When Persuasion Goes Undetected: The Case of Comparative Advertising

Why does the weight of current empirical evidence indicate little difference in the persuasiveness of comparative and noncomparative advertising? One explanation explored in this research is that the measures commonly used for assessing the persuasive impact of comparative advertising are limited in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of marketing research 1993-08, Vol.30 (3), p.315-330
Main Authors: Rose, Randall L., Miniard, Paul W., Barone, Michael J., Manning, Kenneth C., Till, Brian D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Advertising
Advertising research
Advertising to sales ratios
Brand preferences
Brands
Choices
Comparative advertising
Consumer behavior
Consumer research
Correlation analysis
Marketing
Memory
Operating costs
Persuasion
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2040-2ed9cbe853f27c59230aa25f997a568c2e12fb341cfe910e57665ee248dd6b43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2040-2ed9cbe853f27c59230aa25f997a568c2e12fb341cfe910e57665ee248dd6b43
container_end_page 330
container_issue 3
container_start_page 315
container_title Journal of marketing research
container_volume 30
creator Rose, Randall L.
Miniard, Paul W.
Barone, Michael J.
Manning, Kenneth C.
Till, Brian D.
description Why does the weight of current empirical evidence indicate little difference in the persuasiveness of comparative and noncomparative advertising? One explanation explored in this research is that the measures commonly used for assessing the persuasive impact of comparative advertising are limited in their ability to capture the unique effects that may arise from this type of advertising. Measures that capture relative impressions of the advertised and comparison brands are found to be far more sensitive in detecting persuasion effects of comparative advertising. Moreover, the appropriateness of different types of relative measures is shown to depend on the correspondence between the encoding frame adopted during ad processing and the measure's response frame.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/002224379303000304
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_235209070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3172884</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3172884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2040-2ed9cbe853f27c59230aa25f997a568c2e12fb341cfe910e57665ee248dd6b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKw0AQhhdRsFZfwNOiXqOzs7vZrLcStQoFPVQ8hm0ysSk2W3fTgm9vQj0I4mGYy_f9w_yMnQu4FsKYGwBEVNJYCRKgH3XARkIrkxhh5SEbDUAyEMfsJMZVz4AAM2J3b0tq-QuFuHWx8S2feor8ta2oo7Kj6pbPl8RzF4n7mud-vXHBdc2O-KTaUeia2LTvp-yodh-Rzn72mM0f7uf5YzJ7nj7lk1lSIihIkCpbLijTskZTaosSnENdW2ucTrMSSWC9kEqUNVkBpE2aaiJUWVWlCyXH7GIfuwn-c0uxK1Z-G9r-YoFSI1gw0EOX_0ECrZEqFThE4Z4qg48xUF1sQrN24asQUAyNFn8b7aWrvbSKnQ-_jf4TU0hhMMuU_Aa6tHEu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297346124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When Persuasion Goes Undetected: The Case of Comparative Advertising</title><source>Nexis UK</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Archive</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Rose, Randall L. ; Miniard, Paul W. ; Barone, Michael J. ; Manning, Kenneth C. ; Till, Brian D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rose, Randall L. ; Miniard, Paul W. ; Barone, Michael J. ; Manning, Kenneth C. ; Till, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><description>Why does the weight of current empirical evidence indicate little difference in the persuasiveness of comparative and noncomparative advertising? One explanation explored in this research is that the measures commonly used for assessing the persuasive impact of comparative advertising are limited in their ability to capture the unique effects that may arise from this type of advertising. Measures that capture relative impressions of the advertised and comparison brands are found to be far more sensitive in detecting persuasion effects of comparative advertising. Moreover, the appropriateness of different types of relative measures is shown to depend on the correspondence between the encoding frame adopted during ad processing and the measure's response frame.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-7193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/002224379303000304</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMKRAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Marketing Association</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Advertising research ; Advertising to sales ratios ; Brand preferences ; Brands ; Choices ; Comparative advertising ; Consumer behavior ; Consumer research ; Correlation analysis ; Marketing ; Memory ; Operating costs ; Persuasion ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of marketing research, 1993-08, Vol.30 (3), p.315-330</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1993 American Marketing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Marketing Association Aug 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2040-2ed9cbe853f27c59230aa25f997a568c2e12fb341cfe910e57665ee248dd6b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2040-2ed9cbe853f27c59230aa25f997a568c2e12fb341cfe910e57665ee248dd6b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/235209070/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1297346124?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,11906,27924,27925,36050,36060,44361,44363,58238,58471,74893,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rose, Randall L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miniard, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barone, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Kenneth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Till, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><title>When Persuasion Goes Undetected: The Case of Comparative Advertising</title><title>Journal of marketing research</title><description>Why does the weight of current empirical evidence indicate little difference in the persuasiveness of comparative and noncomparative advertising? One explanation explored in this research is that the measures commonly used for assessing the persuasive impact of comparative advertising are limited in their ability to capture the unique effects that may arise from this type of advertising. Measures that capture relative impressions of the advertised and comparison brands are found to be far more sensitive in detecting persuasion effects of comparative advertising. Moreover, the appropriateness of different types of relative measures is shown to depend on the correspondence between the encoding frame adopted during ad processing and the measure's response frame.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Advertising research</subject><subject>Advertising to sales ratios</subject><subject>Brand preferences</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Comparative advertising</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer research</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Persuasion</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-2437</issn><issn>1547-7193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKw0AQhhdRsFZfwNOiXqOzs7vZrLcStQoFPVQ8hm0ysSk2W3fTgm9vQj0I4mGYy_f9w_yMnQu4FsKYGwBEVNJYCRKgH3XARkIrkxhh5SEbDUAyEMfsJMZVz4AAM2J3b0tq-QuFuHWx8S2feor8ta2oo7Kj6pbPl8RzF4n7mud-vXHBdc2O-KTaUeia2LTvp-yodh-Rzn72mM0f7uf5YzJ7nj7lk1lSIihIkCpbLijTskZTaosSnENdW2ucTrMSSWC9kEqUNVkBpE2aaiJUWVWlCyXH7GIfuwn-c0uxK1Z-G9r-YoFSI1gw0EOX_0ECrZEqFThE4Z4qg48xUF1sQrN24asQUAyNFn8b7aWrvbSKnQ-_jf4TU0hhMMuU_Aa6tHEu</recordid><startdate>19930801</startdate><enddate>19930801</enddate><creator>Rose, Randall L.</creator><creator>Miniard, Paul W.</creator><creator>Barone, Michael J.</creator><creator>Manning, Kenneth C.</creator><creator>Till, Brian D.</creator><general>American Marketing Association</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>JHMDA</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930801</creationdate><title>When Persuasion Goes Undetected: The Case of Comparative Advertising</title><author>Rose, Randall L. ; Miniard, Paul W. ; Barone, Michael J. ; Manning, Kenneth C. ; Till, Brian D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2040-2ed9cbe853f27c59230aa25f997a568c2e12fb341cfe910e57665ee248dd6b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Advertising research</topic><topic>Advertising to sales ratios</topic><topic>Brand preferences</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Comparative advertising</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer research</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Persuasion</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rose, Randall L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miniard, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barone, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Kenneth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Till, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 31</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1 (purchase pre Feb/2008)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rose, Randall L.</au><au>Miniard, Paul W.</au><au>Barone, Michael J.</au><au>Manning, Kenneth C.</au><au>Till, Brian D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When Persuasion Goes Undetected: The Case of Comparative Advertising</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle><date>1993-08-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>315-330</pages><issn>0022-2437</issn><eissn>1547-7193</eissn><coden>JMKRAE</coden><abstract>Why does the weight of current empirical evidence indicate little difference in the persuasiveness of comparative and noncomparative advertising? One explanation explored in this research is that the measures commonly used for assessing the persuasive impact of comparative advertising are limited in their ability to capture the unique effects that may arise from this type of advertising. Measures that capture relative impressions of the advertised and comparison brands are found to be far more sensitive in detecting persuasion effects of comparative advertising. Moreover, the appropriateness of different types of relative measures is shown to depend on the correspondence between the encoding frame adopted during ad processing and the measure's response frame.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Marketing Association</pub><doi>10.1177/002224379303000304</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2437
ispartof Journal of marketing research, 1993-08, Vol.30 (3), p.315-330
issn 0022-2437
1547-7193
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_235209070
source Nexis UK; ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); ABI/INFORM Archive; JSTOR Archival Journals; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)
subjects Advertising
Advertising research
Advertising to sales ratios
Brand preferences
Brands
Choices
Comparative advertising
Consumer behavior
Consumer research
Correlation analysis
Marketing
Memory
Operating costs
Persuasion
Studies
title When Persuasion Goes Undetected: The Case of Comparative Advertising
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A04%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20Persuasion%20Goes%20Undetected:%20The%20Case%20of%20Comparative%20Advertising&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marketing%20research&rft.au=Rose,%20Randall%20L.&rft.date=1993-08-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=315-330&rft.issn=0022-2437&rft.eissn=1547-7193&rft.coden=JMKRAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/002224379303000304&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3172884%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2040-2ed9cbe853f27c59230aa25f997a568c2e12fb341cfe910e57665ee248dd6b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297346124&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3172884&rfr_iscdi=true