Firms and parental justice: should firms contribute to the cost of parenthood and procreation?

This article asks whether firms should contribute to the costs of procreation and parenthood. We explore two sets of arguments. First, we ask what the principle of fair play – central in parental justice debates – implies. We argue that if one defends a pro-sharing view, firms are required to should...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Economics and philosophy 2020-03, Vol.36 (1), p.1-27
Main Authors: Blanc, Sandrine, Meijers, Tim
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Business costs
Caregivers
Companies
Discrimination
Economic theory
Economics
Employees
Employers
Employment discrimination
Equal opportunities
Equality
Family leave
Incentives
Parents & parenting
Pregnancy
Procreation
Workplaces
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article asks whether firms should contribute to the costs of procreation and parenthood. We explore two sets of arguments. First, we ask what the principle of fair play – central in parental justice debates – implies. We argue that if one defends a pro-sharing view, firms are required to shoulder part of the costs of procreation and parenthood. Second, we turn to the principle of fair equality of opportunity. We argue that compensating firms for costs they incur because their employees decide to procreate or parent may undermine some of the incentives leading to (statistical) discrimination in the workplace.
ISSN:0266-2671
1474-0028
DOI:10.1017/S0266267119000014