Final Thoughts on Beiläufigkeit

The essays in this theme section demonstrate clearly the diversity and complexity of a topic that seems negligible in practice but emerges as important upon further reflection—the incidentalness of things. In this brief afterword, we highlight three of the themes addressed by all or most of the cont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cambridge archaeological journal 2020-02, Vol.30 (1), p.172-174
Main Authors: Pollock, Susan, Bernbeck, Reinhard, Schreiber, Stefan, Appel, Lena, Loy, Anna K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anthropocentrism
Archaeology
Hahn, Peter
Special Section
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 174
container_issue 1
container_start_page 172
container_title Cambridge archaeological journal
container_volume 30
creator Pollock, Susan
Bernbeck, Reinhard
Schreiber, Stefan
Appel, Lena
Loy, Anna K.
description The essays in this theme section demonstrate clearly the diversity and complexity of a topic that seems negligible in practice but emerges as important upon further reflection—the incidentalness of things. In this brief afterword, we highlight three of the themes addressed by all or most of the contributions, which we suggest are of particular relevance when considering the place of the incidental in our archaeological engagements.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0959774319000568
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2348795826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0959774319000568</cupid><sourcerecordid>2348795826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-f04e3d5dcdc1332f2f8ac1840e66c285ab77ed1e9e66bc46d4c1f0693436f8323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AYhQdRMFYfwF3AdfSfS-ay1GKrUHBhXQ_JXNKpaVNnkoXv45v4Yqa04EJc_RzO-Q4_B6FrDLcYsLh7BVUqIRjFCgBKLk9QhplgBZQMTlG2t4u9f44uUloDYAqCZiifhW3V5stVNzSrPuXdNn9wof3-Gnxo3l3oL9GZr9rkro53gt5mj8vpU7F4mT9P7xeFIVz1hQfmqC2tsQZTSjzxsjJYMnCcGyLLqhbCWezUqGvDuGUGe-CKMsq9pIRO0M2hdxe7j8GlXq-7IY6_JU0ok0KVkvAxhQ8pE7uUovN6F8Omip8ag94Pof8MMTL0yFSbOgbbuN_q_6kfTJReRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2348795826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Final Thoughts on Beiläufigkeit</title><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>Pollock, Susan ; Bernbeck, Reinhard ; Schreiber, Stefan ; Appel, Lena ; Loy, Anna K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Susan ; Bernbeck, Reinhard ; Schreiber, Stefan ; Appel, Lena ; Loy, Anna K.</creatorcontrib><description>The essays in this theme section demonstrate clearly the diversity and complexity of a topic that seems negligible in practice but emerges as important upon further reflection—the incidentalness of things. In this brief afterword, we highlight three of the themes addressed by all or most of the contributions, which we suggest are of particular relevance when considering the place of the incidental in our archaeological engagements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-7743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0959774319000568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Anthropocentrism ; Archaeology ; Hahn, Peter ; Special Section</subject><ispartof>Cambridge archaeological journal, 2020-02, Vol.30 (1), p.172-174</ispartof><rights>Copyright © McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2020</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Feb 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2348795826?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12148,12861,27924,27925,33849,34775,44200,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernbeck, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appel, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loy, Anna K.</creatorcontrib><title>Final Thoughts on Beiläufigkeit</title><title>Cambridge archaeological journal</title><addtitle>CAJ</addtitle><description>The essays in this theme section demonstrate clearly the diversity and complexity of a topic that seems negligible in practice but emerges as important upon further reflection—the incidentalness of things. In this brief afterword, we highlight three of the themes addressed by all or most of the contributions, which we suggest are of particular relevance when considering the place of the incidental in our archaeological engagements.</description><subject>Anthropocentrism</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Hahn, Peter</subject><subject>Special Section</subject><issn>0959-7743</issn><issn>1474-0540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AYhQdRMFYfwF3AdfSfS-ay1GKrUHBhXQ_JXNKpaVNnkoXv45v4Yqa04EJc_RzO-Q4_B6FrDLcYsLh7BVUqIRjFCgBKLk9QhplgBZQMTlG2t4u9f44uUloDYAqCZiifhW3V5stVNzSrPuXdNn9wof3-Gnxo3l3oL9GZr9rkro53gt5mj8vpU7F4mT9P7xeFIVz1hQfmqC2tsQZTSjzxsjJYMnCcGyLLqhbCWezUqGvDuGUGe-CKMsq9pIRO0M2hdxe7j8GlXq-7IY6_JU0ok0KVkvAxhQ8pE7uUovN6F8Omip8ag94Pof8MMTL0yFSbOgbbuN_q_6kfTJReRA</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Pollock, Susan</creator><creator>Bernbeck, Reinhard</creator><creator>Schreiber, Stefan</creator><creator>Appel, Lena</creator><creator>Loy, Anna K.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Final Thoughts on Beiläufigkeit</title><author>Pollock, Susan ; Bernbeck, Reinhard ; Schreiber, Stefan ; Appel, Lena ; Loy, Anna K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-f04e3d5dcdc1332f2f8ac1840e66c285ab77ed1e9e66bc46d4c1f0693436f8323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anthropocentrism</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Hahn, Peter</topic><topic>Special Section</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernbeck, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appel, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loy, Anna K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Cambridge archaeological journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pollock, Susan</au><au>Bernbeck, Reinhard</au><au>Schreiber, Stefan</au><au>Appel, Lena</au><au>Loy, Anna K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Final Thoughts on Beiläufigkeit</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge archaeological journal</jtitle><addtitle>CAJ</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>172-174</pages><issn>0959-7743</issn><eissn>1474-0540</eissn><abstract>The essays in this theme section demonstrate clearly the diversity and complexity of a topic that seems negligible in practice but emerges as important upon further reflection—the incidentalness of things. In this brief afterword, we highlight three of the themes addressed by all or most of the contributions, which we suggest are of particular relevance when considering the place of the incidental in our archaeological engagements.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0959774319000568</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-7743
ispartof Cambridge archaeological journal, 2020-02, Vol.30 (1), p.172-174
issn 0959-7743
1474-0540
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2348795826
source Art, Design and Architecture Collection; Cambridge University Press; Humanities Index
subjects Anthropocentrism
Archaeology
Hahn, Peter
Special Section
title Final Thoughts on Beiläufigkeit
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A05%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Final%20Thoughts%20on%20Beil%C3%A4ufigkeit&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20archaeological%20journal&rft.au=Pollock,%20Susan&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=172-174&rft.issn=0959-7743&rft.eissn=1474-0540&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0959774319000568&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2348795826%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-f04e3d5dcdc1332f2f8ac1840e66c285ab77ed1e9e66bc46d4c1f0693436f8323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2348795826&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0959774319000568&rfr_iscdi=true