Loading…

Optimal Lateral Row Anchor Positioning in Posterior-Superior Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair

Background:The optimal placement of suture anchors in transosseous-equivalent (TOE) double-row rotator cuff repair remains controversial.Purpose:A 3-dimensional (3D) high-resolution micro–computed tomography (micro-CT) histomorphometric analysis of cadaveric proximal humeral greater tuberosities (GT...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2016-11, Vol.4 (11)
Main Authors: Zumstein, Matthias A, Raniga Sumit, Labrinidis Agatha, Eng, Kevin, Bain, Gregory I, Moor, Beat K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1175-fb9166c5ea041260cd87e3a5bc82b2b4d76bb79194756b3d54ae52fe804475b3
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
container_volume 4
creator Zumstein, Matthias A
Raniga Sumit
Labrinidis Agatha
Eng, Kevin
Bain, Gregory I
Moor, Beat K
description Background:The optimal placement of suture anchors in transosseous-equivalent (TOE) double-row rotator cuff repair remains controversial.Purpose:A 3-dimensional (3D) high-resolution micro–computed tomography (micro-CT) histomorphometric analysis of cadaveric proximal humeral greater tuberosities (GTs) was performed to guide optimal positioning of lateral row anchors in posterior-superior (infraspinatus and supraspinatus) TOE rotator cuff repair.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:Thirteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric proximal humeri underwent micro-CT analysis. The histomorphometric parameters analyzed in the standardized volumes of interest included cortical thickness, bone volume, and trabecular properties.Results:Analysis of the cortical thickness of the lateral rows demonstrated that the entire inferior-most lateral row, 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT, had the thickest cortical bone (mean, 0.79 mm; P = .0001), with the anterior-most part of the GT, 15 to 21 mm below its summit, having the greatest cortical thickness of 1.02 mm (P = .008). There was a significantly greater bone volume (BV; posterior, 74.5 ± 27.4 mm3; middle, 55.8 ± 24.9 mm3; anterior, 56.9 ± 20.7 mm3; P = .001) and BV as a percentage of total tissue volume (BV/TV; posterior, 7.3% ± 2.7%, middle, 5.5% ± 2.4%; anterior, 5.6% ± 2.0%; P = .001) in the posterior third of the GT than in intermediate or anterior thirds. In terms of both BV and BV/TV, the juxta-articular medial row had the greatest value (BV, 87.3 ± 25.1 mm3; BV/TV, 8.6% ± 2.5%; P = .0001 for both) followed by the inferior-most lateral row 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT (BV, 62.0 ± 22.7 mm3; BV/TV, 6.1% ± 2.2%; P = .0001 for both). The juxta-articular medial row had the greatest value for both trabecular number (0.3 ± 0.06 mm–1; P = .0001) and thickness (0.3 ± 0.08 μm; P = .0001) with the lowest degree of trabecular separation (1.3 ± 0.4 μm; P = .0001). The structure model index (SMI) has been shown to strongly correlate with bone strength, and this was greatest at the inferior-most lateral row 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT (2.9 ± 0.9; P = .0001).Conclusion:The inferior-most lateral row, 15 to 21 mm from the tip of the GT, has good bone stock, the greatest cortical thickness, and the best SMI for lateral row anchor placement. The anterior-most part of the GT 15 to 21 mm below its summit had the greatest cortical thickness of all zones. The posterior third of the GT also has good bone stock pa
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2325967116671305
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2343019073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2343019073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1175-fb9166c5ea041260cd87e3a5bc82b2b4d76bb79194756b3d54ae52fe804475b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotTstOwzAQtJCQqErvHC1xDvgZJ8cqKg8pUlHJvbITh7oKduoH_D4OsIed3dnR7ABwh9EDxkI8Ekp4XQqMy9wo4ldgtVDFwt2ATQhnlKviuKZiBU77OZpPOcFWRu0zHtw33Nr-5Dx8c8FE46yxH9DYZc0S43zxnubfAXZe2uBC0C4FuLsk8yUnbWM2iTLme5PGER70LI2_BdejnILe_OMadE-7rnkp2v3za7Ntiz6n58Wo6hy851oihkmJ-qESmkqu-ooootggSqVEjWsmeKnowJnUnIy6Qiwziq7B_Z_t7N0l6RCPZ5e8zR-PhDKKcI0EpT9MbViZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2343019073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal Lateral Row Anchor Positioning in Posterior-Superior Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><creator>Zumstein, Matthias A ; Raniga Sumit ; Labrinidis Agatha ; Eng, Kevin ; Bain, Gregory I ; Moor, Beat K</creator><creatorcontrib>Zumstein, Matthias A ; Raniga Sumit ; Labrinidis Agatha ; Eng, Kevin ; Bain, Gregory I ; Moor, Beat K</creatorcontrib><description>Background:The optimal placement of suture anchors in transosseous-equivalent (TOE) double-row rotator cuff repair remains controversial.Purpose:A 3-dimensional (3D) high-resolution micro–computed tomography (micro-CT) histomorphometric analysis of cadaveric proximal humeral greater tuberosities (GTs) was performed to guide optimal positioning of lateral row anchors in posterior-superior (infraspinatus and supraspinatus) TOE rotator cuff repair.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:Thirteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric proximal humeri underwent micro-CT analysis. The histomorphometric parameters analyzed in the standardized volumes of interest included cortical thickness, bone volume, and trabecular properties.Results:Analysis of the cortical thickness of the lateral rows demonstrated that the entire inferior-most lateral row, 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT, had the thickest cortical bone (mean, 0.79 mm; P = .0001), with the anterior-most part of the GT, 15 to 21 mm below its summit, having the greatest cortical thickness of 1.02 mm (P = .008). There was a significantly greater bone volume (BV; posterior, 74.5 ± 27.4 mm3; middle, 55.8 ± 24.9 mm3; anterior, 56.9 ± 20.7 mm3; P = .001) and BV as a percentage of total tissue volume (BV/TV; posterior, 7.3% ± 2.7%, middle, 5.5% ± 2.4%; anterior, 5.6% ± 2.0%; P = .001) in the posterior third of the GT than in intermediate or anterior thirds. In terms of both BV and BV/TV, the juxta-articular medial row had the greatest value (BV, 87.3 ± 25.1 mm3; BV/TV, 8.6% ± 2.5%; P = .0001 for both) followed by the inferior-most lateral row 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT (BV, 62.0 ± 22.7 mm3; BV/TV, 6.1% ± 2.2%; P = .0001 for both). The juxta-articular medial row had the greatest value for both trabecular number (0.3 ± 0.06 mm–1; P = .0001) and thickness (0.3 ± 0.08 μm; P = .0001) with the lowest degree of trabecular separation (1.3 ± 0.4 μm; P = .0001). The structure model index (SMI) has been shown to strongly correlate with bone strength, and this was greatest at the inferior-most lateral row 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT (2.9 ± 0.9; P = .0001).Conclusion:The inferior-most lateral row, 15 to 21 mm from the tip of the GT, has good bone stock, the greatest cortical thickness, and the best SMI for lateral row anchor placement. The anterior-most part of the GT 15 to 21 mm below its summit had the greatest cortical thickness of all zones. The posterior third of the GT also has good bone stock parameters, second only to the medial row. The best site for lateral row cortical anchor placement is 15 to 21 mm below the summit of the GT.Clinical Relevance:Optimal lateral anchor positioning is 15 to 21 mm below the summit of the greater tuberosity in TOE.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2325967116671305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Orthopedics ; Rotator cuff ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2016-11, Vol.4 (11)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1175-fb9166c5ea041260cd87e3a5bc82b2b4d76bb79194756b3d54ae52fe804475b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2343019073?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,25734,27905,27906,36993,44571</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zumstein, Matthias A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raniga Sumit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labrinidis Agatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bain, Gregory I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moor, Beat K</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal Lateral Row Anchor Positioning in Posterior-Superior Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair</title><title>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</title><description>Background:The optimal placement of suture anchors in transosseous-equivalent (TOE) double-row rotator cuff repair remains controversial.Purpose:A 3-dimensional (3D) high-resolution micro–computed tomography (micro-CT) histomorphometric analysis of cadaveric proximal humeral greater tuberosities (GTs) was performed to guide optimal positioning of lateral row anchors in posterior-superior (infraspinatus and supraspinatus) TOE rotator cuff repair.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:Thirteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric proximal humeri underwent micro-CT analysis. The histomorphometric parameters analyzed in the standardized volumes of interest included cortical thickness, bone volume, and trabecular properties.Results:Analysis of the cortical thickness of the lateral rows demonstrated that the entire inferior-most lateral row, 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT, had the thickest cortical bone (mean, 0.79 mm; P = .0001), with the anterior-most part of the GT, 15 to 21 mm below its summit, having the greatest cortical thickness of 1.02 mm (P = .008). There was a significantly greater bone volume (BV; posterior, 74.5 ± 27.4 mm3; middle, 55.8 ± 24.9 mm3; anterior, 56.9 ± 20.7 mm3; P = .001) and BV as a percentage of total tissue volume (BV/TV; posterior, 7.3% ± 2.7%, middle, 5.5% ± 2.4%; anterior, 5.6% ± 2.0%; P = .001) in the posterior third of the GT than in intermediate or anterior thirds. In terms of both BV and BV/TV, the juxta-articular medial row had the greatest value (BV, 87.3 ± 25.1 mm3; BV/TV, 8.6% ± 2.5%; P = .0001 for both) followed by the inferior-most lateral row 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT (BV, 62.0 ± 22.7 mm3; BV/TV, 6.1% ± 2.2%; P = .0001 for both). The juxta-articular medial row had the greatest value for both trabecular number (0.3 ± 0.06 mm–1; P = .0001) and thickness (0.3 ± 0.08 μm; P = .0001) with the lowest degree of trabecular separation (1.3 ± 0.4 μm; P = .0001). The structure model index (SMI) has been shown to strongly correlate with bone strength, and this was greatest at the inferior-most lateral row 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT (2.9 ± 0.9; P = .0001).Conclusion:The inferior-most lateral row, 15 to 21 mm from the tip of the GT, has good bone stock, the greatest cortical thickness, and the best SMI for lateral row anchor placement. The anterior-most part of the GT 15 to 21 mm below its summit had the greatest cortical thickness of all zones. The posterior third of the GT also has good bone stock parameters, second only to the medial row. The best site for lateral row cortical anchor placement is 15 to 21 mm below the summit of the GT.Clinical Relevance:Optimal lateral anchor positioning is 15 to 21 mm below the summit of the greater tuberosity in TOE.</description><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Rotator cuff</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>2325-9671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotTstOwzAQtJCQqErvHC1xDvgZJ8cqKg8pUlHJvbITh7oKduoH_D4OsIed3dnR7ABwh9EDxkI8Ekp4XQqMy9wo4ldgtVDFwt2ATQhnlKviuKZiBU77OZpPOcFWRu0zHtw33Nr-5Dx8c8FE46yxH9DYZc0S43zxnubfAXZe2uBC0C4FuLsk8yUnbWM2iTLme5PGER70LI2_BdejnILe_OMadE-7rnkp2v3za7Ntiz6n58Wo6hy851oihkmJ-qESmkqu-ooootggSqVEjWsmeKnowJnUnIy6Qiwziq7B_Z_t7N0l6RCPZ5e8zR-PhDKKcI0EpT9MbViZ</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Zumstein, Matthias A</creator><creator>Raniga Sumit</creator><creator>Labrinidis Agatha</creator><creator>Eng, Kevin</creator><creator>Bain, Gregory I</creator><creator>Moor, Beat K</creator><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Optimal Lateral Row Anchor Positioning in Posterior-Superior Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair</title><author>Zumstein, Matthias A ; Raniga Sumit ; Labrinidis Agatha ; Eng, Kevin ; Bain, Gregory I ; Moor, Beat K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1175-fb9166c5ea041260cd87e3a5bc82b2b4d76bb79194756b3d54ae52fe804475b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Rotator cuff</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zumstein, Matthias A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raniga Sumit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labrinidis Agatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bain, Gregory I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moor, Beat K</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medicine (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zumstein, Matthias A</au><au>Raniga Sumit</au><au>Labrinidis Agatha</au><au>Eng, Kevin</au><au>Bain, Gregory I</au><au>Moor, Beat K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal Lateral Row Anchor Positioning in Posterior-Superior Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>11</issue><eissn>2325-9671</eissn><abstract>Background:The optimal placement of suture anchors in transosseous-equivalent (TOE) double-row rotator cuff repair remains controversial.Purpose:A 3-dimensional (3D) high-resolution micro–computed tomography (micro-CT) histomorphometric analysis of cadaveric proximal humeral greater tuberosities (GTs) was performed to guide optimal positioning of lateral row anchors in posterior-superior (infraspinatus and supraspinatus) TOE rotator cuff repair.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:Thirteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric proximal humeri underwent micro-CT analysis. The histomorphometric parameters analyzed in the standardized volumes of interest included cortical thickness, bone volume, and trabecular properties.Results:Analysis of the cortical thickness of the lateral rows demonstrated that the entire inferior-most lateral row, 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT, had the thickest cortical bone (mean, 0.79 mm; P = .0001), with the anterior-most part of the GT, 15 to 21 mm below its summit, having the greatest cortical thickness of 1.02 mm (P = .008). There was a significantly greater bone volume (BV; posterior, 74.5 ± 27.4 mm3; middle, 55.8 ± 24.9 mm3; anterior, 56.9 ± 20.7 mm3; P = .001) and BV as a percentage of total tissue volume (BV/TV; posterior, 7.3% ± 2.7%, middle, 5.5% ± 2.4%; anterior, 5.6% ± 2.0%; P = .001) in the posterior third of the GT than in intermediate or anterior thirds. In terms of both BV and BV/TV, the juxta-articular medial row had the greatest value (BV, 87.3 ± 25.1 mm3; BV/TV, 8.6% ± 2.5%; P = .0001 for both) followed by the inferior-most lateral row 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT (BV, 62.0 ± 22.7 mm3; BV/TV, 6.1% ± 2.2%; P = .0001 for both). The juxta-articular medial row had the greatest value for both trabecular number (0.3 ± 0.06 mm–1; P = .0001) and thickness (0.3 ± 0.08 μm; P = .0001) with the lowest degree of trabecular separation (1.3 ± 0.4 μm; P = .0001). The structure model index (SMI) has been shown to strongly correlate with bone strength, and this was greatest at the inferior-most lateral row 15 to 21 mm from the summit of the GT (2.9 ± 0.9; P = .0001).Conclusion:The inferior-most lateral row, 15 to 21 mm from the tip of the GT, has good bone stock, the greatest cortical thickness, and the best SMI for lateral row anchor placement. The anterior-most part of the GT 15 to 21 mm below its summit had the greatest cortical thickness of all zones. The posterior third of the GT also has good bone stock parameters, second only to the medial row. The best site for lateral row cortical anchor placement is 15 to 21 mm below the summit of the GT.Clinical Relevance:Optimal lateral anchor positioning is 15 to 21 mm below the summit of the greater tuberosity in TOE.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks</cop><pub>Sage Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/2325967116671305</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2325-9671
ispartof Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2016-11, Vol.4 (11)
issn 2325-9671
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2343019073
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); SAGE Open Access; PubMed Central (PMC)
subjects Orthopedics
Rotator cuff
Sports medicine
title Optimal Lateral Row Anchor Positioning in Posterior-Superior Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T12%3A14%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20Lateral%20Row%20Anchor%20Positioning%20in%20Posterior-Superior%20Transosseous%20Equivalent%20Rotator%20Cuff%20Repair&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Zumstein,%20Matthias%20A&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=11&rft.eissn=2325-9671&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2325967116671305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2343019073%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1175-fb9166c5ea041260cd87e3a5bc82b2b4d76bb79194756b3d54ae52fe804475b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2343019073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true