Loading…

Survival with Follicular and Hurthle Cell Microcarcinoma Compared to Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Population Study of 84,532 Patients

Background This study compares survival in patients with the rare subtypes of follicular (FTmC) and Hurthle cell (HCmC) microcarcinoma compared to that of papillary thyroid (PTmC) microcarcinoma. Methods Patients with FTmC and HCmC were selected from the National Cancer Database 2004–2015 and compar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of surgery 2020-02, Vol.44 (2), p.469-478
Main Authors: Khokar, Amna M., Holoubek, Simon A., Kuchta, Kristine M., Winchester, David J., Prinz, Richard A., Moo-Young, Tricia A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background This study compares survival in patients with the rare subtypes of follicular (FTmC) and Hurthle cell (HCmC) microcarcinoma compared to that of papillary thyroid (PTmC) microcarcinoma. Methods Patients with FTmC and HCmC were selected from the National Cancer Database 2004–2015 and compared with PTmC. Patient clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression analysis evaluated binary outcomes and predictors of survival. A propensity score matched analysis using age, gender, race, extrathyroidal extension (ETE), nodal status, distant metastasis, radiation, and operation was performed to evaluate the difference in OS with FTmC, HCmC, and PTmC. Results We identified 858 FTmC, 476 HCmC, and 82,056 PTmC. FTmC was less likely to have macroscopic ETE compared to PTmC (2.6% vs. 3.1% p  = 0.03), but more likely to have distant metastasis (2.3% vs. 0.2%, p  
ISSN:0364-2313
1432-2323
DOI:10.1007/s00268-019-05264-9