Loading…

CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY

We present a natural environment that sustains full co-operation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. Players sequentially decide whether to contribute to a public good. They do not know their position in the sequence, but observe the actions of some predecess...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Economic journal (London) 2019-07, Vol.129 (621), p.2137-2154
Main Authors: Gallice, Andrea, Monzón, Ignacio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3
container_end_page 2154
container_issue 621
container_start_page 2137
container_title The Economic journal (London)
container_volume 129
creator Gallice, Andrea
Monzón, Ignacio
description We present a natural environment that sustains full co-operation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. Players sequentially decide whether to contribute to a public good. They do not know their position in the sequence, but observe the actions of some predecessors. Since agents realise that their own action may be observed, they have an incentive to contribute in order to induce potential successors to also do so. Full contribution can then emerge in equilibrium. The same environment leads to full co-operation in the prisoners’ dilemma.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ecoj.12636
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2350419300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26807530</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1111/ecoj.12636</oup_id><sourcerecordid>26807530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EFLwzAUB_AgCs7pxbtQEC9CNXlpkxW8lFq3QNeMrTt4Cm3WgEXtTLaD395sFY--x-NdfrwHf4SuCX4gvh5b3XcPBBhlJ2hEIjYJMST8FI0wJjT0Q8_RhXMd9gU0GqGnTIZykS_TSsgyEGWwkplIi-BZFPl8nq6CaraU6-ksWMiVOJp1meXLKhVl9XqJzkz97tqr3z1G65e8ymZhIaciS4tQR5TvQgNAiDEwgQb0RiecEwbAG-27xc0G65jHtUliIFHNGk5owxoaUxMZwim0dIxuh7tb23_tW7dTXb-3n_6lAhrjiCQUY6_uB6Vt75xtjdrat4_afiuC1SEddUhHHdPx-G7A_X77v7sZXOd2vf2TwCaYxxTTH-bLZrU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2350419300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Gallice, Andrea ; Monzón, Ignacio</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallice, Andrea ; Monzón, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><description>We present a natural environment that sustains full co-operation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. Players sequentially decide whether to contribute to a public good. They do not know their position in the sequence, but observe the actions of some predecessors. Since agents realise that their own action may be observed, they have an incentive to contribute in order to induce potential successors to also do so. Full contribution can then emerge in equilibrium. The same environment leads to full co-operation in the prisoners’ dilemma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Economic theory ; Game theory ; Natural environment ; Social conditions &amp; trends ; Social dilemmas ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>The Economic journal (London), 2019-07, Vol.129 (621), p.2137-2154</ispartof><rights>2019 Royal Economic Society</rights><rights>2019 Royal Economic Society. Published by Oxford University Press. 2019</rights><rights>2019 Royal Economic Society. Published by Oxford University Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallice, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monzón, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><title>CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY</title><title>The Economic journal (London)</title><description>We present a natural environment that sustains full co-operation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. Players sequentially decide whether to contribute to a public good. They do not know their position in the sequence, but observe the actions of some predecessors. Since agents realise that their own action may be observed, they have an incentive to contribute in order to induce potential successors to also do so. Full contribution can then emerge in equilibrium. The same environment leads to full co-operation in the prisoners’ dilemma.</description><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Natural environment</subject><subject>Social conditions &amp; trends</subject><subject>Social dilemmas</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0013-0133</issn><issn>1468-0297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90EFLwzAUB_AgCs7pxbtQEC9CNXlpkxW8lFq3QNeMrTt4Cm3WgEXtTLaD395sFY--x-NdfrwHf4SuCX4gvh5b3XcPBBhlJ2hEIjYJMST8FI0wJjT0Q8_RhXMd9gU0GqGnTIZykS_TSsgyEGWwkplIi-BZFPl8nq6CaraU6-ksWMiVOJp1meXLKhVl9XqJzkz97tqr3z1G65e8ymZhIaciS4tQR5TvQgNAiDEwgQb0RiecEwbAG-27xc0G65jHtUliIFHNGk5owxoaUxMZwim0dIxuh7tb23_tW7dTXb-3n_6lAhrjiCQUY6_uB6Vt75xtjdrat4_afiuC1SEddUhHHdPx-G7A_X77v7sZXOd2vf2TwCaYxxTTH-bLZrU</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Gallice, Andrea</creator><creator>Monzón, Ignacio</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY</title><author>Gallice, Andrea ; Monzón, Ignacio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Natural environment</topic><topic>Social conditions &amp; trends</topic><topic>Social dilemmas</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallice, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monzón, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallice, Andrea</au><au>Monzón, Ignacio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY</atitle><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>621</issue><spage>2137</spage><epage>2154</epage><pages>2137-2154</pages><issn>0013-0133</issn><eissn>1468-0297</eissn><abstract>We present a natural environment that sustains full co-operation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. Players sequentially decide whether to contribute to a public good. They do not know their position in the sequence, but observe the actions of some predecessors. Since agents realise that their own action may be observed, they have an incentive to contribute in order to induce potential successors to also do so. Full contribution can then emerge in equilibrium. The same environment leads to full co-operation in the prisoners’ dilemma.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1111/ecoj.12636</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-0133
ispartof The Economic journal (London), 2019-07, Vol.129 (621), p.2137-2154
issn 0013-0133
1468-0297
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2350419300
source EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Oxford Journals Online
subjects Economic theory
Game theory
Natural environment
Social conditions & trends
Social dilemmas
Uncertainty
title CO-OPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS THROUGH POSITION UNCERTAINTY
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A23%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CO-OPERATION%20IN%20SOCIAL%20DILEMMAS%20THROUGH%20POSITION%20UNCERTAINTY&rft.jtitle=The%20Economic%20journal%20(London)&rft.au=Gallice,%20Andrea&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=621&rft.spage=2137&rft.epage=2154&rft.pages=2137-2154&rft.issn=0013-0133&rft.eissn=1468-0297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecoj.12636&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26807530%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f2211ff282b2cdc97716227bcbcbe0bd0c575af95214a6b713b6b353f4f1732e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2350419300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26807530&rft_oup_id=10.1111/ecoj.12636&rfr_iscdi=true