.56 (3), p.527-544
Main Authors: Zucco, Cesar, Luna, Juan Pablo, Baykal, O. Gokce
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Antipoverty programs
Behavior
Beneficiaries
Experiments
Government
Politics
Polls & surveys
Population
Subsets
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have spread through the developing world in the past two decades. It is often assumed that CCTs enjoy political support in the population precisely because they impose conditions on beneficiaries. This article employs survey experiments in Brazil and Turkey to determine whether, and in what contexts, making government transfers conditional on behaviour of beneficiaries increases political support for the programmes. Results show that conditional transfers are only marginally more popular than similar unconditional transfers in nationally representative samples, but that this difference is substantially larger among the better-off and among those primed to think of themselves as different from beneficiaries. These findings imply that conditionalities per se are not as strong a determinant of support for transfers as the literature suggests, but that they can still be helpful in building support for transfers among subsets of the population that are least likely to support them.
ISSN:0022-0388
1743-9140
DOI:10.1080/00220388.2019.1577388