Loading…
Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas
Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the Ouachita Highland Province of westcentral Arkansas have some of the largest reported home ranges for this subspecies. Previous research on wild turkeys has generally attributed large home-range size to forage abundance or quality. However,...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American midland naturalist 2001-04, Vol.145 (2), p.247-260 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750 |
container_end_page | 260 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | The American midland naturalist |
container_volume | 145 |
creator | THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E |
description | Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the Ouachita Highland Province of westcentral Arkansas have some of the largest reported home ranges for this subspecies. Previous research on wild turkeys has generally attributed large home-range size to forage abundance or quality. However, limitations in reproduction by wild turkeys in the Ouachitas may influence home-range size and habitat selection. To discern factors governing home-range size, I examined habitat use by 54 female wild turkeys from 1993 to 1996. Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) and mixed pine–hardwood sawtimber were selected over other overstory cover types, whereas blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Acer rubrum) and white oak (Quercus alba) were favored in the understory. Mean fixed kernel home-range size during the breeding season was 18.9 km2, the largest reproductive period home range reported for the eastern subspecies. Home-range size varied as a function of age, body mass, reproductive status and the structure of selected habitats. Subadult females occupied larger home ranges (x̄ = 32.0 km2, se = 7.0) than adult females (16.3 ± 1.7 km2) and moved greater distances between nest sites in subsequent years (8.9 ± 1.8 km vs. 2.4 ± 1.1 km, respectively). After removing effects of age, heavier females occupied smaller home ranges than lighter females. Nesting individuals occupied less area than non-nesters, and female turkeys that occupied smaller areas avoided stands of seedlings and saplings in favor of mature poletimber. Taken together, effects of physiological condition and experience influenced home-range size in female wild turkeys in westcentral Arkansas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1674/0003-0031(2001)145[0247:HRSAHS]2.0.CO;2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_234956538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3083104</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3083104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_wIfg0_bQLUmTNtWnMbZVUAZu4oNouF3T0a1rZtIJ89fbUtkP8OFyuZxzz4EPoSElAxqEfEgI8b16aI8RQvuUi3fCeHgfvyxG8eKDDchgPH9gZ6hDI196nPnyHHVOX5foyrlNfUY84h30GZud9iyUa40X-Y_GUKY4hiSvoMILXehVlZsSmwxP9Q4Kjd_yIsXLg93qo8O959oBa5s7vIaiMHv4Nn2cl3hkt1A6cNfoIoPC6Zu_3UWv08lyHHtP89njePTkJTzwKy9kwESQEg0y5ZSSjIMI01AKCQyihKQpYyzMsmgVSJAiAQ4BJEEoRJZQHQrSRXdt7t6ar4N2ldqYgy3rSsV8HolA-LI2zVrTyhrnrM7U3uY7sEdFiWrYqoaSaiiphq2q2aqGrWrZKqaIGs9rrYtu26SNq4w9xfhE-pTwWp60cpIbU-p_1_wCkEaNFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234956538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas</title><creator>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</creator><creatorcontrib>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</creatorcontrib><description>Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the Ouachita Highland Province of westcentral Arkansas have some of the largest reported home ranges for this subspecies. Previous research on wild turkeys has generally attributed large home-range size to forage abundance or quality. However, limitations in reproduction by wild turkeys in the Ouachitas may influence home-range size and habitat selection. To discern factors governing home-range size, I examined habitat use by 54 female wild turkeys from 1993 to 1996. Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) and mixed pine–hardwood sawtimber were selected over other overstory cover types, whereas blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Acer rubrum) and white oak (Quercus alba) were favored in the understory. Mean fixed kernel home-range size during the breeding season was 18.9 km2, the largest reproductive period home range reported for the eastern subspecies. Home-range size varied as a function of age, body mass, reproductive status and the structure of selected habitats. Subadult females occupied larger home ranges (x̄ = 32.0 km2, se = 7.0) than adult females (16.3 ± 1.7 km2) and moved greater distances between nest sites in subsequent years (8.9 ± 1.8 km vs. 2.4 ± 1.1 km, respectively). After removing effects of age, heavier females occupied smaller home ranges than lighter females. Nesting individuals occupied less area than non-nesters, and female turkeys that occupied smaller areas avoided stands of seedlings and saplings in favor of mature poletimber. Taken together, effects of physiological condition and experience influenced home-range size in female wild turkeys in westcentral Arkansas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2001)145[0247:HRSAHS]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNAAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal nesting ; Contents ; Female animals ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Hardwoods ; Highlands ; Nesting sites ; Overstory ; Reproduction ; Size ; Turkeys ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>The American midland naturalist, 2001-04, Vol.145 (2), p.247-260</ispartof><rights>University of Notre Dame</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 American Midland Naturalist</rights><rights>Copyright American Midland Naturalist Apr 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</creatorcontrib><title>Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas</title><title>The American midland naturalist</title><description>Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the Ouachita Highland Province of westcentral Arkansas have some of the largest reported home ranges for this subspecies. Previous research on wild turkeys has generally attributed large home-range size to forage abundance or quality. However, limitations in reproduction by wild turkeys in the Ouachitas may influence home-range size and habitat selection. To discern factors governing home-range size, I examined habitat use by 54 female wild turkeys from 1993 to 1996. Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) and mixed pine–hardwood sawtimber were selected over other overstory cover types, whereas blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Acer rubrum) and white oak (Quercus alba) were favored in the understory. Mean fixed kernel home-range size during the breeding season was 18.9 km2, the largest reproductive period home range reported for the eastern subspecies. Home-range size varied as a function of age, body mass, reproductive status and the structure of selected habitats. Subadult females occupied larger home ranges (x̄ = 32.0 km2, se = 7.0) than adult females (16.3 ± 1.7 km2) and moved greater distances between nest sites in subsequent years (8.9 ± 1.8 km vs. 2.4 ± 1.1 km, respectively). After removing effects of age, heavier females occupied smaller home ranges than lighter females. Nesting individuals occupied less area than non-nesters, and female turkeys that occupied smaller areas avoided stands of seedlings and saplings in favor of mature poletimber. Taken together, effects of physiological condition and experience influenced home-range size in female wild turkeys in westcentral Arkansas.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Contents</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Highlands</subject><subject>Nesting sites</subject><subject>Overstory</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Size</subject><subject>Turkeys</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0003-0031</issn><issn>1938-4238</issn><fulltext>false</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_wIfg0_bQLUmTNtWnMbZVUAZu4oNouF3T0a1rZtIJ89fbUtkP8OFyuZxzz4EPoSElAxqEfEgI8b16aI8RQvuUi3fCeHgfvyxG8eKDDchgPH9gZ6hDI196nPnyHHVOX5foyrlNfUY84h30GZud9iyUa40X-Y_GUKY4hiSvoMILXehVlZsSmwxP9Q4Kjd_yIsXLg93qo8O959oBa5s7vIaiMHv4Nn2cl3hkt1A6cNfoIoPC6Zu_3UWv08lyHHtP89njePTkJTzwKy9kwESQEg0y5ZSSjIMI01AKCQyihKQpYyzMsmgVSJAiAQ4BJEEoRJZQHQrSRXdt7t6ar4N2ldqYgy3rSsV8HolA-LI2zVrTyhrnrM7U3uY7sEdFiWrYqoaSaiiphq2q2aqGrWrZKqaIGs9rrYtu26SNq4w9xfhE-pTwWp60cpIbU-p_1_wCkEaNFQ</recordid><startdate>20010401</startdate><enddate>20010401</enddate><creator>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</creator><general>University of Notre Dame</general><general>American Midland Naturalist</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010401</creationdate><title>Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas</title><author>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Contents</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Highlands</topic><topic>Nesting sites</topic><topic>Overstory</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Size</topic><topic>Turkeys</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><creatorcontrib>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>no_fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>THOGMARTIN, WAYNE E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas</atitle><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle><date>2001-04-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>247-260</pages><issn>0003-0031</issn><eissn>1938-4238</eissn><coden>AMNAAF</coden><abstract>Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the Ouachita Highland Province of westcentral Arkansas have some of the largest reported home ranges for this subspecies. Previous research on wild turkeys has generally attributed large home-range size to forage abundance or quality. However, limitations in reproduction by wild turkeys in the Ouachitas may influence home-range size and habitat selection. To discern factors governing home-range size, I examined habitat use by 54 female wild turkeys from 1993 to 1996. Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) and mixed pine–hardwood sawtimber were selected over other overstory cover types, whereas blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Acer rubrum) and white oak (Quercus alba) were favored in the understory. Mean fixed kernel home-range size during the breeding season was 18.9 km2, the largest reproductive period home range reported for the eastern subspecies. Home-range size varied as a function of age, body mass, reproductive status and the structure of selected habitats. Subadult females occupied larger home ranges (x̄ = 32.0 km2, se = 7.0) than adult females (16.3 ± 1.7 km2) and moved greater distances between nest sites in subsequent years (8.9 ± 1.8 km vs. 2.4 ± 1.1 km, respectively). After removing effects of age, heavier females occupied smaller home ranges than lighter females. Nesting individuals occupied less area than non-nesters, and female turkeys that occupied smaller areas avoided stands of seedlings and saplings in favor of mature poletimber. Taken together, effects of physiological condition and experience influenced home-range size in female wild turkeys in westcentral Arkansas.</abstract><cop>Notre Dame</cop><pub>University of Notre Dame</pub><doi>10.1674/0003-0031(2001)145[0247:HRSAHS]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | no_fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0031 |
ispartof | The American midland naturalist, 2001-04, Vol.145 (2), p.247-260 |
issn | 0003-0031 1938-4238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_234956538 |
source | |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal nesting Contents Female animals Habitat selection Habitats Hardwoods Highlands Nesting sites Overstory Reproduction Size Turkeys Wildfowl Wildlife habitats |
title | Home-range Size and Habitat Selection of Female Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Arkansas |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A12%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Home-range%20Size%20and%20Habitat%20Selection%20of%20Female%20Wild%20Turkeys%20(Meleagris%20gallopavo)%20in%20Arkansas&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20midland%20naturalist&rft.au=THOGMARTIN,%20WAYNE%20E&rft.date=2001-04-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=247-260&rft.issn=0003-0031&rft.eissn=1938-4238&rft.coden=AMNAAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1674/0003-0031(2001)145%5B0247:HRSAHS%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3083104%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-72a256d0ea8d4110f4a57d7858a2a9b0dd2227ff9c68a85ba4a6ab6755fb1e750%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234956538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3083104&rfr_iscdi=true |