Evidence of Conflict Extension in Partisans’ Evaluations of People and Inanimate Objects

Prior research shows that partisan bias affects evaluations of people in nonpolitical settings, but it is unclear to what extent this bias informs evaluations of objects other than people in similar contexts. This is an important limitation given the frequency with which brands, locations, and produ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American politics research 2020-03, Vol.48 (2), p.275-285
Main Authors: Banda, Kevin K., Carsey, Thomas M., Severenchuk, Serge
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bias
Conflict
Experiments
Inanimate objects
Partisanship
Polarization
Political parties
Social identity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Prior research shows that partisan bias affects evaluations of people in nonpolitical settings, but it is unclear to what extent this bias informs evaluations of objects other than people in similar contexts. This is an important limitation given the frequency with which brands, locations, and products are associated with parties and political figures. We examine whether partisan bias influences evaluations of inanimate objects in the same way that it does evaluations of people. The results of four survey experiments show that partisans evaluate objects linked to the opposing party less favorably than otherwise identical nonpartisan objects. Moreover, the influence of partisan bias on evaluations of people is comparable in magnitude to the influence of bias on evaluations of various inanimate objects. We interpret these findings through the lens of conflict extension theory by suggesting that conflict between partisans has extended from policy-based to social identity-based conflict even in nonpolitical settings.
ISSN:1532-673X
1552-3373
DOI:10.1177/1532673X19858002