Evaluating Article Search and Selection Procedures in Special Education Literature Reviews

Literature reviews allow education professionals to identify effective interventions and assess trends in research and practice. However, issues with transparency and the specific methods used in conducting literature searches have the potential to limit the utility of reviews. This study evaluated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remedial and Special Education 2020-02, Vol.41 (1), p.3-17
Main Authors: King, Seth, Davidson, Kimberly, Chitiyo, Argnue, Apple, Derrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bias
Classification
Educational Research
Literature Reviews
Meta Analysis
Quality control
Search Strategies
Selection
Special Education
Systematic review
Transparency
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Literature reviews allow education professionals to identify effective interventions and assess trends in research and practice. However, issues with transparency and the specific methods used in conducting literature searches have the potential to limit the utility of reviews. This study evaluated the description of article search procedures and selection processes appearing in literature reviews and meta-analyses published in special education journals from 2004 to 2016. Findings reveal a considerable increase in the number of published meta-analyses and systematic reviews over this time period. Nonetheless, the validity of reviews is potentially undermined by incomplete descriptions of methods. Reports of inclusion criteria further suggests the results of many reviews may be biased. A discussion of implications follows a description of findings.
ISSN:0741-9325
1538-4756
DOI:10.1177/0741932518813142