Loading…

Self-similar compressible turbulent boundary layers with pressure gradients. Part 2. Self-similarity analysis of the outer layer

A thorough self-similarity analysis is presented to investigate the properties of self-similarity for the outer layer of compressible turbulent boundary layers. The results are validated using the compressible and quasi-incompressible direct numerical simulation (DNS) data shown and discussed in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of fluid mechanics 2019-12, Vol.880, p.284-325
Main Authors: Gibis, Tobias, Wenzel, Christoph, Kloker, Markus, Rist, Ulrich
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-f9362f59d04baedb55a376075512957700cbddcdeceb31754b5e1fe7fb7af7663
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-f9362f59d04baedb55a376075512957700cbddcdeceb31754b5e1fe7fb7af7663
container_end_page 325
container_issue
container_start_page 284
container_title Journal of fluid mechanics
container_volume 880
creator Gibis, Tobias
Wenzel, Christoph
Kloker, Markus
Rist, Ulrich
description A thorough self-similarity analysis is presented to investigate the properties of self-similarity for the outer layer of compressible turbulent boundary layers. The results are validated using the compressible and quasi-incompressible direct numerical simulation (DNS) data shown and discussed in the first part of this study; see Wenzel et al.  ( J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 880, 2019, pp. 239–283). The analysis is carried out for a general set of characteristic scales, and conditions are derived which have to be fulfilled by these sets in case of self-similarity. To evaluate the main findings derived, four sets of characteristic scales are proposed and tested. These represent compressible extensions of the incompressible edge scaling, friction scaling, Zagarola–Smits scaling and a newly defined Rotta–Clauser scaling. Their scaling success is assessed by checking the collapse of flow-field profiles extracted at various streamwise positions, being normalized by the respective scales. For a good set of scales, most conditions derived in the analysis are fulfilled. As suggested by the data investigated, approximate self-similarity can be achieved for the mean-flow distributions of the velocity, mass flux and total enthalpy and the turbulent terms. Self-similarity thus can be stated to be achievable to a very high degree in the compressible regime. Revealed by the analysis and confirmed by the DNS data, this state is predicted by the compressible pressure-gradient boundary-layer growth parameter $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ , which is similar to the incompressible one found by related incompressible studies. Using appropriate adaption, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ values become comparable for compressible and incompressible pressure-gradient cases with similar wall-normal shear-stress distributions. The Rotta–Clauser parameter in its traditional form $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{K}=(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{K}^{\ast }/\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}_{w})(\text{d}p_{e}/\text{d}x)$ with the kinematic (incompressible) displacement thickness $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{K}^{\ast }$ is shown to be a valid parameter of the form $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ and hence still is a good indicator for equilibrium flow in the compressible regime at the finite Reynolds numbers considered. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that the often neglected derivative of the length scale, $\text{d}L_{0}/\text{d}x$ , can be incorporated, which was found to have an important influence on the scaling succes
doi_str_mv 10.1017/jfm.2019.672
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2353033770</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2353033770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-f9362f59d04baedb55a376075512957700cbddcdeceb31754b5e1fe7fb7af7663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1KxDAURoMoOI7ufICAW1tvkqahSxn8gwEFdR2S9sbJ0E7HJEW689HtWBeu7uZw-O4h5JJBzoCpm63rcg6sykvFj8iCFWWVqbKQx2QBwHnGGIdTchbjFoAJqNSCfL9i67LoO9-aQOu-2weM0dsWaRqCHVrcJWr7YdeYMNLWjBgi_fJpQ3_BISD9CKbxExZz-mJCojyn_6U-jdTsTDtGH2nvaNog7YeEYbadkxNn2ogXf3dJ3u_v3laP2fr54Wl1u85qASxlrhIld7JqoLAGGyulEaoEJSXjlVQKoLZNUzdYoxVMycJKZA6Vs8o4VZZiSa5m7z70nwPGpLf9EKZdUXMhBQgxSSbqeqbq0McY0Ol98N30umagD4311FgfGuupsfgBGSJyPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353033770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-similar compressible turbulent boundary layers with pressure gradients. Part 2. Self-similarity analysis of the outer layer</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Gibis, Tobias ; Wenzel, Christoph ; Kloker, Markus ; Rist, Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Gibis, Tobias ; Wenzel, Christoph ; Kloker, Markus ; Rist, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>A thorough self-similarity analysis is presented to investigate the properties of self-similarity for the outer layer of compressible turbulent boundary layers. The results are validated using the compressible and quasi-incompressible direct numerical simulation (DNS) data shown and discussed in the first part of this study; see Wenzel et al.  ( J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 880, 2019, pp. 239–283). The analysis is carried out for a general set of characteristic scales, and conditions are derived which have to be fulfilled by these sets in case of self-similarity. To evaluate the main findings derived, four sets of characteristic scales are proposed and tested. These represent compressible extensions of the incompressible edge scaling, friction scaling, Zagarola–Smits scaling and a newly defined Rotta–Clauser scaling. Their scaling success is assessed by checking the collapse of flow-field profiles extracted at various streamwise positions, being normalized by the respective scales. For a good set of scales, most conditions derived in the analysis are fulfilled. As suggested by the data investigated, approximate self-similarity can be achieved for the mean-flow distributions of the velocity, mass flux and total enthalpy and the turbulent terms. Self-similarity thus can be stated to be achievable to a very high degree in the compressible regime. Revealed by the analysis and confirmed by the DNS data, this state is predicted by the compressible pressure-gradient boundary-layer growth parameter $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ , which is similar to the incompressible one found by related incompressible studies. Using appropriate adaption, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ values become comparable for compressible and incompressible pressure-gradient cases with similar wall-normal shear-stress distributions. The Rotta–Clauser parameter in its traditional form $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{K}=(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{K}^{\ast }/\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}_{w})(\text{d}p_{e}/\text{d}x)$ with the kinematic (incompressible) displacement thickness $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{K}^{\ast }$ is shown to be a valid parameter of the form $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ and hence still is a good indicator for equilibrium flow in the compressible regime at the finite Reynolds numbers considered. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that the often neglected derivative of the length scale, $\text{d}L_{0}/\text{d}x$ , can be incorporated, which was found to have an important influence on the scaling success of common ‘low-Reynolds-number’ DNS data; this holds for both incompressible and compressible flow. Especially for the scaling of the $\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}}\widetilde{u^{\prime \prime }v^{\prime \prime }}$ stress and thus also the wall shear stress $\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}_{w}$ , the inclusion of $\text{d}L_{0}/\text{d}x$ leads to palpable improvements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Boundary layers ; Collapse ; Compressible flow ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; Data ; Direct numerical simulation ; Enthalpy ; Equilibrium flow ; Fluid flow ; Incompressible flow ; Mathematical models ; Parameters ; Pressure ; Pressure gradients ; Profiles ; Scaling ; Self-similarity ; Shear stress ; Turbulent boundary layer ; Wall shear stresses</subject><ispartof>Journal of fluid mechanics, 2019-12, Vol.880, p.284-325</ispartof><rights>2019 This article is published under (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-f9362f59d04baedb55a376075512957700cbddcdeceb31754b5e1fe7fb7af7663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-f9362f59d04baedb55a376075512957700cbddcdeceb31754b5e1fe7fb7af7663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5352-7442 ; 0000-0002-2526-952X ; 0000-0001-9281-4279</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gibis, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloker, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rist, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Self-similar compressible turbulent boundary layers with pressure gradients. Part 2. Self-similarity analysis of the outer layer</title><title>Journal of fluid mechanics</title><description>A thorough self-similarity analysis is presented to investigate the properties of self-similarity for the outer layer of compressible turbulent boundary layers. The results are validated using the compressible and quasi-incompressible direct numerical simulation (DNS) data shown and discussed in the first part of this study; see Wenzel et al.  ( J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 880, 2019, pp. 239–283). The analysis is carried out for a general set of characteristic scales, and conditions are derived which have to be fulfilled by these sets in case of self-similarity. To evaluate the main findings derived, four sets of characteristic scales are proposed and tested. These represent compressible extensions of the incompressible edge scaling, friction scaling, Zagarola–Smits scaling and a newly defined Rotta–Clauser scaling. Their scaling success is assessed by checking the collapse of flow-field profiles extracted at various streamwise positions, being normalized by the respective scales. For a good set of scales, most conditions derived in the analysis are fulfilled. As suggested by the data investigated, approximate self-similarity can be achieved for the mean-flow distributions of the velocity, mass flux and total enthalpy and the turbulent terms. Self-similarity thus can be stated to be achievable to a very high degree in the compressible regime. Revealed by the analysis and confirmed by the DNS data, this state is predicted by the compressible pressure-gradient boundary-layer growth parameter $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ , which is similar to the incompressible one found by related incompressible studies. Using appropriate adaption, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ values become comparable for compressible and incompressible pressure-gradient cases with similar wall-normal shear-stress distributions. The Rotta–Clauser parameter in its traditional form $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{K}=(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{K}^{\ast }/\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}_{w})(\text{d}p_{e}/\text{d}x)$ with the kinematic (incompressible) displacement thickness $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{K}^{\ast }$ is shown to be a valid parameter of the form $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ and hence still is a good indicator for equilibrium flow in the compressible regime at the finite Reynolds numbers considered. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that the often neglected derivative of the length scale, $\text{d}L_{0}/\text{d}x$ , can be incorporated, which was found to have an important influence on the scaling success of common ‘low-Reynolds-number’ DNS data; this holds for both incompressible and compressible flow. Especially for the scaling of the $\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}}\widetilde{u^{\prime \prime }v^{\prime \prime }}$ stress and thus also the wall shear stress $\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}_{w}$ , the inclusion of $\text{d}L_{0}/\text{d}x$ leads to palpable improvements.</description><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Compressible flow</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Direct numerical simulation</subject><subject>Enthalpy</subject><subject>Equilibrium flow</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Incompressible flow</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Pressure gradients</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Self-similarity</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Turbulent boundary layer</subject><subject>Wall shear stresses</subject><issn>0022-1120</issn><issn>1469-7645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkM1KxDAURoMoOI7ufICAW1tvkqahSxn8gwEFdR2S9sbJ0E7HJEW689HtWBeu7uZw-O4h5JJBzoCpm63rcg6sykvFj8iCFWWVqbKQx2QBwHnGGIdTchbjFoAJqNSCfL9i67LoO9-aQOu-2weM0dsWaRqCHVrcJWr7YdeYMNLWjBgi_fJpQ3_BISD9CKbxExZz-mJCojyn_6U-jdTsTDtGH2nvaNog7YeEYbadkxNn2ogXf3dJ3u_v3laP2fr54Wl1u85qASxlrhIld7JqoLAGGyulEaoEJSXjlVQKoLZNUzdYoxVMycJKZA6Vs8o4VZZiSa5m7z70nwPGpLf9EKZdUXMhBQgxSSbqeqbq0McY0Ol98N30umagD4311FgfGuupsfgBGSJyPA</recordid><startdate>20191210</startdate><enddate>20191210</enddate><creator>Gibis, Tobias</creator><creator>Wenzel, Christoph</creator><creator>Kloker, Markus</creator><creator>Rist, Ulrich</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-7442</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2526-952X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9281-4279</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191210</creationdate><title>Self-similar compressible turbulent boundary layers with pressure gradients. Part 2. Self-similarity analysis of the outer layer</title><author>Gibis, Tobias ; Wenzel, Christoph ; Kloker, Markus ; Rist, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-f9362f59d04baedb55a376075512957700cbddcdeceb31754b5e1fe7fb7af7663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Compressible flow</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Direct numerical simulation</topic><topic>Enthalpy</topic><topic>Equilibrium flow</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Incompressible flow</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Pressure gradients</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Self-similarity</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Turbulent boundary layer</topic><topic>Wall shear stresses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gibis, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloker, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rist, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering &amp; Technology Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of fluid mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gibis, Tobias</au><au>Wenzel, Christoph</au><au>Kloker, Markus</au><au>Rist, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-similar compressible turbulent boundary layers with pressure gradients. Part 2. Self-similarity analysis of the outer layer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fluid mechanics</jtitle><date>2019-12-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>880</volume><spage>284</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>284-325</pages><issn>0022-1120</issn><eissn>1469-7645</eissn><abstract>A thorough self-similarity analysis is presented to investigate the properties of self-similarity for the outer layer of compressible turbulent boundary layers. The results are validated using the compressible and quasi-incompressible direct numerical simulation (DNS) data shown and discussed in the first part of this study; see Wenzel et al.  ( J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 880, 2019, pp. 239–283). The analysis is carried out for a general set of characteristic scales, and conditions are derived which have to be fulfilled by these sets in case of self-similarity. To evaluate the main findings derived, four sets of characteristic scales are proposed and tested. These represent compressible extensions of the incompressible edge scaling, friction scaling, Zagarola–Smits scaling and a newly defined Rotta–Clauser scaling. Their scaling success is assessed by checking the collapse of flow-field profiles extracted at various streamwise positions, being normalized by the respective scales. For a good set of scales, most conditions derived in the analysis are fulfilled. As suggested by the data investigated, approximate self-similarity can be achieved for the mean-flow distributions of the velocity, mass flux and total enthalpy and the turbulent terms. Self-similarity thus can be stated to be achievable to a very high degree in the compressible regime. Revealed by the analysis and confirmed by the DNS data, this state is predicted by the compressible pressure-gradient boundary-layer growth parameter $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ , which is similar to the incompressible one found by related incompressible studies. Using appropriate adaption, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ values become comparable for compressible and incompressible pressure-gradient cases with similar wall-normal shear-stress distributions. The Rotta–Clauser parameter in its traditional form $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{K}=(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{K}^{\ast }/\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}_{w})(\text{d}p_{e}/\text{d}x)$ with the kinematic (incompressible) displacement thickness $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{K}^{\ast }$ is shown to be a valid parameter of the form $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{c}$ and hence still is a good indicator for equilibrium flow in the compressible regime at the finite Reynolds numbers considered. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that the often neglected derivative of the length scale, $\text{d}L_{0}/\text{d}x$ , can be incorporated, which was found to have an important influence on the scaling success of common ‘low-Reynolds-number’ DNS data; this holds for both incompressible and compressible flow. Especially for the scaling of the $\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}}\widetilde{u^{\prime \prime }v^{\prime \prime }}$ stress and thus also the wall shear stress $\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}_{w}$ , the inclusion of $\text{d}L_{0}/\text{d}x$ leads to palpable improvements.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/jfm.2019.672</doi><tpages>42</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-7442</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2526-952X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9281-4279</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1120
ispartof Journal of fluid mechanics, 2019-12, Vol.880, p.284-325
issn 0022-1120
1469-7645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2353033770
source Cambridge University Press
subjects Boundary layers
Collapse
Compressible flow
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer simulation
Data
Direct numerical simulation
Enthalpy
Equilibrium flow
Fluid flow
Incompressible flow
Mathematical models
Parameters
Pressure
Pressure gradients
Profiles
Scaling
Self-similarity
Shear stress
Turbulent boundary layer
Wall shear stresses
title Self-similar compressible turbulent boundary layers with pressure gradients. Part 2. Self-similarity analysis of the outer layer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A41%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-similar%20compressible%20turbulent%20boundary%20layers%20with%20pressure%20gradients.%20Part%202.%20Self-similarity%20analysis%20of%20the%20outer%20layer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fluid%20mechanics&rft.au=Gibis,%20Tobias&rft.date=2019-12-10&rft.volume=880&rft.spage=284&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=284-325&rft.issn=0022-1120&rft.eissn=1469-7645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/jfm.2019.672&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353033770%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-f9362f59d04baedb55a376075512957700cbddcdeceb31754b5e1fe7fb7af7663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353033770&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true