PD36 Scoping Of Interventions Of The Philippines' Most Burdensome Diseases

• Published in: International journal of technology assessment in health care 2018, Vol.34 (S1), p.142-143
• Main Authors: Haw, Nel Jason, Wong, John, Lim, Abigail, Co, Stephanie Anne
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptability; Adolescents; Children; Cost analysis; Developing countries; Disease; Disease control; Feasibility studies; Geriatrics; LDCs; Literature reviews; Pareto optimum; Poster Display Presentations; Pregnancy; Sustainability
• ISSN: 0266-4623; 1471-6348
• DOI: 10.1017/S0266462318003070

Introduction:In 2016, Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data was used to identify the top twenty percent of disease causes in the Philippines, which happened to account for eighty percent of the burden, following the Pareto principle. This study follows from that initial work, aimed at creating a list of cost-effective interventions recommended for priority-setting to achieve universal health coverage (UHC).Methods:A comprehensive literature review search was done, from global sources such as the Disease Control Priorities (DCP) for Developing Countries Project and World Health Organization's (WHO) Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective (CHOICE), and local sources such as clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Forty-seven local experts from thirty-eight medical societies were also consulted on the applicability, appropriateness, adaptability, feasibility of implementation, ability to maintain fidelity, ease of dissemination, and sustainability of selected interventions in the Philippine setting. Resource requirements were then derived using the WHO OneHealth Tool, CPGs, and key informant interviews.Results:A list of 745 interventions categorized by life stages and by level of intervention with estimates of cost-effectiveness was produced. From these, fifty seven percent had cost-effectiveness studies. Primary interventions were found to be the least costly for the pregnant women, newborn, infant, adolescents, adults, and elderly life stages, while tertiary interventions were found to be the least costly for children.Conclusions:The interventions are potential targets for inclusion by policymakers. Additional factors to consider include the appropriateness of the context in which the cost-effectiveness study was conducted, the feasibility of conducting primary HTA locally, the local costs of the intervention, and the need to act quickly before the policy window closes.