Loading…
A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis
•Parallel-type and embedded-type interval-random models are presented to quantify hybrid uncertainties.•A universal numerical approach is proposed for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis.•The output response in hybrid circumstance is interpreted as an interval number with random bounds.•A cross...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mechanical systems and signal processing 2020-02, Vol.136, p.106531, Article 106531 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 106531 |
container_title | Mechanical systems and signal processing |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Wang, Chong Matthies, Hermann G. |
description | •Parallel-type and embedded-type interval-random models are presented to quantify hybrid uncertainties.•A universal numerical approach is proposed for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis.•The output response in hybrid circumstance is interpreted as an interval number with random bounds.•A cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is constructed to improve the computational cost.
A wide variety of uncertainty propagation methods have been developed to deal with the single uncertainty; however, different kinds of uncertainties may exist simultaneously in many engineering practices. By using random variables and interval variables to quantify the probabilistic and non-probabilistic uncertainties respectively, this paper proposes two different interval-random models and a universal numerical approach for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis. In the first model, uncertain parameters are treated as either random variables or interval variables with deterministic distributions, which exist independently. In the second model, uncertain parameters are quantified as random interval variables, where the bounds of interval variables are expressed as random variables instead of deterministic values. In both models, the effect of input hybrid uncertainties on output response is interpreted by an interval number with random bounds. To predict the moments of random bounds of interval response, a double-loop numerical analysis framework is constructed, where the outer loop is executed to traverse the discrete points for random variables and the inner loop is implemented to capture the response extreme values for interval variables. To further solve the computationally expensive issue caused by the full-scale finite element simulations, a cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is introduced as an approximation, which can achieve an acceptable accuracy through a small number of sample points. Finally, a transient heat conduction example demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed models and method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106531 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2353618197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0888327019307526</els_id><sourcerecordid>2353618197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AjcB1x3zaNN04WIYfMGAG11KSJNUU9qmJulI_70Z69rVhXvPOdzzAXCN0QYjzG7bzdyHMG4IwlXasILiE7DCqGIZJpidghXinGeUlOgcXITQIoSqHLEVeN9C5fpRehntwcAQJz1D18D47aAdovEH2WVeDtr1sHfadAE2zsPPufZWw2lQxkeZhDMcvRvlR4pxA5SD7OZgwyU4a2QXzNXfXIO3h_vX3VO2f3l83m33maIUx6wipORIlYSpusbcUKJ4I5HJ60ajUpcFaSgvEE_XSrFclZwqqbhWeSHzglC6BjdLbnriazIhitZNPj0RBKEFZZjjqkwquqiUdyF404jR2176WWAkjhxFK345iiNHsXBMrrvFlbqbgzVeBGVNKq6tNyoK7ey__h8yCn6X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353618197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Wang, Chong ; Matthies, Hermann G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chong ; Matthies, Hermann G.</creatorcontrib><description>•Parallel-type and embedded-type interval-random models are presented to quantify hybrid uncertainties.•A universal numerical approach is proposed for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis.•The output response in hybrid circumstance is interpreted as an interval number with random bounds.•A cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is constructed to improve the computational cost.
A wide variety of uncertainty propagation methods have been developed to deal with the single uncertainty; however, different kinds of uncertainties may exist simultaneously in many engineering practices. By using random variables and interval variables to quantify the probabilistic and non-probabilistic uncertainties respectively, this paper proposes two different interval-random models and a universal numerical approach for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis. In the first model, uncertain parameters are treated as either random variables or interval variables with deterministic distributions, which exist independently. In the second model, uncertain parameters are quantified as random interval variables, where the bounds of interval variables are expressed as random variables instead of deterministic values. In both models, the effect of input hybrid uncertainties on output response is interpreted by an interval number with random bounds. To predict the moments of random bounds of interval response, a double-loop numerical analysis framework is constructed, where the outer loop is executed to traverse the discrete points for random variables and the inner loop is implemented to capture the response extreme values for interval variables. To further solve the computationally expensive issue caused by the full-scale finite element simulations, a cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is introduced as an approximation, which can achieve an acceptable accuracy through a small number of sample points. Finally, a transient heat conduction example demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed models and method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-3270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-1216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106531</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Comparative studies ; Computer simulation ; Conduction heating ; Conductive heat transfer ; Cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model ; Double-loop numerical analysis framework ; Extreme values ; Hybrid interval-random model ; Interval response with random bounds ; Mathematical models ; Numerical analysis ; Parameter uncertainty ; Propagation ; Random variables ; Transient heat conduction ; Uncertainty analysis ; Uncertainty propagation analysis</subject><ispartof>Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2020-02, Vol.136, p.106531, Article 106531</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthies, Hermann G.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis</title><title>Mechanical systems and signal processing</title><description>•Parallel-type and embedded-type interval-random models are presented to quantify hybrid uncertainties.•A universal numerical approach is proposed for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis.•The output response in hybrid circumstance is interpreted as an interval number with random bounds.•A cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is constructed to improve the computational cost.
A wide variety of uncertainty propagation methods have been developed to deal with the single uncertainty; however, different kinds of uncertainties may exist simultaneously in many engineering practices. By using random variables and interval variables to quantify the probabilistic and non-probabilistic uncertainties respectively, this paper proposes two different interval-random models and a universal numerical approach for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis. In the first model, uncertain parameters are treated as either random variables or interval variables with deterministic distributions, which exist independently. In the second model, uncertain parameters are quantified as random interval variables, where the bounds of interval variables are expressed as random variables instead of deterministic values. In both models, the effect of input hybrid uncertainties on output response is interpreted by an interval number with random bounds. To predict the moments of random bounds of interval response, a double-loop numerical analysis framework is constructed, where the outer loop is executed to traverse the discrete points for random variables and the inner loop is implemented to capture the response extreme values for interval variables. To further solve the computationally expensive issue caused by the full-scale finite element simulations, a cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is introduced as an approximation, which can achieve an acceptable accuracy through a small number of sample points. Finally, a transient heat conduction example demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed models and method.</description><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conduction heating</subject><subject>Conductive heat transfer</subject><subject>Cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model</subject><subject>Double-loop numerical analysis framework</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Hybrid interval-random model</subject><subject>Interval response with random bounds</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>Transient heat conduction</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Uncertainty propagation analysis</subject><issn>0888-3270</issn><issn>1096-1216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AjcB1x3zaNN04WIYfMGAG11KSJNUU9qmJulI_70Z69rVhXvPOdzzAXCN0QYjzG7bzdyHMG4IwlXasILiE7DCqGIZJpidghXinGeUlOgcXITQIoSqHLEVeN9C5fpRehntwcAQJz1D18D47aAdovEH2WVeDtr1sHfadAE2zsPPufZWw2lQxkeZhDMcvRvlR4pxA5SD7OZgwyU4a2QXzNXfXIO3h_vX3VO2f3l83m33maIUx6wipORIlYSpusbcUKJ4I5HJ60ajUpcFaSgvEE_XSrFclZwqqbhWeSHzglC6BjdLbnriazIhitZNPj0RBKEFZZjjqkwquqiUdyF404jR2176WWAkjhxFK345iiNHsXBMrrvFlbqbgzVeBGVNKq6tNyoK7ey__h8yCn6X</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Wang, Chong</creator><creator>Matthies, Hermann G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis</title><author>Wang, Chong ; Matthies, Hermann G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conduction heating</topic><topic>Conductive heat transfer</topic><topic>Cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model</topic><topic>Double-loop numerical analysis framework</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Hybrid interval-random model</topic><topic>Interval response with random bounds</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>Transient heat conduction</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Uncertainty propagation analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthies, Hermann G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Mechanical systems and signal processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Chong</au><au>Matthies, Hermann G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis</atitle><jtitle>Mechanical systems and signal processing</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>136</volume><spage>106531</spage><pages>106531-</pages><artnum>106531</artnum><issn>0888-3270</issn><eissn>1096-1216</eissn><abstract>•Parallel-type and embedded-type interval-random models are presented to quantify hybrid uncertainties.•A universal numerical approach is proposed for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis.•The output response in hybrid circumstance is interpreted as an interval number with random bounds.•A cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is constructed to improve the computational cost.
A wide variety of uncertainty propagation methods have been developed to deal with the single uncertainty; however, different kinds of uncertainties may exist simultaneously in many engineering practices. By using random variables and interval variables to quantify the probabilistic and non-probabilistic uncertainties respectively, this paper proposes two different interval-random models and a universal numerical approach for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis. In the first model, uncertain parameters are treated as either random variables or interval variables with deterministic distributions, which exist independently. In the second model, uncertain parameters are quantified as random interval variables, where the bounds of interval variables are expressed as random variables instead of deterministic values. In both models, the effect of input hybrid uncertainties on output response is interpreted by an interval number with random bounds. To predict the moments of random bounds of interval response, a double-loop numerical analysis framework is constructed, where the outer loop is executed to traverse the discrete points for random variables and the inner loop is implemented to capture the response extreme values for interval variables. To further solve the computationally expensive issue caused by the full-scale finite element simulations, a cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is introduced as an approximation, which can achieve an acceptable accuracy through a small number of sample points. Finally, a transient heat conduction example demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed models and method.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106531</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-3270 |
ispartof | Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2020-02, Vol.136, p.106531, Article 106531 |
issn | 0888-3270 1096-1216 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2353618197 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Comparative studies Computer simulation Conduction heating Conductive heat transfer Cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model Double-loop numerical analysis framework Extreme values Hybrid interval-random model Interval response with random bounds Mathematical models Numerical analysis Parameter uncertainty Propagation Random variables Transient heat conduction Uncertainty analysis Uncertainty propagation analysis |
title | A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A02%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20of%20two%20interval-random%20models%20for%20hybrid%20uncertainty%20propagation%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Mechanical%20systems%20and%20signal%20processing&rft.au=Wang,%20Chong&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=136&rft.spage=106531&rft.pages=106531-&rft.artnum=106531&rft.issn=0888-3270&rft.eissn=1096-1216&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106531&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353618197%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353618197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |