Loading…

A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis

•Parallel-type and embedded-type interval-random models are presented to quantify hybrid uncertainties.•A universal numerical approach is proposed for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis.•The output response in hybrid circumstance is interpreted as an interval number with random bounds.•A cross...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mechanical systems and signal processing 2020-02, Vol.136, p.106531, Article 106531
Main Authors: Wang, Chong, Matthies, Hermann G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106531
container_title Mechanical systems and signal processing
container_volume 136
creator Wang, Chong
Matthies, Hermann G.
description •Parallel-type and embedded-type interval-random models are presented to quantify hybrid uncertainties.•A universal numerical approach is proposed for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis.•The output response in hybrid circumstance is interpreted as an interval number with random bounds.•A cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is constructed to improve the computational cost. A wide variety of uncertainty propagation methods have been developed to deal with the single uncertainty; however, different kinds of uncertainties may exist simultaneously in many engineering practices. By using random variables and interval variables to quantify the probabilistic and non-probabilistic uncertainties respectively, this paper proposes two different interval-random models and a universal numerical approach for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis. In the first model, uncertain parameters are treated as either random variables or interval variables with deterministic distributions, which exist independently. In the second model, uncertain parameters are quantified as random interval variables, where the bounds of interval variables are expressed as random variables instead of deterministic values. In both models, the effect of input hybrid uncertainties on output response is interpreted by an interval number with random bounds. To predict the moments of random bounds of interval response, a double-loop numerical analysis framework is constructed, where the outer loop is executed to traverse the discrete points for random variables and the inner loop is implemented to capture the response extreme values for interval variables. To further solve the computationally expensive issue caused by the full-scale finite element simulations, a cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is introduced as an approximation, which can achieve an acceptable accuracy through a small number of sample points. Finally, a transient heat conduction example demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed models and method.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106531
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2353618197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0888327019307526</els_id><sourcerecordid>2353618197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AjcB1x3zaNN04WIYfMGAG11KSJNUU9qmJulI_70Z69rVhXvPOdzzAXCN0QYjzG7bzdyHMG4IwlXasILiE7DCqGIZJpidghXinGeUlOgcXITQIoSqHLEVeN9C5fpRehntwcAQJz1D18D47aAdovEH2WVeDtr1sHfadAE2zsPPufZWw2lQxkeZhDMcvRvlR4pxA5SD7OZgwyU4a2QXzNXfXIO3h_vX3VO2f3l83m33maIUx6wipORIlYSpusbcUKJ4I5HJ60ajUpcFaSgvEE_XSrFclZwqqbhWeSHzglC6BjdLbnriazIhitZNPj0RBKEFZZjjqkwquqiUdyF404jR2176WWAkjhxFK345iiNHsXBMrrvFlbqbgzVeBGVNKq6tNyoK7ey__h8yCn6X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353618197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Wang, Chong ; Matthies, Hermann G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chong ; Matthies, Hermann G.</creatorcontrib><description>•Parallel-type and embedded-type interval-random models are presented to quantify hybrid uncertainties.•A universal numerical approach is proposed for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis.•The output response in hybrid circumstance is interpreted as an interval number with random bounds.•A cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is constructed to improve the computational cost. A wide variety of uncertainty propagation methods have been developed to deal with the single uncertainty; however, different kinds of uncertainties may exist simultaneously in many engineering practices. By using random variables and interval variables to quantify the probabilistic and non-probabilistic uncertainties respectively, this paper proposes two different interval-random models and a universal numerical approach for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis. In the first model, uncertain parameters are treated as either random variables or interval variables with deterministic distributions, which exist independently. In the second model, uncertain parameters are quantified as random interval variables, where the bounds of interval variables are expressed as random variables instead of deterministic values. In both models, the effect of input hybrid uncertainties on output response is interpreted by an interval number with random bounds. To predict the moments of random bounds of interval response, a double-loop numerical analysis framework is constructed, where the outer loop is executed to traverse the discrete points for random variables and the inner loop is implemented to capture the response extreme values for interval variables. To further solve the computationally expensive issue caused by the full-scale finite element simulations, a cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is introduced as an approximation, which can achieve an acceptable accuracy through a small number of sample points. Finally, a transient heat conduction example demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed models and method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-3270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-1216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106531</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Comparative studies ; Computer simulation ; Conduction heating ; Conductive heat transfer ; Cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model ; Double-loop numerical analysis framework ; Extreme values ; Hybrid interval-random model ; Interval response with random bounds ; Mathematical models ; Numerical analysis ; Parameter uncertainty ; Propagation ; Random variables ; Transient heat conduction ; Uncertainty analysis ; Uncertainty propagation analysis</subject><ispartof>Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2020-02, Vol.136, p.106531, Article 106531</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthies, Hermann G.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis</title><title>Mechanical systems and signal processing</title><description>•Parallel-type and embedded-type interval-random models are presented to quantify hybrid uncertainties.•A universal numerical approach is proposed for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis.•The output response in hybrid circumstance is interpreted as an interval number with random bounds.•A cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is constructed to improve the computational cost. A wide variety of uncertainty propagation methods have been developed to deal with the single uncertainty; however, different kinds of uncertainties may exist simultaneously in many engineering practices. By using random variables and interval variables to quantify the probabilistic and non-probabilistic uncertainties respectively, this paper proposes two different interval-random models and a universal numerical approach for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis. In the first model, uncertain parameters are treated as either random variables or interval variables with deterministic distributions, which exist independently. In the second model, uncertain parameters are quantified as random interval variables, where the bounds of interval variables are expressed as random variables instead of deterministic values. In both models, the effect of input hybrid uncertainties on output response is interpreted by an interval number with random bounds. To predict the moments of random bounds of interval response, a double-loop numerical analysis framework is constructed, where the outer loop is executed to traverse the discrete points for random variables and the inner loop is implemented to capture the response extreme values for interval variables. To further solve the computationally expensive issue caused by the full-scale finite element simulations, a cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is introduced as an approximation, which can achieve an acceptable accuracy through a small number of sample points. Finally, a transient heat conduction example demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed models and method.</description><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conduction heating</subject><subject>Conductive heat transfer</subject><subject>Cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model</subject><subject>Double-loop numerical analysis framework</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Hybrid interval-random model</subject><subject>Interval response with random bounds</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>Transient heat conduction</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Uncertainty propagation analysis</subject><issn>0888-3270</issn><issn>1096-1216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AjcB1x3zaNN04WIYfMGAG11KSJNUU9qmJulI_70Z69rVhXvPOdzzAXCN0QYjzG7bzdyHMG4IwlXasILiE7DCqGIZJpidghXinGeUlOgcXITQIoSqHLEVeN9C5fpRehntwcAQJz1D18D47aAdovEH2WVeDtr1sHfadAE2zsPPufZWw2lQxkeZhDMcvRvlR4pxA5SD7OZgwyU4a2QXzNXfXIO3h_vX3VO2f3l83m33maIUx6wipORIlYSpusbcUKJ4I5HJ60ajUpcFaSgvEE_XSrFclZwqqbhWeSHzglC6BjdLbnriazIhitZNPj0RBKEFZZjjqkwquqiUdyF404jR2176WWAkjhxFK345iiNHsXBMrrvFlbqbgzVeBGVNKq6tNyoK7ey__h8yCn6X</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Wang, Chong</creator><creator>Matthies, Hermann G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis</title><author>Wang, Chong ; Matthies, Hermann G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conduction heating</topic><topic>Conductive heat transfer</topic><topic>Cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model</topic><topic>Double-loop numerical analysis framework</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Hybrid interval-random model</topic><topic>Interval response with random bounds</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>Transient heat conduction</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Uncertainty propagation analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthies, Hermann G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Mechanical systems and signal processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Chong</au><au>Matthies, Hermann G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis</atitle><jtitle>Mechanical systems and signal processing</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>136</volume><spage>106531</spage><pages>106531-</pages><artnum>106531</artnum><issn>0888-3270</issn><eissn>1096-1216</eissn><abstract>•Parallel-type and embedded-type interval-random models are presented to quantify hybrid uncertainties.•A universal numerical approach is proposed for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis.•The output response in hybrid circumstance is interpreted as an interval number with random bounds.•A cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is constructed to improve the computational cost. A wide variety of uncertainty propagation methods have been developed to deal with the single uncertainty; however, different kinds of uncertainties may exist simultaneously in many engineering practices. By using random variables and interval variables to quantify the probabilistic and non-probabilistic uncertainties respectively, this paper proposes two different interval-random models and a universal numerical approach for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis. In the first model, uncertain parameters are treated as either random variables or interval variables with deterministic distributions, which exist independently. In the second model, uncertain parameters are quantified as random interval variables, where the bounds of interval variables are expressed as random variables instead of deterministic values. In both models, the effect of input hybrid uncertainties on output response is interpreted by an interval number with random bounds. To predict the moments of random bounds of interval response, a double-loop numerical analysis framework is constructed, where the outer loop is executed to traverse the discrete points for random variables and the inner loop is implemented to capture the response extreme values for interval variables. To further solve the computationally expensive issue caused by the full-scale finite element simulations, a cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model is introduced as an approximation, which can achieve an acceptable accuracy through a small number of sample points. Finally, a transient heat conduction example demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed models and method.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106531</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-3270
ispartof Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2020-02, Vol.136, p.106531, Article 106531
issn 0888-3270
1096-1216
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2353618197
source Elsevier
subjects Comparative studies
Computer simulation
Conduction heating
Conductive heat transfer
Cross validation-based adaptive surrogate model
Double-loop numerical analysis framework
Extreme values
Hybrid interval-random model
Interval response with random bounds
Mathematical models
Numerical analysis
Parameter uncertainty
Propagation
Random variables
Transient heat conduction
Uncertainty analysis
Uncertainty propagation analysis
title A comparative study of two interval-random models for hybrid uncertainty propagation analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A02%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20of%20two%20interval-random%20models%20for%20hybrid%20uncertainty%20propagation%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Mechanical%20systems%20and%20signal%20processing&rft.au=Wang,%20Chong&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=136&rft.spage=106531&rft.pages=106531-&rft.artnum=106531&rft.issn=0888-3270&rft.eissn=1096-1216&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106531&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353618197%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-922780c726cbb18e32c8fa0e4bfd07d752f38508cbb9c64c783cac8dc45a45233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353618197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true