Loading…

Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas

Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the Ouachita Highland Province of westcentral Arkansas have some of the largest reported home ranges for this subspecies. Previous research on wild turkeys has generally attributed large home-range size to forage abundance or quality. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American midland naturalist 2001-04, Vol.145 (2), p.247-260
Main Author: THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750
container_end_page 260
container_issue 2
container_start_page 247
container_title The American midland naturalist
container_volume 145
creator THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E
description Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the Ouachita Highland Province of westcentral Arkansas have some of the largest reported home ranges for this subspecies. Previous research on wild turkeys has generally attributed large home-range size to forage abundance or quality. However, limitations in reproduction by wild turkeys in the Ouachitas may influence home-range size and habitat selection. To discern factors governing home-range size, I examined habitat use by 54 female wild turkeys from 1993 to 1996. Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) and mixed pine–hardwood sawtimber were selected over other overstory cover types, whereas blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Acer rubrum) and white oak (Quercus alba) were favored in the understory. Mean fixed kernel home-range size during the breeding season was 18.9 km2, the largest reproductive period home range reported for the eastern subspecies. Home-range size varied as a function of age, body mass, reproductive status and the structure of selected habitats. Subadult females occupied larger home ranges (x̄ = 32.0 km2, se = 7.0) than adult females (16.3 ± 1.7 km2) and moved greater distances between nest sites in subsequent years (8.9 ± 1.8 km vs. 2.4 ± 1.1 km, respectively). After removing effects of age, heavier females occupied smaller home ranges than lighter females. Nesting individuals occupied less area than non-nesters, and female turkeys that occupied smaller areas avoided stands of seedlings and saplings in favor of mature poletimber. Taken together, effects of physiological condition and experience influenced home-range size in female wild turkeys in westcentral Arkansas.
doi_str_mv 10.1674/0003-0031(2001)145[0247:HRSAHS]2.0.CO;2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_234956538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3083104</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3083104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_wIfg0_bQLUmTNtWnMbZVUAZu4oNouF3T0a1rZtIJ89fbUtkP8OFyuZxzz4EPoSElAxqEfEgI8b16aI8RQvuUi3fCeHgfvyxG8eKDDchgPH9gZ6hDI196nPnyHHVOX5foyrlNfUY84h30GZud9iyUa40X-Y_GUKY4hiSvoMILXehVlZsSmwxP9Q4Kjd_yIsXLg93qo8O959oBa5s7vIaiMHv4Nn2cl3hkt1A6cNfoIoPC6Zu_3UWv08lyHHtP89njePTkJTzwKy9kwESQEg0y5ZSSjIMI01AKCQyihKQpYyzMsmgVSJAiAQ4BJEEoRJZQHQrSRXdt7t6ar4N2ldqYgy3rSsV8HolA-LI2zVrTyhrnrM7U3uY7sEdFiWrYqoaSaiiphq2q2aqGrWrZKqaIGs9rrYtu26SNq4w9xfhE-pTwWp60cpIbU-p_1_wCkEaNFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234956538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas</title><creator>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</creator><creatorcontrib>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</creatorcontrib><description>Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the Ouachita Highland Province of westcentral Arkansas have some of the largest reported home ranges for this subspecies. Previous research on wild turkeys has generally attributed large home-range size to forage abundance or quality. However, limitations in reproduction by wild turkeys in the Ouachitas may influence home-range size and habitat selection. To discern factors governing home-range size, I examined habitat use by 54 female wild turkeys from 1993 to 1996. Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) and mixed pine–hardwood sawtimber were selected over other overstory cover types, whereas blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Acer rubrum) and white oak (Quercus alba) were favored in the understory. Mean fixed kernel home-range size during the breeding season was 18.9 km2, the largest reproductive period home range reported for the eastern subspecies. Home-range size varied as a function of age, body mass, reproductive status and the structure of selected habitats. Subadult females occupied larger home ranges (x̄ = 32.0 km2, se = 7.0) than adult females (16.3 ± 1.7 km2) and moved greater distances between nest sites in subsequent years (8.9 ± 1.8 km vs. 2.4 ± 1.1 km, respectively). After removing effects of age, heavier females occupied smaller home ranges than lighter females. Nesting individuals occupied less area than non-nesters, and female turkeys that occupied smaller areas avoided stands of seedlings and saplings in favor of mature poletimber. Taken together, effects of physiological condition and experience influenced home-range size in female wild turkeys in westcentral Arkansas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2001)145[0247:HRSAHS]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNAAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal nesting ; Contents ; Female animals ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Hardwoods ; Highlands ; Nesting sites ; Overstory ; Reproduction ; Size ; Turkeys ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>The American midland naturalist, 2001-04, Vol.145 (2), p.247-260</ispartof><rights>University of Notre Dame</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 American Midland Naturalist</rights><rights>Copyright American Midland Naturalist Apr 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</creatorcontrib><title>Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas</title><title>The American midland naturalist</title><description>Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the Ouachita Highland Province of westcentral Arkansas have some of the largest reported home ranges for this subspecies. Previous research on wild turkeys has generally attributed large home-range size to forage abundance or quality. However, limitations in reproduction by wild turkeys in the Ouachitas may influence home-range size and habitat selection. To discern factors governing home-range size, I examined habitat use by 54 female wild turkeys from 1993 to 1996. Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) and mixed pine–hardwood sawtimber were selected over other overstory cover types, whereas blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Acer rubrum) and white oak (Quercus alba) were favored in the understory. Mean fixed kernel home-range size during the breeding season was 18.9 km2, the largest reproductive period home range reported for the eastern subspecies. Home-range size varied as a function of age, body mass, reproductive status and the structure of selected habitats. Subadult females occupied larger home ranges (x̄ = 32.0 km2, se = 7.0) than adult females (16.3 ± 1.7 km2) and moved greater distances between nest sites in subsequent years (8.9 ± 1.8 km vs. 2.4 ± 1.1 km, respectively). After removing effects of age, heavier females occupied smaller home ranges than lighter females. Nesting individuals occupied less area than non-nesters, and female turkeys that occupied smaller areas avoided stands of seedlings and saplings in favor of mature poletimber. Taken together, effects of physiological condition and experience influenced home-range size in female wild turkeys in westcentral Arkansas.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Contents</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Highlands</subject><subject>Nesting sites</subject><subject>Overstory</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Size</subject><subject>Turkeys</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0003-0031</issn><issn>1938-4238</issn><fulltext>false</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_wIfg0_bQLUmTNtWnMbZVUAZu4oNouF3T0a1rZtIJ89fbUtkP8OFyuZxzz4EPoSElAxqEfEgI8b16aI8RQvuUi3fCeHgfvyxG8eKDDchgPH9gZ6hDI196nPnyHHVOX5foyrlNfUY84h30GZud9iyUa40X-Y_GUKY4hiSvoMILXehVlZsSmwxP9Q4Kjd_yIsXLg93qo8O959oBa5s7vIaiMHv4Nn2cl3hkt1A6cNfoIoPC6Zu_3UWv08lyHHtP89njePTkJTzwKy9kwESQEg0y5ZSSjIMI01AKCQyihKQpYyzMsmgVSJAiAQ4BJEEoRJZQHQrSRXdt7t6ar4N2ldqYgy3rSsV8HolA-LI2zVrTyhrnrM7U3uY7sEdFiWrYqoaSaiiphq2q2aqGrWrZKqaIGs9rrYtu26SNq4w9xfhE-pTwWp60cpIbU-p_1_wCkEaNFQ</recordid><startdate>20010401</startdate><enddate>20010401</enddate><creator>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</creator><general>University of Notre Dame</general><general>American Midland Naturalist</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010401</creationdate><title>Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas</title><author>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Contents</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Highlands</topic><topic>Nesting sites</topic><topic>Overstory</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Size</topic><topic>Turkeys</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><creatorcontrib>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>no_fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas</atitle><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle><date>2001-04-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>247-260</pages><issn>0003-0031</issn><eissn>1938-4238</eissn><coden>AMNAAF</coden><abstract>Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the Ouachita Highland Province of westcentral Arkansas have some of the largest reported home ranges for this subspecies. Previous research on wild turkeys has generally attributed large home-range size to forage abundance or quality. However, limitations in reproduction by wild turkeys in the Ouachitas may influence home-range size and habitat selection. To discern factors governing home-range size, I examined habitat use by 54 female wild turkeys from 1993 to 1996. Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) and mixed pine–hardwood sawtimber were selected over other overstory cover types, whereas blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Acer rubrum) and white oak (Quercus alba) were favored in the understory. Mean fixed kernel home-range size during the breeding season was 18.9 km2, the largest reproductive period home range reported for the eastern subspecies. Home-range size varied as a function of age, body mass, reproductive status and the structure of selected habitats. Subadult females occupied larger home ranges (x̄ = 32.0 km2, se = 7.0) than adult females (16.3 ± 1.7 km2) and moved greater distances between nest sites in subsequent years (8.9 ± 1.8 km vs. 2.4 ± 1.1 km, respectively). After removing effects of age, heavier females occupied smaller home ranges than lighter females. Nesting individuals occupied less area than non-nesters, and female turkeys that occupied smaller areas avoided stands of seedlings and saplings in favor of mature poletimber. Taken together, effects of physiological condition and experience influenced home-range size in female wild turkeys in westcentral Arkansas.</abstract><cop>Notre Dame</cop><pub>University of Notre Dame</pub><doi>10.1674/0003-0031(2001)145[0247:HRSAHS]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext no_fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0031
ispartof The American midland naturalist, 2001-04, Vol.145 (2), p.247-260
issn 0003-0031
1938-4238
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_234956538
source
subjects Animal behavior
Animal nesting
Contents
Female animals
Habitat selection
Habitats
Hardwoods
Highlands
Nesting sites
Overstory
Reproduction
Size
Turkeys
Wildfowl
Wildlife habitats
title Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A12%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Home-range%20Size%20and%20Habitat%20Selection%20of%20Female%20Wild%20Turkeys%20(Meleagris%20gallopavo)%20in%20Arkansas&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20midland%20naturalist&rft.au=THOGMARTIN,%20WAYNE%20E&rft.date=2001-04-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=247-260&rft.issn=0003-0031&rft.eissn=1938-4238&rft.coden=AMNAAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1674/0003-0031(2001)145%5B0247:HRSAHS%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3083104%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234956538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3083104&rfr_iscdi=true