Loading…
CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY
We present a natural environment that sustains full co-operation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. Players sequentially decide whether to contribute to a public good. They do not know their position in the sequence, but observe the actions of some predecess...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Economic journal (London) 2019-07, Vol.129 (621), p.2137-2154 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3 |
container_end_page | 2154 |
container_issue | 621 |
container_start_page | 2137 |
container_title | The Economic journal (London) |
container_volume | 129 |
creator | Gallice, Andrea Monzón, Ignacio |
description | We present a natural environment that sustains full co-operation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. Players sequentially decide whether to contribute to a public good. They do not know their position in the sequence, but observe the actions of some predecessors. Since agents realise that their own action may be observed, they have an incentive to contribute in order to induce potential successors to also do so. Full contribution can then emerge in equilibrium. The same environment leads to full co-operation in the prisoners’ dilemma. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ecoj.12636 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2350419300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26807530</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1111/ecoj.12636</oup_id><sourcerecordid>26807530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EFLwzAUB_AgCs7pxbtQEC9CNXlpkxW8lFq3QNeMrTt4Cm3WgEXtTLaD395sFY--x-NdfrwHf4SuCX4gvh5b3XcPBBhlJ2hEIjYJMST8FI0wJjT0Q8_RhXMd9gU0GqGnTIZykS_TSsgyEGWwkplIi-BZFPl8nq6CaraU6-ksWMiVOJp1meXLKhVl9XqJzkz97tqr3z1G65e8ymZhIaciS4tQR5TvQgNAiDEwgQb0RiecEwbAG-27xc0G65jHtUliIFHNGk5owxoaUxMZwim0dIxuh7tb23_tW7dTXb-3n_6lAhrjiCQUY6_uB6Vt75xtjdrat4_afiuC1SEddUhHHdPx-G7A_X77v7sZXOd2vf2TwCaYxxTTH-bLZrU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2350419300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Gallice, Andrea ; Monzón, Ignacio</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallice, Andrea ; Monzón, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><description>We present a natural environment that sustains full co-operation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. Players sequentially decide whether to contribute to a public good. They do not know their position in the sequence, but observe the actions of some predecessors. Since agents realise that their own action may be observed, they have an incentive to contribute in order to induce potential successors to also do so. Full contribution can then emerge in equilibrium. The same environment leads to full co-operation in the prisoners’ dilemma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Economic theory ; Game theory ; Natural environment ; Social conditions & trends ; Social dilemmas ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>The Economic journal (London), 2019-07, Vol.129 (621), p.2137-2154</ispartof><rights>2019 Royal Economic Society</rights><rights>2019 Royal Economic Society. Published by Oxford University Press. 2019</rights><rights>2019 Royal Economic Society. Published by Oxford University Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallice, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monzón, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><title>CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY</title><title>The Economic journal (London)</title><description>We present a natural environment that sustains full co-operation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. Players sequentially decide whether to contribute to a public good. They do not know their position in the sequence, but observe the actions of some predecessors. Since agents realise that their own action may be observed, they have an incentive to contribute in order to induce potential successors to also do so. Full contribution can then emerge in equilibrium. The same environment leads to full co-operation in the prisoners’ dilemma.</description><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Natural environment</subject><subject>Social conditions & trends</subject><subject>Social dilemmas</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0013-0133</issn><issn>1468-0297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90EFLwzAUB_AgCs7pxbtQEC9CNXlpkxW8lFq3QNeMrTt4Cm3WgEXtTLaD395sFY--x-NdfrwHf4SuCX4gvh5b3XcPBBhlJ2hEIjYJMST8FI0wJjT0Q8_RhXMd9gU0GqGnTIZykS_TSsgyEGWwkplIi-BZFPl8nq6CaraU6-ksWMiVOJp1meXLKhVl9XqJzkz97tqr3z1G65e8ymZhIaciS4tQR5TvQgNAiDEwgQb0RiecEwbAG-27xc0G65jHtUliIFHNGk5owxoaUxMZwim0dIxuh7tb23_tW7dTXb-3n_6lAhrjiCQUY6_uB6Vt75xtjdrat4_afiuC1SEddUhHHdPx-G7A_X77v7sZXOd2vf2TwCaYxxTTH-bLZrU</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Gallice, Andrea</creator><creator>Monzón, Ignacio</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY</title><author>Gallice, Andrea ; Monzón, Ignacio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Natural environment</topic><topic>Social conditions & trends</topic><topic>Social dilemmas</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallice, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monzón, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallice, Andrea</au><au>Monzón, Ignacio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY</atitle><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>621</issue><spage>2137</spage><epage>2154</epage><pages>2137-2154</pages><issn>0013-0133</issn><eissn>1468-0297</eissn><abstract>We present a natural environment that sustains full co-operation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. Players sequentially decide whether to contribute to a public good. They do not know their position in the sequence, but observe the actions of some predecessors. Since agents realise that their own action may be observed, they have an incentive to contribute in order to induce potential successors to also do so. Full contribution can then emerge in equilibrium. The same environment leads to full co-operation in the prisoners’ dilemma.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1111/ecoj.12636</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-0133 |
ispartof | The Economic journal (London), 2019-07, Vol.129 (621), p.2137-2154 |
issn | 0013-0133 1468-0297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2350419300 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Economic theory Game theory Natural environment Social conditions & trends Social dilemmas Uncertainty |
title | CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A23%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CO-OPERATION%20IN%20SOCIAL%20DILEMMAS%20THROUGH%20POSITION%20UNCERTAINTY&rft.jtitle=The%20Economic%20journal%20(London)&rft.au=Gallice,%20Andrea&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=621&rft.spage=2137&rft.epage=2154&rft.pages=2137-2154&rft.issn=0013-0133&rft.eissn=1468-0297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecoj.12636&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26807530%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2350419300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26807530&rft_oup_id=10.1111/ecoj.12636&rfr_iscdi=true |