Laboratory Investigation of Liquid Injectivity in Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery

• Published in: Transport in porous media 2020, Vol.131 (1), p.85-99
• Main Authors: Gong, J., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., Kamarul Bahrim, R. Z., Che Mamat, C. A. N. B., Groenenboom, J., Farajzadeh, R., Rossen, W. R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Capillary flow; Capillary pressure; Civil Engineering; Classical and Continuum Physics; Computed tomography; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Enhanced oil recovery; Gas injection; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences; Hydrogeology; Hydrology/Water Resources; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering; Liquid injection; Sag; Saturation; Surfactants
• ISSN: 0169-3913; 1573-1634
• DOI: 10.1007/s11242-018-01231-5

Surfactant-alternating-gas (SAG) is a favored method of foam injection, in part because of excellent gas injectivity. However, liquid injectivity is usually very poor in SAG. We report a core-flood study of liquid injectivity under conditions like those near an injection well in SAG application in the field, i.e., after a prolonged period of gas injection following foam. We inject foam [gas (nitrogen) and surfactant solution] into a 17-cm-long Berea core at temperature of 90 °C with 40 bar back pressure. Pressure differences are measured and supplemented with CT scans to relate water saturation to mobilities. Liquid injectivity directly following foam is very poor. During prolonged gas injection following foam, a collapsed-foam region forms near the inlet and slowly propagates downstream, in which water saturation is reduced. This decline in liquid saturation reflects in part liquid evaporation, also pressure-driven flow and capillary effects on the core scale. In the collapsed-foam region, liquid mobility during subsequent liquid injection is much greater than downstream, and liquid sweeps the entire core cross section rather than a single finger. Mobility in the region of liquid fingering is insensitive to the quality of foam injected before gas and the duration of the period of gas injection. This implies that at the start of liquid injection in a SAG process in the field, there is a small region very near the well, crucial to injectivity, substantially different from that further out, and not described by current foam models. The results can guide the development of a model for liquid injectivity based on radial propagation of the various banks seen in the experiments.