Feeling Bad and Doing Good: Forgivability Through the Lens of Uninvolved Third Parties

Previous forgiveness research has mostly focused on victims' forgiveness of transgressors, and offenders' post-transgression efforts intended to promote victim forgiveness have been collectively branded as apology. However, decisions concerning forgiveness frequently occur outside of dyadi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social psychology (Göttingen, Germany) Germany), 2020, Vol.51 (1), p.35-49
Main Authors: Watanabe, Shoko, Laurent, Sean M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Apology
Crime Victims
Criminal Law
Criminal Offenders
Emotions
Female
Forgiveness
Human
Judgment
Male
Morality
Offenders
Social Perception
Test Construction
Theology
Victims
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Previous forgiveness research has mostly focused on victims' forgiveness of transgressors, and offenders' post-transgression efforts intended to promote victim forgiveness have been collectively branded as apology. However, decisions concerning forgiveness frequently occur outside of dyadic contexts, and the unique roles of repentance and atonement in determining forgivability of offenders, despite their preeminence in theology and law, have received little empirical attention. Across five experiments (N = 938), we show that repentance and atonement independently influence third-party perception of forgivability for a variety of harms, even in disinterested contexts. Our findings provide a systematic examination of decisions about forgivability disentangled from direct personal involvement, demonstrating that components of apology known to facilitate forgiveness in victims also increase perceived forgivability from unharmed observers.
ISSN:1864-9335
2151-2590
DOI:10.1027/1864-9335/a000390